Most disappointing game?

Recommended Videos

Andaxay

Thinking with Portals
Jun 4, 2008
513
0
0
shatnershaman said:
I 100% agree I liked 2 count them 2 songs in halo 2 even though there were like 40 (the halo theme's mjolnir remix and blow me away)
Mmm, the Mjolnir remix and Unyielding are really the only two I bothered putting on my iPod when someone lent me the CDs. I was a bit disappointed when the Mjolnir mix was a bit too easy to play on Guitar Hero, I was hoping it'd be a bit more challenging.

As for another disappointing one, I bought Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories for the GBA after countless people harped on about how good Kingdom Hearts is supposed to be. I absolutely hated it: repetetive gameplay, rubbish music and characters I couldn't actually give a flying stuff about (even Disney's best). After, I had people telling me I'd picked up a bad egg and should really try the PS2 games, but after that awful find I'd really been dissuaded from spending another £30 (this was when I was only about 13, too) on a game I'd probably hate.
 

Humpfester

New member
May 21, 2008
2
0
0
For the most any game that had a patch released before it hit the shelves. Game publishers are holding game developers at gun point and we all suffer. We all know who they are, Greedy bastard's.
 

bluemarsman

New member
Apr 6, 2008
202
0
0
Aidanadv said:
Sim City Societies. It is what made me hate EA and go running to Stardock for my RTS fix.

The only reason I might still have any hope for EA is Battlefield Heroes.
Ageed. Sim City =/= Casual Game
 

AdamBomb

New member
Jun 4, 2008
61
0
0
clericalerror said:
I would have to say "Smackdown vs RAW 2008" for me.

I completely agree with you. I too have been a huge Smackdown fan and bought EVERY SINGLE one of those games, until 08. I always rent before I buy, and I tried 08 and didn't even keep it for the full time I had it rented from Blockbuster. I was vastly disappointed.

I seem to have started a good little topic here :)
 

elimob441

New member
Jun 2, 2008
24
0
0
I reserved H3, when I got it, it seems missing alot, I kinda almost made myself think I was having fun, single was short and easy, multi seemed same old thing just more overpowering kids who played h2 and now mastered h3.

Timeshift was another, it seemed so cool, I got it, It wants to be to much and it is not, its a little fun to just pop in and kill a couple guys
 

Chemfire

New member
May 28, 2008
16
0
0
shatnershaman said:
Portal, wasn't fun wasn't funny short as hell.
You are very, very mistaken, except about the shortness, but it is allowed it's shortness because It does so well everywhere else.

And I can see from your Halo icon, that that's why you probably didn't like Portal.
 

Otterpoet

New member
Jun 6, 2008
273
0
0
My most recent and heartfelt disappointment is Assassin's Creed. Beautiful game, but an absolute snooze-fest. The story was dull and contrived, the protagonist was vacuous, and the mission design was pure drudgery. Playing it felt more like work than fun. And I doubt I've encountered a game that's worse for the sense of immersion. You'd think the designers could have written more than four lines of dialogue for the NPCs you're saving every other minute. I'm shocked that it remains so high on reviews' best-game lists.
 

Zoroastres

New member
Sep 13, 2007
20
0
0
MOST, eh... that's a hard one to finger. I'd say Daikatana, but I never really thought it'd be all that great to begin with. I'd say Fable, but I never bought into that hype. Age of Empires 3 deffinitely comes close (utterly horrid game) but it's not quite at the top of my list.... Legacy of Kain: Defiance--because the LAST game in the series didn't have a ****ing ending? No....

I know what it is: Neverwinter Nights. That game was painful for me, because I went into it after literally dedicating my life to the Baldur's Gate series. I expected it to be fantastic. Great writing. Interesting Characters. Fun gameplay. And I got... nothing.
 

Emperor Inferno

Elite Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,988
0
41
You know, Bloodrayne was fun and Rayne is really fine, but it wasnt as fun and Rayne wasnt as fine as I hoped. Maybe its taht my standards for women are a little too high.
 

zen5887

New member
Jan 31, 2008
2,923
0
0
Im gonna jump on this (small) "im not that big on portal" boat.

Dont get me wrong it was a nifty gimmick.. The portal gun is an awesome peice of design and programming on valves part. I just got frustraited with it.. Like.. At the start you making engergy balls go into the power thingy.. Then your making more engery balls go into the power thingy.. Then your making a bunch of energy balls go into power thingys from all over the room.. Then when you fail (which I did A LOT) you gotta do it all over again..

Im not saying it was a bad game so fanboys back off.. I just didnt like it..

Ooh that and the people who go "zomglawl teh cake is a lie!" over and over again annoy me..
 

PurpleRain

New member
Dec 2, 2007
5,001
0
0
zen5887 said:
Im gonna jump on this (small) "im not that big on portal" boat.

Dont get me wrong it was a nifty gimmick.. The portal gun is an awesome peice of design and programming on valves part. I just got frustraited with it.. Like.. At the start you making engergy balls go into the power thingy.. Then your making more engery balls go into the power thingy.. Then your making a bunch of energy balls go into power thingys from all over the room.. Then when you fail (which I did A LOT) you gotta do it all over again..

Im not saying it was a bad game so fanboys back off.. I just didnt like it..

