"We own our platform, Steam. Microsoft owns their platform. They wanted to make sure there's an economy of value there," said Faliszek.Machines Are Us said:You know, that argument is starting to sound really stupid.HentMas said:how weird, a company that wants to make money!?!? ODD!!
If it is free on PC then it should be free on all platforms. The same goes for everything else, it punishes people for buying games on a certain platform and that is not fair.
If they charged on all platforms then your argument would be valid.
Well, the first half was well said, may have gotten slightly over the top towards the end, but most of it was spot on, if a little aggressive.James Cassidy said:Snip.
Dude, it's $7. Who's poor enough not to be able to buy something for $7 let alone the $300 console you have to have in the first place to play the DLC.Disaster Button said:So you basically just said FUCK THE POOR!?ssgt splatter said:Big deal, we have to pay $7 for new DLC. I'm a rich SOB, I have $250 in my wallet alone so it doesn't bother me too much. Besides, Microsoft knows we're going to buy the DLC anyway regardless of the price they put on it so relax; save the price moaning for MW2's price tag.
Thank god I'm a PC gamer <3
Always? When have I ALWAYS been a dick? How am I being a dick now? It's $7. Why are people making such a fuss that the DLC is $7? I know Valve has always had a thing for releasing DLC for free but this much uproar for $7? C'mon!lee1287 said:are you always a dick?ssgt splatter said:Big deal, we have to pay $7 for new DLC. I'm a rich SOB, I have $250 in my wallet alone so it doesn't bother me too much. Besides, Microsoft knows we're going to buy the DLC anyway regardless of the price they put on it so relax; save the price moaning for MW2's price tag.
$7 adds up and paying $7 shows the producer that you are willing to pay $7 in future. Microsoft has departments where they work out how much they make off dlc compared to how many customers they get and your attitude is the green light for them to try for $8 next time.ssgt splatter said:Always? When have I ALWAYS been a dick? How am I being a dick now? It's $7. Why are people making such a fuss that the DLC is $7? I know Valve has always had a thing for releasing DLC for free but this much uproar for $7? C'mon!lee1287 said:are you always a dick?ssgt splatter said:Big deal, we have to pay $7 for new DLC. I'm a rich SOB, I have $250 in my wallet alone so it doesn't bother me too much. Besides, Microsoft knows we're going to buy the DLC anyway regardless of the price they put on it so relax; save the price moaning for MW2's price tag.
Honestly? I just wanted to work in that History of the Worlds quotessgt splatter said:Dude, it's $7. Who's poor enough not to be able to buy something for $7 let alone the $300 console you have to have in the first place to play the DLC.Disaster Button said:So you basically just said FUCK THE POOR!?ssgt splatter said:Big deal, we have to pay $7 for new DLC. I'm a rich SOB, I have $250 in my wallet alone so it doesn't bother me too much. Besides, Microsoft knows we're going to buy the DLC anyway regardless of the price they put on it so relax; save the price moaning for MW2's price tag.
Thank god I'm a PC gamer <3
This pretty much. I mean, what the fuck is up with these guys? First the Halo 3 ODST DLC and now this? Maybe they started taking classes with Capcom about stupidity in these matters. And I do not even own a 360 or intent to buy L4D but this still bugs me like hell.oppp7 said:The sad thing is that people will still dl it...
Copy that.lee1287 said:are you always a dick?ssgt splatter said:Big deal, we have to pay $7 for new DLC. I'm a rich SOB, I have $250 in my wallet alone so it doesn't bother me too much. Besides, Microsoft knows we're going to buy the DLC anyway regardless of the price they put on it so relax; save the price moaning for MW2's price tag.