Matter /CAN/ be created!

Recommended Videos

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Vigilante 989 said:
RJ 17 said:
Alright, many of you have probably seen this before, but for those of you who haven't: get ready for some mathematical magic as I show you an old trick I learned back in highschool to algerbraeicly (spelling) prove that 0.999repeating actually = 1 by itself.

Start with x = 0.999rep

x = 0.999rep

Multiply both sides of the equation by 10

10x = 9.999rep

Subtract x from both sides.

9x = 9 (10x - x = 9x, 9.999rep - x (which was originally stated as = 0.999rep) = 9)

Divide both sides by 9

x = 1

You can also do this with fractions and logic.

1/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.333rep

2/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.666rep

3/3 as a fraction SHOULD equal 0.999rep....but as a fraction, having three thirds of something means you've got the whole thing, which equates to 1.

:p

(on a side not...the Captcha required to post this contained the word "deleted" spelled backwards and upsidedown...what in god's name am I supposed to do there? (cycled through it) )


Alright hotshot, how do you go about creating matter?
All I've done is shown the algebraic proof that 0.999rep = 1, the mystery lies in finding where that extra 0.(insert infinite string of 0's)1 comes from to bump all the 9's up to 10's thus making 0.999rep = 1. If we can figure out where that extra decimal comes from, we will have absolute control over the entire universe.
 

Vigilante 989

New member
Jan 17, 2012
53
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Vigilante 989 said:
RJ 17 said:
Alright, many of you have probably seen this before, but for those of you who haven't: get ready for some mathematical magic as I show you an old trick I learned back in highschool to algerbraeicly (spelling) prove that 0.999repeating actually = 1 by itself.

Start with x = 0.999rep

x = 0.999rep

Multiply both sides of the equation by 10

10x = 9.999rep

Subtract x from both sides.

9x = 9 (10x - x = 9x, 9.999rep - x (which was originally stated as = 0.999rep) = 9)

Divide both sides by 9

x = 1

You can also do this with fractions and logic.

1/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.333rep

2/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.666rep

3/3 as a fraction SHOULD equal 0.999rep....but as a fraction, having three thirds of something means you've got the whole thing, which equates to 1.

:p

(on a side not...the Captcha required to post this contained the word "deleted" spelled backwards and upsidedown...what in god's name am I supposed to do there? (cycled through it) )


Alright hotshot, how do you go about creating matter?
All I've done is shown the algebraic proof that 0.999rep = 1, the mystery lies in finding where that extra 0.(insert infinite string of 0's)1 comes from to bump all the 9's up to 10's thus making 0.999rep = 1. If we can figure out where that extra decimal comes from, we will have absolute control over the entire universe.


With that type of control, I guarantee the human race will find away to royaly fuck it up.
 

AngryMongoose

Elite Member
Jan 18, 2010
1,230
0
41
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
0.0_1 = 0. Where did you get the idea that 0.9_ is infinitely close to 1 without being 1? If you want that number, write "1 - ε"
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Vigilante 989 said:
RJ 17 said:
Vigilante 989 said:
RJ 17 said:
Alright, many of you have probably seen this before, but for those of you who haven't: get ready for some mathematical magic as I show you an old trick I learned back in highschool to algerbraeicly (spelling) prove that 0.999repeating actually = 1 by itself.

Start with x = 0.999rep

x = 0.999rep

Multiply both sides of the equation by 10

10x = 9.999rep

Subtract x from both sides.

9x = 9 (10x - x = 9x, 9.999rep - x (which was originally stated as = 0.999rep) = 9)

Divide both sides by 9

x = 1

You can also do this with fractions and logic.

1/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.333rep

2/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.666rep

3/3 as a fraction SHOULD equal 0.999rep....but as a fraction, having three thirds of something means you've got the whole thing, which equates to 1.

:p

(on a side not...the Captcha required to post this contained the word "deleted" spelled backwards and upsidedown...what in god's name am I supposed to do there? (cycled through it) )


Alright hotshot, how do you go about creating matter?
All I've done is shown the algebraic proof that 0.999rep = 1, the mystery lies in finding where that extra 0.(insert infinite string of 0's)1 comes from to bump all the 9's up to 10's thus making 0.999rep = 1. If we can figure out where that extra decimal comes from, we will have absolute control over the entire universe.


With that type of control, I guarantee the human race will find away to royaly fuck it up.
Most likely. I hope I'm still around to watch us rip the universe a new one. :3
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
CulixCupric said:
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
right, .999_ != 1.0

but .333_ = 1/3 and .666_ = 2/3

1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 = 1/1 = 1.0

also, a flaw in conceptual math does not prove that matter can be created.
exactly, our flawed understanding of infinity does not prove anything. It only proves we don't really get it. the first and second law of thermodynamics got you covered in material creation, math is a tool, created by man, so it's conventions are limited by our understanding.

saying math breaks any theory is like saying glass is indestructable because you only have cloth hammers. Had we better tools we would be able to break glass, but our tools are flawed.
 

