Murders and Rapes 500 ? Sentenced to House Arrest

Recommended Videos

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
gigastar said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
And Japan clearly wasn't expecting it.
Gloss over the fact that when the Circum-Pacific War started not even America expected to be using the nukes.

And its also Japans fault. "Half the battle is knowing" and at the time all Japan thought they needed to know was that victory was theirs by divine right and where they had to go to demonstrate it to those who opposed them.
I didn't say that quote.

Smooth move, lol.
 

Artemis923

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,496
0
0
gigastar said:
Artemis923 said:
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!
SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE!
Were you waiting to post that, or did you spend a few minuites thinking about how to turn that guy into a jittering pile of rage the quickest?
Hehe. Mayhaps a bit of both.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
gigastar said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
And Japan clearly wasn't expecting it.
Gloss over the fact that when the Circum-Pacific War started not even America expected to be using the nukes.

And its also Japans fault. "Half the battle is knowing" and at the time all Japan thought they needed to know was that victory was theirs by divine right and where they had to go to demonstrate it to those who opposed them.
I didn't say that quote.

Smooth move, lol.
Oh, youre right there. No idea how i managed to get the wrong quotee.
 

Zeema

The Furry Gamer
Jun 29, 2010
4,580
0
0
Well the thing about Mai Lai, is that they were ordered too. alot of Soliders are told too and if they didn't do it they would get shot or worse. of course it was a terrible event. But there is no way you could find out who did what.
 

NiPah

New member
May 8, 2009
1,084
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
NiPah said:
judging a situation like this from the comfort of a modern Western lifestyle is the ultimate hypocrisy.
You should look up what hypocrisy means. I don't think it means what you think it means.

a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles,
etc., that one does not really possess
You're judging the acts of war as evil when your lifestyle was built on those acts of war that you claim is a broken system. If you felt the acts of Hitler were evil and what the allies did was good, then do you also defend the necessary atrocities committed by the allies during the war?
War is hell, the people who try to make war more civilized and clean are the people who aren't fighting, and are the first voices to fall silent when war is truly needed.

And no, I didn't mean to use the word hypocrite, you're not stating a contradiction, I'm saying you're more like the pot calling the kettle black.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
NiPah said:
You're judging the acts of war as evil when your lifestyle was built on those acts of war that you claim is a broken system.
NiPah said:
If you felt the acts of Hitler were evil and what the allies did was good, then do you also defend the necessary atrocities committed by the allies during the war?
You assume I live in one such country. You assume I live a lifestyle only available due to "acts of war"--and for the record, murdering a village of innocent women and children, mutilating their bodies and burning their homes down is an act of sociopathy, not war. You assume I feel the acts of Hitler were evil. You assume I supported the Allied Forces.

Woah. That's a lot of assumptions.

Pretty sure they have an expression that deals with that.

P.S.: I would only be a hypocrite if I was slaughtering innocent people while condemning it here. You're overstretching the word and using it incorrectly. The more you know!
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
Kendarik said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Few people know this event ever occurred.

The system is broken.
You might have just heard about this somewhere, but most people know about it if they know anything about history.

As for the system being broken, and example from 40+ years ago tells you nothing about the state of things today.
The same laws regarding the punishment of individual troops still stand. And ask a random person or two what My Lai is. See what they say.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Thyunda said:
It was war. War THEY started. You do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot. Even if it means hitting their civilians. The idea being that you demonstrate your willingness to do something like that. Tends to dissuade people in future. I would be on the other side of the argument had Germany and Japan not been the aggressors in World War II, but the fact remains, they started it. They attacked, unprovoked. It was just unfortunate for them that America wasn't willing to play fair. And rightly so.

You do not start a war unless you're prepared to risk your own people. And Japan clearly wasn't expecting it.

The next country to consider starting a war will think twice. Well. Unless this apologist crap carries on.
So we can all be dismissive of 9/11 and every dead U.S., U.K. and Australian soldier, right? Everyone that died in the towers was just "what you gotta do to win"?

"It was a war and we started it," right?

"They aren't willing to play fair. And rightly so," yeah?

"Do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot," you say?

