MercurySteam said:
deathbydeath said:
i'm not judging by the cover, i'm judging based on past trends, what the devs say, and logic.
Logic? Really? Logic tells you that ME3 is going to be a shit game? Dude, I don't know what kind of logic you run on but clearly your definition of logic isn't the same as that of the rest of us. You may as well say that logic says that the PS3 is the best console of all time, or some shit like that.
deathbydeath said:
they're bringing even more......stupid science to the table.
Oh sure. In the future we're allowed diverse alien races, Mass Effect technology, and Machine Gods but we're not allowed to have an experimental project to bring the main character back from the dead. Fooey!
well, me1 was a great game that blended action combat with dnd, and took a more rpg route than jade empire (which was also good). me2, on the other hand, pretty much rewrote the gameplay. there were practically no rpg bits compared to the last one, and what there was is simply pathetic. stalker has better rpg elements than me2, for god's sake. based on the previous trend, and what the devs have been saying, it looks like me3 will pretty much be me2. now to the logic part: me1 sold fairly well, but it wasn't really a blockbuster (quite the shame). me2, on the other hand, was a massive hit, was universally praised by pretty much every professional game journalist, and won quite a few awards (including best writing lol). seeing as this is a business, which success will bioware/ea try to recreate? bam, logic.
about the stupid science, there's something called "suspension of disbelief". this means that the reader/watcher/player can pass over something implausible if there is a justification for it (that's the definition off the top of my head, so don't judge me).
massive robots with a god complex: while there's no origin/explanation, they're supposed to be shrouded in mystery, so it's understandable that the protagonist/player doesn't know much about them, but bioware could easily explain that in me3. besides, if we're capable of robots and ais now, why not in the future?
diverse alien races: take how we got here, and apply it to them.
gravity
Mass effect technology: take element zero, and apply a electric current to it, and it generates a field that alter's any object's mass. while it could be worded a little better (like using gravity instead of mass), it's pretty much a glorified magnet that changes. implausible, but there's enough sensible science jargon thrown around to make it seem like a magnet, which makes sense to us.
lazarus project: absolutely nothing at all. you're expecting me to believe that a), cerberus could recover shepard's body after he went through re-entry? b), all we see is a body injected with gatorade, and we hear that cerberus could've bought an army with the money used to resurrect shepard. that's it.
give me some more plausable information, and i'll be more than willing to shed my disbelief, but bioware failed on their part of the bargain, so don't expect me to hold up mine.
sorry for the text wall, i'll try to be brief next time.