NightHawk21

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,273
0
0
CulixCupric said:
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
right, .999_ != 1.0

but .333_ = 1/3 and .666_ = 2/3

1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 = 1/1 = 1.0

also, a flaw in conceptual math does not prove that matter can be created.
I'm fairly certain that 1/3 does not equal .33333 repeating since its not actually a third of 1. The thing is that drag it on for a while and it essentially acts like 1/3. Its the same reason its reasonable to approximate graphs with asymptotes for very large numbers as x=asymptote at very large x.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
AngryMongoose said:
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
0.0_1 = 0. Where did you get the idea that 0.9_ is infinitely close to 1 without being 1? If you want that number, write "1 - ε"
And what would that look like as a decimal? 0.999_
 

CaptainKarma

New member
Dec 16, 2011
172
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Vigilante 989 said:
RJ 17 said:
Alright, many of you have probably seen this before, but for those of you who haven't: get ready for some mathematical magic as I show you an old trick I learned back in highschool to algerbraeicly (spelling) prove that 0.999repeating actually = 1 by itself.

Start with x = 0.999rep

x = 0.999rep

Multiply both sides of the equation by 10

10x = 9.999rep

Subtract x from both sides.

9x = 9 (10x - x = 9x, 9.999rep - x (which was originally stated as = 0.999rep) = 9)

Divide both sides by 9

x = 1

You can also do this with fractions and logic.

1/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.333rep

2/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.666rep

3/3 as a fraction SHOULD equal 0.999rep....but as a fraction, having three thirds of something means you've got the whole thing, which equates to 1.

:p

(on a side not...the Captcha required to post this contained the word "deleted" spelled backwards and upsidedown...what in god's name am I supposed to do there? (cycled through it) )


Alright hotshot, how do you go about creating matter?
All I've done is shown the algebraic proof that 0.999rep = 1, the mystery lies in finding where that extra 0.(insert infinite string of 0's)1 comes from to bump all the 9's up to 10's thus making 0.999rep = 1. If we can figure out where that extra decimal comes from, we will have absolute control over the entire universe.
The 0.....1 doesn't come from anywhere, it's meaningless. You can't have "an infinite line of zeros that end in 1", you cant even have "a nearly infinite line of zeros that ends in 1".

Your confusion comes from rationalising 0.999... as a really really long line that eventually terminates. It doesn't. It goes on forever. I kind of picture it as an infinitely growing line, so that whenever anything gets close to the terminal 9, another 9 appears next to it.
 

bertster

New member
Jan 15, 2012
3
0
0
1 = 0.999...
its just another way of writing the same number. similar to how we write half as 0.5 but also 1/2 and also 2/4 etc without maths collapsing in on itself.

RJ 17 said:
That's not necessarily true, if it was, then 2.999rep would = 3. But the proof given in my OP doesn't work in that case. It only works for 0.999rep = 1
2.9999...=x
29.9999...=10x
27 = 29.999-2.9999 = 10x-x = 9x
3=x

Therefore 3=2.999...

proof is basically identical
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
RJ 17 said:
AngryMongoose said:
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
0.0_1 = 0. Where did you get the idea that 0.9_ is infinitely close to 1 without being 1? If you want that number, write "1 - ε"
And what would that look like as a decimal? 0.999_
thats the problem, you CAN't express that as a decimal. only approach it. you'll get a wiggly '=' meaning 'roughly'
 

WWmelb

New member
Sep 7, 2011
702
0
0
Berenzen said:
Any mathematician will tell you that .999... is equal to 1. This is because 0.000...1 does not exist. A mathematician could explain it better than I can.

The closest way that we can create matter is by converting energy into it. However, Mass and Energy must be conserved unless you want to get into insane multidimensional physics that is no more than conjecture.

The equation to Mass-Energy equivalence is E^2=m^2c^4 + p^2c^2.

Light has mass-energy equivalence depending on the energy of the photon. Measured in MeV (Mega electronVolts), energy is affected by gravity because of warping in space-time, as defined through general relativity.

A black hole has a definite mass, and in fact it can be calculated by the size of it's schwartzchild radius- radius of the event horizon. Equation is r=2GM/c^2. All matter has a schwartzchild radius, but most of them are contained within the actual particles itself.

F=GMM/r^2 cannot equal infinite. Even as you approach the center of a black hole it does not equal infinite. However, it approaches it asymptotically. In order for an object to have infinite gravitational attraction to another object, it must exist at the exact same location of the other object, a physical impossibility.

People, before you start spewing out physics, you should probably take a physics/astronomy course beforehand, instead of just looking at equations and thinking you know it.
Okay ... i need to find a physicist girlfriend... because a chick reeling that off in the bedroom would blow my freakin mind... lmao
 

TilMorrow

Diabolical Party Member
Jul 7, 2010
3,246
0
0
Sorry to burst your bubble mate but this thread has existed before with a similar title and it was annoying the first time it came round. Also why did you have to remind me of that equation, it was bad enough getting my head around it the first time. Though it's not a s bad as trig as it's never ending applications/equations. However now that I think about it that could have just been the first time I'd seen that thread and that it could have appeared before.

Wait a minute....

Rabid Toilet said:
Oh god, this thread again.