Maybe next time a bomb goes off in the U.S. and civilians die you won't feel so bad. Or when a train in the U.K. is hijacked and suicide bombed you will say "hey, that's war". What's a few dead civilians from a suicide bomb or a train accident? Don't go to war if you don't want to risk your people, yeah?

Christ.
Yes. That is exactly what I'm saying. Maybe then people will understand that war is not some fucking game. It is serious business. While our countries are actively destabilising theirs', they react how they see fit. They can't very well take down a tank column, so they hit us where they can.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
Thyunda said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Thyunda said:
It was war. War THEY started. You do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot. Even if it means hitting their civilians. The idea being that you demonstrate your willingness to do something like that. Tends to dissuade people in future. I would be on the other side of the argument had Germany and Japan not been the aggressors in World War II, but the fact remains, they started it. They attacked, unprovoked. It was just unfortunate for them that America wasn't willing to play fair. And rightly so.

You do not start a war unless you're prepared to risk your own people. And Japan clearly wasn't expecting it.

The next country to consider starting a war will think twice. Well. Unless this apologist crap carries on.
So we can all be dismissive of 9/11 and every dead U.S., U.K. and Australian soldier, right? Everyone that died in the towers was just "what you gotta do to win"?

"It was a war and we started it," right?

"They aren't willing to play fair. And rightly so," yeah?

"Do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot," you say?

Maybe next time a bomb goes off in the U.S. and civilians die you won't feel so bad. Or when a train in the U.K. is hijacked and suicide bombed you will say "hey, that's war". What's a few dead civilians from a suicide bomb or a train accident? Don't go to war if you don't want to risk your people, yeah?

Christ.
Yes. That is exactly what I'm saying. Maybe then people will understand that war is not some fucking game. It is serious business. While our countries are actively destabilising theirs', they react how they see fit. They can't very well take down a tank column, so they hit us where they can.
Go ahead and tell that to someone who lost a family member in an attack. See how well that mentality goes over.

I feel like people who have never lived a day on Earth are replying to me >_>
 

Sansha

There's a principle in business
Nov 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Well I'm glad you decided to wait forty-four years to report this.

No, this kind of thing is never acceptable. There aren't excuses outside being psychopathic, or your personality blinded/numbed by the war you've already been through. Operating on orders, mind, does provoke some leniency in my perspective because, like someone already said, insubordination in wartime is punishable by death. On the spot.
And you're trained, hard, while in the military to obey orders without question. Most of these soldiers probably justified their actions to themselves as a coping mechanism to be able to emotionally deal with what they've been effectively forced to do under threat of death and dishonor. And, frankly, even if you maintained 'no' to your C.O, you'd be shot and killed on the spot and the massacre would happen anyway.

The system back then was fucked. Full of corruption, buddy systems and insanity. Shit like this has always happened in human history - it's just never been reported until the 20th century technology made it possible to leak such atrocities. It still happens, and we find out about it the next day and it can't be swept under the rug like this incident.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Animyr said:
I thought My Lai was kinda well known. There are books about it and everything.
Ask a few random people the following:

"What is My Lai?"

It's heartbreaking that so many people were so brutally massacred and your average person has no damn clue. If it happens in America, the world hears about it for a week. Happens somewhere else or at the hands of Americans, "these things happen."
Well, if your asking the modern day person, would they be likely to remember an acrosity from Vietnam, when its possible they are to young to even remember it? Plus, unless you (like me) go to college and take several history courses, you probably only going to see Vietnam as a single paragraph in most highschool textbooks. I had a course in American history that had a whole chapter dedicated to Vietnam, it was an eye opening experience.

Point is, you cant expect people to get worked up over something they dont know about. You cant get through a history course in middle or high school without going through WWII and hearing about the Holocaust. Thats why everybody knows it. Vietnam, most people only remember it for hippies, drugs, and Rock n' Roll... basically everything you see in movies like Platoon, Apocolypse Now and Full Metal Jacket. And God help you if you think those are 100% accurate depictions of what happened...
 

