NOTE: I found this in another thread and instead of derailing the thread I decided to make a new one devoted to this topic.
It's very good to see them put so much work into this and to be so conscious about it too, and for those planning on having a homosexual turn in ME3 I'm sure this is very interesting...
...But why? Even for a gay Shepard playthrough it's...out of place. And what's with the "accidentally discovers" bit? Why does a straight gamer's playthrough have to grind to a halt to turn into a "defend gay preferences" story for a whole chapter? Why does a gay gamer's for that matter?
Look, in Persona 4 Kanji's homosexuality had to do with the story. The Kanji arc is part of the plot because the plot involved what society thinks of people, and how people think of themselves. It was literally about the inner lies we tell ourselves and the rejection of our true selves. It was actually very intimately woven into the main story.
What does this have to do with the Reapers? What's this have to do with...anything?
As a great friend (one who knows more about homosexuality in story telling than I do) told me in response:
"I think it's a dumb idea.
Why make a whole section that the character has to play though? Making your character homosexual should be a choice in the game that you can seek out- like a side quest or just make it that you can woo any of the partner choices male or female.
You shouldn't have to be forced into a section to 'test your reactions to make your character gay/what they think of another character being gay'
That's dumb.
Just make the game. And then make it so that no matter what gender you are, you can chase after anyone.
Its not 'revolutionary' or 'insipring' to make it a requirement to answer if you're gay or not or what you think of another character being gay. It's insulting and degrading. And it will most likely cause a lot of people to have longwinded homophobic discussions."
Basically, making an entire section devoted to homosexuality is pointless and kind of insulting. If you want to make homosexuality natural in your story, don't put it under a spotlight and force everyone to stare at it. Set it amongst everything else in the story. Homophobia has never been an issue in ME before...so why now that the universe is under attack would anyone suddenly grimace at two dudes or two women?
It's blatant pandering, which is what set everyone off about the Garrus and Tali romances to begin with. However at least those were side quests. Optional. They affected the story, yes, but the story didn't stop for the romance to ensue. It was part of it.
_More importantly, this is just another ploy from Bioware to make people talk about the game in a pseudo "revolutionary" light and say "Bioware is changing things in the gaming industry". Sorry everyone, but it's not right.
Shepard being gay or having a gay couple in the cast should be natural. Devoting an entire chapter to it is as awkward and ridiculous as those classic anime titles with insultingly flamboyant gay characters.
Pulling the game over to stop the plot and take a break at the "what do you think of homosexuality" rest stop is just as stupid.
EDIT:
Not to sound like a downer...but isn't this exactly what theultimateend was talking about? I mean, you know, not to derail the thread, just want to respond to this.barash said:Found this in the deep currents of teh interwebz - gave me the lolsies ^_^theultimateend said:Whatever it is it'll be super gay.barash said:Whatever they make, will be 'streamlined to be even more accessible to the fans and when you press a button something awesome will happen! Twice!'.
Screw Bioware, they're cutting to many corners in the name of a quicker buck. And the corners they cut are all from the RPG-part of the equation.
I mean that literally. They are forcing the topic so hard. Good lord, I'm as pro sexuality of any natural nature as you can get without becoming a point singularity for it, but even I'm thinking "Alright guys...that's a little bit forced."
I imagine their next game will be like heavy rain but the plot twist will be that everyone is gay.
I wouldn't mind it if it was canon, but the hardcore retconning is just really jarring.
Again, in no way anti-gay, just think Bioware is going about it very tacky and ruining an oppurtunity.
--
Meanwhile, at Bioware..
![]()
:trollface
--
It's very good to see them put so much work into this and to be so conscious about it too, and for those planning on having a homosexual turn in ME3 I'm sure this is very interesting...
...But why? Even for a gay Shepard playthrough it's...out of place. And what's with the "accidentally discovers" bit? Why does a straight gamer's playthrough have to grind to a halt to turn into a "defend gay preferences" story for a whole chapter? Why does a gay gamer's for that matter?
Look, in Persona 4 Kanji's homosexuality had to do with the story. The Kanji arc is part of the plot because the plot involved what society thinks of people, and how people think of themselves. It was literally about the inner lies we tell ourselves and the rejection of our true selves. It was actually very intimately woven into the main story.
What does this have to do with the Reapers? What's this have to do with...anything?
As a great friend (one who knows more about homosexuality in story telling than I do) told me in response:
"I think it's a dumb idea.
Why make a whole section that the character has to play though? Making your character homosexual should be a choice in the game that you can seek out- like a side quest or just make it that you can woo any of the partner choices male or female.
You shouldn't have to be forced into a section to 'test your reactions to make your character gay/what they think of another character being gay'
That's dumb.
Just make the game. And then make it so that no matter what gender you are, you can chase after anyone.
Its not 'revolutionary' or 'insipring' to make it a requirement to answer if you're gay or not or what you think of another character being gay. It's insulting and degrading. And it will most likely cause a lot of people to have longwinded homophobic discussions."
Basically, making an entire section devoted to homosexuality is pointless and kind of insulting. If you want to make homosexuality natural in your story, don't put it under a spotlight and force everyone to stare at it. Set it amongst everything else in the story. Homophobia has never been an issue in ME before...so why now that the universe is under attack would anyone suddenly grimace at two dudes or two women?
It's blatant pandering, which is what set everyone off about the Garrus and Tali romances to begin with. However at least those were side quests. Optional. They affected the story, yes, but the story didn't stop for the romance to ensue. It was part of it.
_More importantly, this is just another ploy from Bioware to make people talk about the game in a pseudo "revolutionary" light and say "Bioware is changing things in the gaming industry". Sorry everyone, but it's not right.
Shepard being gay or having a gay couple in the cast should be natural. Devoting an entire chapter to it is as awkward and ridiculous as those classic anime titles with insultingly flamboyant gay characters.
Pulling the game over to stop the plot and take a break at the "what do you think of homosexuality" rest stop is just as stupid.
EDIT:
Ian Caronia said:Wait, so this is meant to be ironic? ...Where's the joke? Where's the fact showing that it's a joke?ZeroMachine said:THANK YOU! Finally, someone else fucking gets it.LiquidGrape said:Oh for the love of...doesn't anyone recognise [HEADING=2]IRONY[/HEADING] when they see it?
Hepler is obviously poking fun at the tidalwave of homophobia the announcement that ME3 will contain optional s/s romances produced.
I mean, honestly. Read betweent the lines?
Thank you, good sir, thank you for joining me on the logic train. I swear, this Bioware hate is getting way to out of hand when people take a post like that seriously.
Doesn't anyone recognize [HEADING=2]TEXT ON THE INTERNET DOESN'T CARRY YOUR VOICE AND MANNERISMS[/HEADING] when they decide to trype "ironically"? Or, in this case, sarcastically?
Besides, with everything Bioware has been retconning and changing, does this really seem out-of-place for them? Considering half the people who read it take it seriously, or rather the majority, I don't think so.