Most ridiculous thing touted as "art"

Recommended Videos

daubie

New member
Mar 17, 2010
100
0
0
There was a guy at an art show. His display was a series of blenders with goldfish swimming around in them. Oh, and they were plugged in. I think the people running the event tried to get him to leave after someone turned on of the blenders on.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,941
0
0
Art is all about opinion, as many Escapees have previously stated. One person's trash, another's treasure, right?
I agree that being so open is allowing a lot of idiots to make a lot of money for a lot of bullshit. But there are still, even amongst modern artists, really good pieces, that are made from simple things. Also, things that you see in reality are often MUCH more artistic that when you see a replica in a boom or an a screen.

EDIT: In case you want an example, check out Cildo Meireles room of numbers. It has loads of clocks and rulers and magnetic numbers everywhere. It's pretty epic. It was here at the Tate, and was pretty awesome, anyways, see if you can find some images. I could, unfortunately, not. But then I didn't really look. http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/cildomeireles/about.shtm
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
Minimalist paintings are not art, in my opinion. Anyone can draw a circle or a square on a piece of paper and attach any silly hidden meanings to it and when you call them out on it they scoff at you and say you just don't get it. I wish I could remember who it was or the whole story, but there was once a guy who wrote a fake book about a fake artist and a bunch of art critics came together and talked about how much they appreciated his work even though he didn't exist... which basically is a real life Emperor's New Clothes and destroys the credibility of most art critics who pretend they understand the deeper philosophical meanings of a white canvas with some red lines on it.

What's worse is that garbage is considered art while people just write stuff like this off as silly:


That's more art than anything you could find in a museum.
 

gl1koz3

New member
May 24, 2010
931
0
0
Personally, great attention to detail that manifests in a message is art. All else is sport. Drawing a fracking filled black rectangle is just so NOT full of art... it's incomprehensible. I can be pumping this shit all day. Where's mastery in this?

Message? Ok. Great attention to detail? Not so much.
 

DeathChairOfHell

New member
Dec 31, 2009
658
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
You can throw a load of different paint colours on a canvas and make some "insightful" bullshit about what it means and make millions!
only if you're famous, that is.
 

sageoftruth

New member
Jan 29, 2010
3,417
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
Billion Backs said:
Considering your post, OP, you're not getting what art's about.

Everything is art.
sadfhyjmdgrw\adsc vxbdekjwa\dhuv

See that?
I demand $1'000'000 for that line!

See what we're getting at?
However, just because it is art doesn't mean someone should pay $1,000,000 for it. I think the big mistake is putting the word "art" on a pedestal. It should be more mundane, like "tool" or "mammal". Ironically, despite your intentions, sadfhyjmdgrw/adsc vxbdekjwa/dhuv could be considered a creative commentary on the sad state of people and modernism. Congradulations! You just made art.
 

no oneder

New member
Jul 11, 2010
1,243
0
0
Anything in the Bauhaus movement. That is awful.

Bauhaus buildings on the other side are quite the shit.
 

TheXRatedDodo

New member
Jan 7, 2009
445
0
0
Doinstuffman38 said:
Demented Teddy said:
You can throw a load of different paint colours on a canvas and make some "insightful" bullshit about what it means and make millions!
Like Jackson Pollock?


Autumn Rhythm... Yep... it's a "painting".
I would never pay for a painting such as that, mostly because artists are generally egotistical assholes who think their work is worth millions when really art should be something that is more free than the air we breathe, but as a painting, I think it's quite beautiful.
If something inside him just clicked one day and said "you NEED to go and throw a fuck load of paint at a massive piece of canvas" either as a stress reliever or a form of self expression, why not? As long as it comes from somewhere pure and honest, I have no problems with any of it.
It's just when it starts to become all about THE DAILY STRUGGLE OF TEH MODERN SOCIETIEZ HURRDURRR and it's a chair painted white in a room full of lobotomised jack russels then I get pissed off. Fuck pretense.
I however, whether you dislike or like that painting, defy you to call it pretentious.
 

Marmooset

New member
Mar 29, 2010
895
0
0
OceanRunner said:
Personally I think that whether or not something is art is a matter of opinion. After all, some of the things I've heard about that are called art to be utterly ridiculous. The most prominent example to me would be Tracy Emin's "My Bed". It makes no sense to show of some messy, unmade bed and call it "art".
It's all fair game. Art is in the intent, and in evoking a reaction.

And guess what? Those pieces of art that really piss you off? Well they got a reaction out of you, didn't they? You've just validated them as art. Congratulations!
 

Ithos

New member
Jul 20, 2009
254
0
0
I read something about a guy who chained a dog that was starving to death in a corner and called it art.
 

The3rdEye

New member
Mar 19, 2009
460
0
0
tomtom94 said:
Someone starved a dog half to death and called it art.
I remember reading a little about this. Pretty messed up in a number of ways. There was also (not in the same show but in a similar vein of weird) the coat made of raw meat and the statues made of fecal matter.
 

Gotham Soul

New member
Aug 12, 2008
809
0
0
I've heard people call video games art. Pfah, what idiots.

Kidding. Anyway, to quote Yahtzee, you can wipe your ass with a page of Megaman sprites and there's still someone on Comics Genesis who'll say its brilliant. That being said, you could probably bring up a blank canvas and if you make insightful comments about it you can sell it to just about anyone.
 

coldfrog

Can you feel around inside?
Dec 22, 2008
1,320
0
0
IcyEvils said:
OT, we also had to do a study of this joker's art- Sean Scully. He pumps out this tripe all year and gets lauded for it.



Soylent Bacon said:
I saw a "work of art" hanging up outside a theatre before that just had rectangles. I don't remember specifically how many, but it was around two or three rectangles. They had primary colors. The whole picture was about the size of a sheet of notebook paper. Give me a break.

Actually, it might have been this:
In my opinion, at least this stuff has some aesthetic value. Sure, you can say "anyone can do this" but the fact is, no one else did. Some of this abstract art I think doesn't have to have any meaning behind it, though I bet it usually does, but if someone can look at it and say "That's pleasing to the eye" then I think it's worth it. Hell, even to some extent, the "squares" mentioned earlier could be interesting to look at, but I'm kinda wary of them.

Selling your own crap in a jar though... No. Just no.
 

Divine Miss Bee

avatar under maintenance
Feb 16, 2010
730
0
0
i once saw a gray suit hanging on the wall of the museum of modern art. that one threw me for a second. it was supposed to be about how "empty" corporate america is, but it was just a suit, hanging on a wall.
 

Reenix

New member
Mar 21, 2010
137
0
0
OceanRunner said:
Personally I think that whether or not something is art is a matter of opinion. After all, some of the things I've heard about that are called art to be utterly ridiculous. The most prominent example to me would be Tracy Emin's "My Bed". It makes no sense to show of some messy, unmade bed and call it "art".
To be fair, she is from Margate. And I live close enough to that ghost dump to understand why someone to would call that art xD

Then again, they DID burn a 90-foot man made of furniture in the Dreamland amusement park...