Sansha

There's a principle in business
Nov 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Thyunda said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Thyunda said:
It was war. War THEY started. You do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot. Even if it means hitting their civilians. The idea being that you demonstrate your willingness to do something like that. Tends to dissuade people in future. I would be on the other side of the argument had Germany and Japan not been the aggressors in World War II, but the fact remains, they started it. They attacked, unprovoked. It was just unfortunate for them that America wasn't willing to play fair. And rightly so.

You do not start a war unless you're prepared to risk your own people. And Japan clearly wasn't expecting it.

The next country to consider starting a war will think twice. Well. Unless this apologist crap carries on.
So we can all be dismissive of 9/11 and every dead U.S., U.K. and Australian soldier, right? Everyone that died in the towers was just "what you gotta do to win"?

"It was a war and we started it," right?

"They aren't willing to play fair. And rightly so," yeah?

"Do what you can to win, even if it means taking the cheap shot," you say?

Maybe next time a bomb goes off in the U.S. and civilians die you won't feel so bad. Or when a train in the U.K. is hijacked and suicide bombed you will say "hey, that's war". What's a few dead civilians from a suicide bomb or a train accident? Don't go to war if you don't want to risk your people, yeah?

Christ.
Yes. That is exactly what I'm saying. Maybe then people will understand that war is not some fucking game. It is serious business. While our countries are actively destabilising theirs', they react how they see fit. They can't very well take down a tank column, so they hit us where they can.
Go ahead and tell that to someone who lost a family member in an attack. See how well that mentality goes over.

I feel like people who have never lived a day on Earth are replying to me >_>
I don't want to be a part of this argument but I feel compelled to remind you that this is all part of the horrible reality of war. People, soldiers and civilians, men, women and children, will suffer and die. It's horrible, I wish it didn't have to happen and I wish people would stop hurting one another, but this is the reality of war.
Every single nation has at some point done something this horrible, and individuals within those militaries not acting on orders have done them too.

I believe nobody actually wants to be at war except for a few cold, evil administrations. We shouldn't have to babysit the Middle East, and the nations that are doing that don't have to be fucking it up time and time again. But we do, and they do.

It's a horrid reality, but it's reality - until people of different cultures, powers and beliefs can learn to respect and care for one another, they're going to find ways to kill one another.
As it's been said, war isn't a game, it's serious. And nobody is invincible. That's what terrorists want to prove - the most powerful nations in our developed world like England and the United States are not untouchable and cannot get away with whatever they like.
 

XSTALKERX

New member
Mar 10, 2012
94
0
0
Is it wrong of me to feel more bad for the pets and animals that was slain than the actual people caught in the middle of all this ?
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Artemis923 said:
Vietnam was fucked up. Cool story, bro...
That may be the most disgusting thing I have ever heard a human being say...
1. Vietnam (the war, that is) WAS fucked up!
2. There's more behind My Lai than some 2nd Lieutenant suddenly getting the idea to "Kill everyone".
3. You heard who say what? Cool story...
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
Sansha said:
We shouldn't have to babysit the Middle East [...] but we do.
Aaannddd you lost me.



The countries are fine. Go away.​
XSTALKERX said:
Is it wrong of me to feel more bad for the pets and animals that was slain than the actual people caught in the middle of all this ?
It might, lol.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
Kendarik said:
Find a recent example of the same type of situation in the US or your are complaining about nothing.
How about gunning down unarmed civilians and mocking them as they die and not being punished?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/05/wikileaks-us-army-iraq-attack
 

Sansha

There's a principle in business
Nov 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Sansha said:
We shouldn't have to babysit the Middle East [...] but we do.
Aaannddd you lost me.



The countries are fine. Go away.​
I'm not referring to US foreign policy. I'm not American. I think the Americans absolutely need to fuck off from the Middle East and never return.
What I'm referring to is the very real ideal that Middle Eastern nations, namely Israel and Pakistan, will just not stop being viciously determined to kill each other, and that they might become capable of going nuclear on each other happens to be everybody's problem.

The nations and cultures don't need to be freed from themselves or terrorists, or even each other. They don't need democracy or Western lifestyles. I believe they should be left alone - and frankly I'd love to see them blow each other apart and finally resolve whatever problems they have. But it's not acceptable to let them go nuclear. So, we shouldn't have to but we do.