Most Evil Human In History Aside From the Big Two

Recommended Videos

Dr Jones

Join the Bob Dylan Fangroup!
Jun 23, 2010
819
0
0
GraveeKing said:
If ignorance, arrogance and any other form of stupidity, then I think a lot of people are a lot worse than Hitler, he wasn't terribly stupid either - I mean he DID completely fix up Germany's economy from the crap it was in.
Yeah, for about 10 years tops. During and after WWII Germany was fucked. More so than in the 30'ies. I think that the mess that he left them in kind of destroys the earlier 10 years..
 

Dizeazedkiller

New member
Feb 11, 2011
154
0
0
I can't really think of anyone being so evil that they should have never existed because a lot of people who are considered evil i find interesting and if it weren't for role models such as them our morals wouldn't be as solid and someone else would come along and do some horrible things.

As a side point though you didn't have to mention Hitler or Stalin at all. Why? Not because everyone would vote for their non-existence but because they are not evil. They were brilliant leaders and although their means weren't so crash hot it doesn't matter. The end justifies the means
 

GraveeKing

New member
Nov 15, 2009
621
0
0
Dr Jones said:
Yeah, for about 10 years tops. During and after WWII Germany was fucked. More so than in the 30'ies. I think that the mess that he left them in kind of destroys the earlier 10 years..
But as I keep saying, his intentions were to make Germany more powerful - I mean don't forget England declared war on him - not the other way around, HECK the fact we all bombed the living shit out of Germany - after they had more or less already lost too - would kind of make us more evil, since the only reason we bombed their city's back at the end of the war was to get revenge.
We had no good reason to bomb a country that had already more or less lost, it was similar to (although not as devastating as) America nuking Japan a couple of times at the end of their war.
 

Level 7 Dragon

Typo Kign
Mar 29, 2011
609
0
0
Well, first of all Stalin wasn't that evil. I know that or sure, since I'm Russian.

Well, if I started talking about Russian historical figures I can safely say Ivan the Terrible. Not only he was a crazy dictator, he also murdered his own son, ending the Ruricovich dynasty.

Also he was a crappy politician, most of the wars he started has cost Russia a lot of land :(
 

Dr Jones

Join the Bob Dylan Fangroup!
Jun 23, 2010
819
0
0
GraveeKing said:
But as I keep saying, his intentions were to make Germany more powerful - I mean don't forget England declared war on him - not the other way around, HECK the fact we all bombed the living shit out of Germany - after they had more or less already lost too - would kind of make us more evil, since the only reason we bombed their city's back at the end of the war was to get revenge.
We had no good reason to bomb a country that had already more or less lost, it was similar to (although not as devastating as) America nuking Japan a couple of times at the end of their war.
We had a perfect reason to bomb Germany, they did not give up. Even when Hitler had died in Berlin they did not give up. First after a couple of days later. As with Japan, they did not give up, AND NOTE that Truman did warn Tojo, but he didnt surrender.
The whole England declaring war on Germany being unfair thing aint really a good argument as Germany had just totally a**f***** another country called Poland (not to mention they also went on to take France, Denmark, Holland and so forth).
 

AMAZED

New member
Dec 6, 2010
170
0
0
Yureina said:
Vuljatar said:
Mao Zedong.
I second that. That guy was a sick egotistical bastard who killed tens of millions and made many more suffer because he desired such. For what? Politics? Vanity? Neglect?

That man was a monster.
yes FINALY someone acknowledges him as the mass murderer he is
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Undoubtedly, the most evil person in history is someone we have never heard of. Someone whom history has forgotten. Or maybe it was someone we will never heard of because said person only harmed a few individuals. Because, as horrible as genocide is, I imagine sometime in the violent history of our race, someone has tortured people for months or years at a time before finally killing them. Someone has probably done that to a person who would have called them a friend before they did it. Maybe Shan Yu, that quote from firefly: "Live with a man 40 years, share his house, meals, speak on every subject. Then tie him up, and hold him over the volcano's edge and on that day, you will finally meet the man.

TheCommie12 said:
Jesus? jokes, there is no such thing, the one of the most evil people is George W. Bush
Of the people whom history has known, I would actually say George W. He started a meaningless war which has destroyed an entire country, and taken many lives, and he did so without ever being called to account for it. Either him or Shan Yu.
 

Beertaster

New member
Jan 20, 2011
35
0
0
There's alot of easy choices.

Ghengis Khan, Attila the Hun, Pol Pot, Vlad Ţepeş ( Vlad the Impaler, and basis of Dracula), Ivan IV of Russia (Ivan the terrible), Slobodan Milosevic (Butcher of the Balkan's), Isabella of Castile (started the Spanish Inquisition, Ilse Koch (Witch of Buchenwald), Countess Elizabeth Bathory (lured women to her castle and torture/killed them)

If anyone's interested you should look up some of these people by either their names or their "titles"
 

GraveeKing

New member
Nov 15, 2009
621
0
0
Dr Jones said:
We had a perfect reason to bomb Germany, they did not give up. Even when Hitler had died in Berlin they did not give up. First after a couple of days later. As with Japan, they did not give up, AND NOTE that Truman did warn Tojo, but he didnt surrender.
The whole England declaring war on Germany being unfair thing aint really a good argument as Germany had just totally a**f***** another country called Poland (not to mention they also went on to take France, Denmark, Holland and so forth).
Just for a note - they were taking back a German city from Poland was one their reasons to invade, Denmark was barely even invaded - they were bombed with propaganda, and there were even Danish solders in the German army! And as for France.... Well nobody likes them anyway - Nah I kid, but really though, that was later.
Point is though they had a perfectly valid reason to invade - they'd even asked for the city back before since most of the people there SPOKE German and WERE German (or Prussian origins at least, but ya know same thing more or less).

