Squarez said:
I know the plot in one of the greatest fantasy books of al time totally sucks, right?
And in defense of the CGI, it was made in 2001, so for the time they were amazing, and still stand up very well by today's standards. Im, not a LOTR fanboy, I can think of many criticisms of the films, but I don't think the plot and the CGI can be one of them without very good reason.
uuuummmmmmm . . . are you shitting me? Did you not realize that the movie was based on a book? Not only a book but a book that might as well be the basis for the entire fantasy genre of the last 20 years. I guess the storyline was predictable if you predicted that the ring got destroyed in the end, but otherwise it was a truly fantastic movie that as far as i'm concerned, deserved all the praise it got.
Hi. This is a thread about movies that everyone else likes, except me (or you if you're the one posting something).
Saying that a movie based on a good book, is a good movie, is just a bad argument. It it can be used as one at all.
Unless you find The Da Vinci Code, Eragon, Chronicles of Narnia to be good movies, then the argument simply doesn't work to disprove my opinion from your perspective (which it won't anyway, because it simply is MY opinion). Please note that I'm NOT saying that all movies based on novels are bad. I'm just saying that they're not all good, as a counter-argument.
And to add another to the list: Transformers. I facepalmed when I saw them zoom in the camera for 3 seconds on a memory card (it's shiny!), I facepalmed when I saw a mountain dew-bot, I facepalmed with each dread-awful 'joke' they forced into it and I FACEPALMED AT THE NONSENSICAL ENDING. The whole time they're saying that they need to keep that thingamajig away from the decepticons, and in the end, a bad actor finishes off the bad guy by pushing said thing into the bad guy's chest. And an obligatory cheesy, stupid romance subplot on top of that. I'm never watching a Michael Bay movie again.
And someone here mentioned Star Wars. I concur.