Hahaha, I haven't purchased the DLC myself either. Like the majority, I watched it on YouTube.Daedalus1942 said:
most dissapointing game ending
- Thread starter cocoadog
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I realise this is what they wanted but it was so poorly executed. Instead of making it seem like a planned ending to defeat him once and for all, it just feels like the entire game was unnecessary prior to it as you practically wipe everything you ever did from existence.DigitalJedl said:
It was mainly just an excuse to add DLC and squeeze some more money out of people.
Wait, are you serious!? did you not pay attention to the characters in that agme at all!? Those "people" are Griggs, Price, Vasquez and Gaz.WorldCritic said:
Yeah, that's pretty much what happened.shaderkul said:
My vote for the most unnecessary epilogue goes to Final Fantasy VII:
500 years later, some grass grows. Whoop-de-fucking-doo.
I was gonna say Legacy of Kain Defiance since it kills off my most beloved character of the franchise Raziel, but then on reflection I hated most of it since the story was sh1t (unlike it's marvelous predecessors)offering no closure and crap gameplay but then again I played the PC version and a keybord is not suited for a fixed camera unlike a analog stick but then not too many games can pull off a fixed camera like God of War II did. Also Heavenly Sword had a crappy ending since Nariko was killed of... in this case I'll just say I was disappointed with all games that make you form an emotional attachment to a character and then kills him/her off.
I played the PC version, too... always fun executing a jump towards a crucial checkpoint and then soaring into the void - it was as if I could hear the game laughing a slapping its ass at me. -.-SousukeSeg said:
But I did like the ending, it pretty much tied everything up in a neat little bow... and let's face it, the story and the characters of LoK always made for a somewhat dark and depressing setting, so a storybook happy ending was never really an option anyway.
On topic, I'd have to say that the ending of 'Viking: Battle for Asgard' was a slap in the balls. Yes, many people tell me, "Why do you play that game?! Everything about it is downright abysmal!" ...but in my opinion, big angry vikings chopping up baddies and splitting heads (and not to mention their whole mythology) are made of awesomesauce, so nye.
BUT WHAT WAS UP WITH THAT ENDING?? How could they possibly think that would be a good idea?!
Not only were the comic book graphics of the cutscenes completely out of place, but as in PoP, Skarin ends up launching Ragnaroek... and in this case it's not even for the sake of a halfway likable character, but because he didn't get to bone an aloof goddess who looked like princess Leia on steroids!! And the storytelling in that outro made the awesome mythology of the Norse gods sound like something out of the nature-loving Native American lore bucket. -.-
Ubi originally planned to release more for PoP in the form of DLC to continue the story instead of releasing a whole new game all together.The Maddest March Hare said:
And you kind of start thinking that he will escape again anyway, they mention it most of the time. But whatever, I enjoyed the ending it was a nice twist for me. To each his own.
Ok, I can't believe that I had to rejester to be the first on to say this, but, LEGEND OF ZELDA TWILIGHT PRINCESS. That was the most WTF ending I have ever seen.
Hahaha, thanks. But seriously, How can that ending have made any sence to anyone apart from the makers?
yeah this was the most ridiculous ending ever.The Maddest March Hare said:
needless to say, i left her dead. good riddance.