And well look at it this way - you've already won, but bombing them isn't making them surrender - that's just the mass slaughter of innocent civilians. They've done their job - defended Poland - I think that would have been a better time to call an end...

Still fact is - as you're saying this is AFTER Hitler was killed, so we're getting off topic here the evil guy was dead, so let's get back on topic. Hitler invaded Poland to re-take the city basically (can't remember the name, just look around)
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
By dangerous I meant in slit the throat of the victem after they've had their fun for a few days, of course this is after they kept them locked in the basement like an animal. We have had a few cases where people have taken children and kept them as slaves. It happened in the US a couple years back, I can't remember the names but this person was kidnapped and used as a sex-slave of a pedophile for almost half of her life.
Dulcinea said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
You took that out of context.

OT: the man who raped me. Yeah, maybe selfish, but whatever.

Looking past myself, the most evil person in history would have to be... Hm... That's a tough call. So many ways to judge evil. I dunno. Too hard!

To both of you, I was just supporting the point that it's not having a sexual attraction to children that's wrong; it's actually having sex with them. I've never personally met any pedophiles, but I gather that there are quite a few who have an attraction yet understand that the actual sex would be wrong. I'm not sure I feel comfortable saying that kind of person is evil. The example of a solider was to say that the potential to do something shouldn't be counted the same as the act.
When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.
I know your probably sick of this little back and forth but how do you think they get stuff to "get off" to? A child somewhere has to be abused for them to get off to something ... I think it's all awful and seperating pedophile down into different groups is nothing but semantics.

On topic. That dutch (I think) man who hid his daughter in a tiny basement and had like 4 kids with her till she was 18. I think he also abused his and his daughters kids aswell.
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
AMAZED said:
Yureina said:
Vuljatar said:
Mao Zedong.
I second that. That guy was a sick egotistical bastard who killed tens of millions and made many more suffer because he desired such. For what? Politics? Vanity? Neglect?

That man was a monster.
yes FINALY someone acknowledges him as the mass murderer he is
I knew he was bad before, but then I ended up studying Communist China while in University. That... pretty much sealed the deal for me. He had absolutely no regard for human life and was pretty much focused completely on whatever political plans he had. By trying to "improve" China, he ended up creating a crazed personality cult and a chaotic political situation. All done with a gigantic human cost that ran up in the tens of millions that he never cared the slightest about. He was too busy with his own personal excesses to care about famine victims or the people murdered or driven to suicide in the name of his ideology.

Alas, China hasn't gotten much better since.
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Level 7 Dragon said:
Well, first of all Stalin wasn't that evil. I know that or sure, since I'm Russian.

Well, if I started talking about Russian historical figures I can safely say Ivan the Terrible. Not only he was a crazy dictator, he also murdered his own son, ending the Ruricovich dynasty.

Also he was a crappy politician, most of the wars he started has cost Russia a lot of land :(
You need to study Stalin my friend in a serious way. Your opinion of him will probably change... FAST.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
omega 616 said:
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
By dangerous I meant in slit the throat of the victem after they've had their fun for a few days, of course this is after they kept them locked in the basement like an animal. We have had a few cases where people have taken children and kept them as slaves. It happened in the US a couple years back, I can't remember the names but this person was kidnapped and used as a sex-slave of a pedophile for almost half of her life.
Dulcinea said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
You took that out of context.

OT: the man who raped me. Yeah, maybe selfish, but whatever.

Looking past myself, the most evil person in history would have to be... Hm... That's a tough call. So many ways to judge evil. I dunno. Too hard!

To both of you, I was just supporting the point that it's not having a sexual attraction to children that's wrong; it's actually having sex with them. I've never personally met any pedophiles, but I gather that there are quite a few who have an attraction yet understand that the actual sex would be wrong. I'm not sure I feel comfortable saying that kind of person is evil. The example of a solider was to say that the potential to do something shouldn't be counted the same as the act.
When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.
I know your probably sick of this little back and forth but how do you think they get stuff to "get off" to? A child somewhere has to be abused for them to get off to something ... I think it's all awful and seperating pedophile down into different groups is nothing but semantics.

On topic. That dutch (I think) man who hid his daughter in a tiny basement and had like 4 kids with her till she was 18. I think he also abused his and his daughters kids aswell.
I'm called a bigot for putting pedophiles on my list and I'm called an idiot for deciding to take them somewhat off it. Can't get away with fuck all it seems.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
Yureina said:
Level 7 Dragon said:
Well, first of all Stalin wasn't that evil. I know that or sure, since I'm Russian.

Well, if I started talking about Russian historical figures I can safely say Ivan the Terrible. Not only he was a crazy dictator, he also murdered his own son, ending the Ruricovich dynasty.

Also he was a crappy politician, most of the wars he started has cost Russia a lot of land :(
You need to study Stalin my friend in a serious way. Your opinion of him will probably change... FAST.
I always wonder what would have been if Trotsky succeded Lenin and things like Valkayrie were a sucess where Hitlers best generals were put in charge in stead of executed.