Don't encourage them, please. Or before you know it Super Mario Bros 3 will be on the list.Hawki said:Since people are including the 2000s as modern games, I guess I can nominate the following:
-Diablo II
-Morrowind
-Majora's Mask
Don't encourage them, please. Or before you know it Super Mario Bros 3 will be on the list.Hawki said:Since people are including the 2000s as modern games, I guess I can nominate the following:
-Diablo II
-Morrowind
-Majora's Mask
It's almost been a year and a half since it was "riding a wave of trend" and the developers offered a huge patch support since the release. Plus it's DLC and Expansion are considered among the best with B&W surpassing any new game this year( where we've seen a lot of strong titles of respected IP's, as in 2015) when it comes to critical reception.Danbo Jambo said:I actually think The Witcher 3 is riding a wave of trend now, and that it's far less interesting, and a far duller experience than a lot of people will realize until a few years down the line.
I very much think that TW3 will go the Skryrim route of people seeing how repetitive and lacklustre it is on return in a few years, as opposed to it becoming a future classic.
A year and a half is nothing though mate. Folk were still drooling over vanilla Skyrim for far longer than that, console owners especially.Athennesi said:It's almost been a year and a half since it was "riding a wave of trend" and the developers offered a huge patch support since the release. Plus it's DLC and Expansion are considered among the best with B&W surpassing any new game this year( where we've seen a lot of strong titles of respected IP's, as in 2015) when it comes to critical reception.Danbo Jambo said:I actually think The Witcher 3 is riding a wave of trend now, and that it's far less interesting, and a far duller experience than a lot of people will realize until a few years down the line.
I very much think that TW3 will go the Skryrim route of people seeing how repetitive and lacklustre it is on return in a few years, as opposed to it becoming a future classic.
And you can see journalists are still writing articles on it and developers of coming titles are already stating they've been influenced by WH( Horizon, FF XV, AC...).
You're welcome to your opinion, but facts really don't support what you're saying. It's very different then how it was with something like 2014's GOTY Inquisition, while Skyrim owes a whole damn lot to it's modding community.
I'll admit that if I had one huge criticism of the Soul's games, it would be the character side quests. Many of them are so convoluted that I don't know how you would know to do them all. It was especially bad in Demon Soul's, where side quests depended on world tendencies, which were never fully explained. I'm pretty sure it was actually impossible to get all of them done in one playthrough. The issue wasn't subtlety, it was wonky quest design.Ezekiel said:I don't like how cryptic the series is. Reading through the wiki articles to follow quests is a convoluted chore. You'll never find all the secrets yourself and you're only making them harder by not referring to the wikis, since you're forced into another NG+ with stronger enemies every time you finish. I still remember being upset about failing to save Siegmeyer from the chaos eaters multiple times when Dark Souls was still new to me. I'm afraid to progress in my third Dark Souls III playthrough, because I may screw up the Yuria of Londor quest, which forced me to upgrade my character more than I wanted (to acquire the dark sigils) and I don't know when I'll feel like playing it a fourth time, especially with the DLCs coming. It also ties into the Anri of Astora quest. I gave up (for now) trying to understand the wiki articles and bought Dragon's Dogma instead. It was less overwhelming in Demon's Souls, since it was a smaller game.Fox12 said:Illustrated that it's possible that the audiance will miss large aspects of the game- and that's okay