Microsoft Defends Games on Demand Pricing

Recommended Videos

Kaytastrophe

New member
Jun 7, 2010
277
0
0
"We're incredibly excited about what Games on Demand means for digital distribution, and will continue to evaluate and evolve the service to meet market and consumer demands."

I don't know about that... sounds to me like people want games on demand to be cheaper. As for me? I say let the invisible hand take care of this one. Microsoft can charge whatever they want, I don't have to buy it. That my friends is the beauty of capitalism.
 

WilliamRLBaker

New member
Jan 8, 2010
537
0
0
Eh If you want the game for a cheaper price is easy to get it else where, as for that wait for sales I got a few games on demand games last year at sale price.
And Steam? dont act like steam gives sales out of the goodness of their hearts they give sales to get people into the store and buy more expensive items they use a different marketing method then Microsoft, and it works.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
1. Go to amazon
2. buy halo reach for half the cost of Games on demand
3. Be happy that you didn't waste $40 which can now be spent on another game
4. ????
5. PROFIT!
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Microsoft is a big company so you'd think someone with s business degree would of heard about this and told someone how much of a terrible idea that is. Oh well I guess they're just going to have to see that nobody is biting into their stupid plan before they change. Then again maybe they'll just sit on that price and enjoy there 1 sale a month income stream.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
henritje said:
bullshit! Steam offers the same service for at least half the price
and on multiple systems as well; Windows, Mac and soon Playstation 3.

Steam on PS3 is going to be VERY interesting as it may very well compete with Xbox 360's games service (though not real competition, only real competition with those who own both systems or have bought neither and are trying to decide which to get).

I wonder how much autonomy Sony will offer on PS3 for Steam. Sony already host many third parties though they are mainly media retailers (movies, music, shows, etc) will they tolerate competition in their own ecosystem and if they go at what cut?

Ultimately Microsoft will try to deny there is any competition, that is bullshit they don't like, Microsoft are not true Capitalists they are Fuedalists akin more to running medieval fiefdoms; they want monopoly and control rather than winning the quality/value war.

MS will continue to lock people deeper and deeper into their network, I predict a "platinum membership" even more expensive than gold membership with perks like with playstation-plus.
 

whtkid6969

New member
Jul 11, 2010
114
0
0
wow, i think the people could wait till morning instead of spending that much at midnight for something so stupid
 

babinro

New member
Sep 24, 2010
2,518
0
0
Noelveiga said:
Microsoft either misunderstands the digital distribution market or just has a vested interest in not pushing it over the brick and mortar market, which sounds weird, but is actually plausible.

I mean, for them pushing digital turns them into a PC-like market that has no holiday season and is driven by very low priced sales, like Steam. By keeping downloads at the same cost as new disc based copies or above they ensure that disc is the main point of delivery for games while retaining a secondary window that gives them some money and perhaps helps move the back catalog a bit.

It's either that or they're not paying attention. Which is also possible. Sometimes these decisions are driven by a single guy in an office that doesn't really know what he's talking about all that well because his focus is elsewhere.
I agree completely. Microsoft didn't declare they were trying to compete with companies like Steam...they are simply giving people a convenient option to purchase at or above the cost of a store.

I look at it like a vending machine..I can buy a $2.00 pop, or I could buy a dozen pops for $4.00 if I went to the store. There will be a market for both without alienating one another.
 

Maquette

Robot Oeuf
Sep 10, 2009
94
0
0
I wish they'd put Tales of Vesperia in the Games on Demand section. Even £50 is cheaper than the £80 - 100 it would cost to buy a physical copy online. ;A;
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,563
0
0
Treblaine said:
henritje said:
bullshit! Steam offers the same service for at least half the price
and on multiple systems as well; Windows, Mac and soon Playstation 3.

Steam on PS3 is going to be VERY interesting as it may very well compete with Xbox 360's games service (though not real competition, only real competition with those who own both systems or have bought neither and are trying to decide which to get).

I wonder how much autonomy Sony will offer on PS3 for Steam. Sony already host many third parties though they are mainly media retailers (movies, music, shows, etc) will they tolerate competition in their own ecosystem and if they go at what cut?

Ultimately Microsoft will try to deny there is any competition, that is bullshit they don't like, Microsoft are not true Capitalists they are Fuedalists akin more to running medieval fiefdoms; they want monopoly and control rather than winning the quality/value war.

MS will continue to lock people deeper and deeper into their network, I predict a "platinum membership" even more expensive than gold membership with perks like with playstation-plus.
does that mean that if you bought a game on the PC it would be automatically unlocked on the PS3? (like HL2,L4D etc.)?
 

Nurb

Cynical bastard
Dec 9, 2008
3,078
0
0
When it takes work to offer a service = Service surcharge

When it takes absolutely no effort on their part to deliver the service = Convenience fee

FUCK. YOU. MICROSOFT.

This is why it's so easy for pirates in general to justify themselves, and why paying customers decide not to pay when being treated like this more and more. Being a paying customer means being treated like a theif, then grabbed and shaken upside down for every nickle and dime. This is why I shed no tears for large companies who are targets of piracy.
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,145
0
41
Isn't that right, Gabe?

Gabe?

What are you doing making cheeseburgers out of money? This is serious!
 

Lenriak

New member
Apr 15, 2009
56
0
0
Micro$oft - "If your stupid enough to buy digitally from us, your stupid enough to pay THESE prices :)"
 
Feb 9, 2011
1,735
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
I think I'll just keep holding out for Steam sales, thanks.
Took the words right out of my mouth. After a while, paying for a "convenience factor" becomes an inconvenience in of itself via your wallet. Gas prices still aren't high enough to merit dropping that much change on a single title to avoid getting dressed and going tot he store to buy a physical copy. Now where did I leave my shoes...?
 

Kouryuu

New member
Mar 1, 2011
53
0
0
And they wonder why people pirate games?
May be because a lot of them feel ripped of by the companies?
any other thoughts?
 

cornmancer

New member
Dec 7, 2009
302
0
0
Steam gives better service at a lower price. ESPECIALLY on the PC.
Seriously, fuck Games For Windows Live. Fuck it with a knife.
 

The Artificially Prolonged

Random Semi-Frequent Poster
Jul 15, 2008
2,755
0
0
Charging for convenience, what the hell microsoft. I dunno about you but I find not paying double retail price for games more continent. This is why I get all my games from steam and amazon now.