I guess the image is missing "in a thread like this".
 

AngryMongoose

Elite Member
Jan 18, 2010
1,230
0
41
RJ 17 said:
AngryMongoose said:
RJ 17 said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
That doesn't mean matter can be created though. It just means that .999 repeating is the same as 1.
But how can 0.999_ = 1 when 0.999_ is meant to represent a number infinitely close to 1 without actually being 1? Where does the extra 0.(insert infinite line of zeros)1 come from that bumps all the 9s ahead of it to 10s, thus making it 1?
0.0_1 = 0. Where did you get the idea that 0.9_ is infinitely close to 1 without being 1? If you want that number, write "1 - ε"
And what would that look like as a decimal? 0.999_
Hepaderp? It has no decimal representation. For any decimal you create, you can find one closer (that's the hole point); but 0.9 recurring (which shall hence forth be referred to by it's proper name: 1) is not less than one.
 

geizr

New member
Oct 9, 2008
850
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Alright, many of you have probably seen this before, but for those of you who haven't: get ready for some mathematical magic as I show you an old trick I learned back in highschool to algerbraeicly (spelling) prove that 0.999repeating actually = 1 by itself.

Start with x = 0.999rep

x = 0.999rep

Multiply both sides of the equation by 10

10x = 9.999rep

Subtract x from both sides.

9x = 9 (10x - x = 9x, 9.999rep - x (which was originally stated as = 0.999rep) = 9)

Divide both sides by 9

x = 1

You can also do this with fractions and logic.

1/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.333rep

2/3 as a fraction is equal to 0.666rep

3/3 as a fraction SHOULD equal 0.999rep....but as a fraction, having three thirds of something means you've got the whole thing, which equates to 1.

:p

(on a side not...the Captcha required to post this contained the word "deleted" spelled backwards and upsidedown...what in god's name am I supposed to do there? (cycled through it) )
I've seen this trick a couple times, and it is incorrect because it breaks cardinality. The key thing to realize is that infinity is not the same size in all cases. When you multiply x=0.9999rep by 10, you have increased the cardinality by 1 with a hidden zero all the way at the end. Thus, 10*x and x don't have the same cardinality. As a result, 10*x - x =/= 9.0000rep; there is a hidden 1 all the way at the last digit. Another way of seeing it is that 10*x =/= 9 + x because of the differences in cardinality. Consequently, 10*x - x = 9*x =/= 9.

To convince yourself of the cardinality problem, start with a finite number of digits and then extend the process by adding more digits. Keep going till you get to an infinite number of digits. You'll see that no matter how many digits you have, you always end up with an extra 0 after multiply by 10 and a remaining 1 after doing the subtraction in the last digit.

EDIT: I should have pointed out that cardinality is the size of a set, and it can be used to deal with infinite sets like 0.999rep.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
CaptainKarma said:
What do you mean by "an infinite"? People multiply infinitely long numbers together all the time. Theres this thing called, Pi, you may have heard of it.
Given I did a degree in Maths, yes I did. What you may not know is that such numbers are called equivalencies and are used as approximations. 0.9Rep x 10 = 10 because that is the only way to get .9Rep. (It's an infinite approximation in itself ; An asymptote to give it it's contextual definition)

What you may also remember from basic Trigonometry is that the radius and other calculations made from pi are rounded to the nearest two decimal places, because they are known to be inaccurate.

You may want to look up Calculus, Numerical Methods, Simultaneous Differential Equations and the works of Simon Singh.

Also Messers. Strunk and White.
 

DasDestroyer

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,330
0
0
It's not a "neat" mathematical magic trick - it's just someone fascinated about something they have no understanding of(infinity) trying to get attention and a large post count on their topic(as pointed out by Cracked).

Depending on how you look at it, it can be either that 0.999 repeating * 10 = 9.99 repeating 1 less time, ie. 0.999 becomes 9.99, 0.9999999 becomes 9.999999 etc. so when you subtract x you get 9.99-0.999=8.991
8.991/9 = 0.999
and similarly for any amount of 9's.

Or if you take repeating as a truly infinite amount of 9's, then 0.999 repeating, quite simply is 1, due to the nature of infinity.
 

thylasos

New member
Aug 12, 2009
1,920
0
0
So... a misleading title to lead people into a thread where anyone who can understandthe topic already knows it, not to mention people (me) who've heard it, and simply accept it because they don't care enough about maths to consider it.

So... no discussion value, apart from pointing out that people who only use functional mathematics don't know complex mathematics, and that people will instinctively assume that numbers that aren't 1 aren't 1.
 

Daverson

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,164
0
0
0.9r doesn't equal 1 (obviously if one number was equal to another entirely different number all maths would cease to function correctly). The entire existence of recurring decimals when dividing by 3 is an anomaly in the base 10 number system, in base 9, 1/3=0.3 exactly. (Of course you get similar behaviour dividing by 2 in base 9)

Though I fail to see how this proves mass can just be generated. Mass can just be generated (and destroyed with much greater ease), but doing it is a bit more complex than simply cutting your sandwich into three equally sized pieces.