Ooh that and the people who go "zomglawl teh cake is a lie!" over and over again annoy me..
But it was. Plus you can't walk on lies. It leads to a flaming wreck.
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
Crysis.

After Farcry, I expected better. Sure, the plot and characters were MUCH better in Crysis, but the gameplay was not. The guns all sucked horribly, and frankly when you're making a SHOOTER the guns need to be better! Crysis guns have horrible accuracy, as opposed to Farcry guns, the shotgun gets nerfed, the Rocket Launcher, originally a pile of fun in Farcry gets wussified, the submachine gun is crappy even at close range now, and the gatling gun is a raging pile of crap that you never have ammo for anyway. Of course, the reduction from 4 weapon slots to slots based on weapon type was annoying as hell, which meant only 2 rifle/shotgun slots (cause yeah, that pistol is worth having around instead of an extra rifle...)

The worst thing though is the poor accuracy of any of the guns. I loved Farcry because it mixed long range and close range combat so well, a thing I've not seen in ANY other shooter. Most shooter weapons suck horribly at long range, except for one sniper weapon thrown in to annoy you by requiring it in a couple spots, and being useless everywhere else. Conversely, about half the farcry weapons were very useful at long range, provided you took the time to aim. Somehow they even cocked up the machine guns in Crysis; in Farcry the big .50 on any jeep or mount could be used to take down things half a mile away, but in Crysis I had trouble hitting shit that I could peg with a thrown rock. So Crysis took a game where you snuck around in the jungle sniping chumps with your M4 to a game where you pretty much just run up and shoot them, soaking up any hits they send your way since you regenerate armor and health like a monster anyway, so there's barely any skill to it, especially with the worthless accuracy of any of the guns.

This seems to come up a lot actually. Focusing on close-range firefights made sense in Bioshock since space is clearly limited, but a lot of games with wide open areas have at most one weapon that's actually useful at long range, but you never have enough ammo to actually practice with the stupid thing, so you never use it. Farcry got away from that, and apparently the entire gaming industry thinks it's retarded for doing so.
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
Zoroastres said:
(snip)...

I know what it is: Neverwinter Nights. That game was painful for me, because I went into it after literally dedicating my life to the Baldur's Gate series. I expected it to be fantastic. Great writing. Interesting Characters. Fun gameplay. And I got... nothing.
I agree with that too... Baldur's Gate 2 was pretty damn fun, but Neverwinter... Well, most of the time I didn't know what I was doing or why, so I just ran around like a clueless twit and somehow advanced the plot anyway, with no real attachment to my character or any of the myriad NPCs I stumbled across. Some of the player-made modules were fun, but most were unplayable due to bugs (note: I only played 'finished' modules).
 

Samuel71

New member
Jun 7, 2008
30
0
0
HI!!!! THIS IS MY FIRST POST ON THE FORUM, MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!!

Man, I am way more awesome than all of you.
 

Hurray Forums

New member
Jun 4, 2008
397
0
0
Xenosaga 2 really bothered me in so many ways. For starters the E.S system was terribly boring, simple, and you were FORCED to use them. Second they needlessly changed the graphics, music, and voice acting. The orchestra piece's were replaced with an endless stream of techno, the characters changed in appearance pretty terribly along with some of the worst facial expressions I've ever seen in a game, and they got rid of perfectly good voice actors that fit their characters well and replaced them with mediocre actors that didn't fit at all. However, the biggest thing that bothered me was plot. Some of the main characters were nearly completely left out which is rather strange when Xenosaga 1 did such a good job including everyone. Also it was incredibly short due to the fact over half the game was dedicated to secret dungeons and stupid side quests that didn't advance the characters or story at all. Not good for a series that is defined by it's story alone. Finally the ending and final boss were so anti climatic and easy when the credits came up I was shocked that what I had just seen was the actual ending.
 

Credge

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,042
0
0
Either Vanguard or Hellgate. Both of those games ensured that I will never buy a PC game again without trying it first. This does not include the terrible demos of games they shovel out and try to pass off as what the game is actually like.
 
Feb 14, 2008
1,278
0
0
Quake 4... Yay, a goory Doom 3-like game with ton of monsters and cool marines... WRONG! IT SUCKS!
My rating of it:
Graphics: 8
Sound: 8
Single player: -5
Multiplayer: 3
Updating system: -248736
Average: -4964,4
 

Nikita89

New member
May 24, 2008
113
0
0
heroes of might and magic 4... after playing heroes 3 with all those great add-ons for ages, i was really looking forward to a newer (better?) version! but somehow they managed to screw up the whole game :(

EDIT: and WOW... i guess i just didn't get caught in the spider's web :p
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
Ok, I would agree xenosaga 2 sucked, but it wasn't much of a let down to me because I was fed up with Xenosaga 1 by the end of the game, and only played 2 because my roommate already owned it. Quake 4... I played the demo and said 'fuck this.' The graphics were almost cut/paste from doom 3, and the control and weapons actually felt worse. I've had enough of shooters that are entirely too dark to see crap for no good reason; sure, doom 3 tried to be a survival-horror kind of thing, and it did ok, but really the whole survival-horror thing looses a lot of kick when you're a marine or some other kill-happy sod.