MW2 or Dragon Age

Recommended Videos

CmdrGoob

New member
Oct 5, 2008
887
0
0
Timmaaaah said:
chinese_democracy said:
If you want a single player experience, get the RPG. If you want the multiplayer experience, get the shooter. This formula hasn't changed in 10+ years. Next case please.
MW 2 has a sweeet campaign, and revolves around the skill of the player rather than bullshit stat building. In my opinion it's better in the case of characters, story, single player gameplay AND multiplayer gameplay.

Buuuuut Dragonage has atmosphere I'll admit but it's the same as all the other generic fantasy RPG games
LOL what? MW2 has a 5 hour generic shooty campaign. The only thing not generic about it is how stupid, unrealistic and nonsensical the story is, and that's not a good thing. If you've played MW1, the campaign and multiplayer is deja vu to the max, it's barely changed the formula enough to be an expansion pack.
 

Fritzvalt

Amazing Human Being
May 12, 2009
447
0
0
Gxas said:
"No, no. I prefer barrels much more than pocket watches"
Your barrels are NOTHING compared to my pocket watches. NOTHING I SAY!

OP: If you want a deep, enthralling story in a fantasy landscape filled with fights that truely make you feel like a badass, go with DA:O

If you're looking for a frantic, fast paced shooter with a strong multiplayer community complete with guns and grenades and terrorism, hit up MW2.

Both are fun games, so it's a matter of what YOU feel like playing. Please, please don't take all your cues from Mr. Yahtzee. While amusing, he has a nasty habit of exagerating every little problem.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
squid5580 said:
Glefistus said:
Dragon Age definitely, I don't see any comparison between the two.
Both offer the chance to slaughter some innocent civilians?

And you are questioning your purchase on the ZP review? The one where he said he was 25 hours in and wanted to see more? That review?
If you play an evil prick, you party members turn on you, innocent civilians sometimes get caught in the crossfire during fights (making fireballs quite a large source of entertainment), and you can make deals with demons. What's not to like?
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
I say both. They are both excellent and well made games. I say buy one and ask if you can get the other one for Christmas.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Naheal said:
squid5580 said:
Glefistus said:
Dragon Age definitely, I don't see any comparison between the two.
Both offer the chance to slaughter some innocent civilians?

And you are questioning your purchase on the ZP review? The one where he said he was 25 hours in and wanted to see more? That review?
If you play an evil prick, you party members turn on you, innocent civilians sometimes get caught in the crossfire during fights (making fireballs quite a large source of entertainment), and you can make deals with demons. What's not to like?
Where is the fun in that when you can scare off protesters who are complaining about price gouging and let them starve and die. Or mock a little girl who lost her mommy? Now that is good evil fun. (Yeah I haven't made it very far yet even though I have invested a good 20 hours into it)
 

CmdrGoob

New member
Oct 5, 2008
887
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
CmdrGoob said:
Dragon Age is the best RPG in years (since BG2, even).
MW2 isn't even really better than MW1.
Mw2 improved on everything that made MW1 epic.
Also. No RPG can come close to Morrowind.
What, like the PC multiplayer? No. The story? No, it's gone bonkers instead of being realistic. The gameplay? No, the stupid strawberry jam damage is really annoying. The perks are better, but in many other ways it's either formulaic and similar or worse.
 

chinese_democracy

New member
Aug 22, 2009
159
0
0
Timmaaaah said:
chinese_democracy said:
If you want a single player experience, get the RPG. If you want the multiplayer experience, get the shooter. This formula hasn't changed in 10+ years. Next case please.
MW 2 has a sweeet campaign, and revolves around the skill of the player rather than bullshit stat building. In my opinion it's better in the case of characters, story, single player gameplay AND multiplayer gameplay.

Buuuuut Dragonage has atmosphere I'll admit but it's the same as all the other generic fantasy RPG games
The campaign was fun but its more like an added bonus to the multiplayer experience. I beat it in 3-4 hours. And I think the story and characters of MW2 are way over-hyped. They story lacked cohesion and was full of plot holes. Even in the case of a "what if" scenario, it is implausible and leaves too many unanswered questions (IW often forgets that the story is in the small details). The characters were nothing special either, they had decent voice actors with funny accents. MW2 is very fun, don't get me wrong, but I would never buy it for the single player experience and thus still fits my original formula.
 

Poomanchu745

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,582
0
0
Ya DA:O if you are into crazy long story and MW2 if you live for MP. I have both and if I had to choose one I would probably pick DA. Ya I mean the only thing bad ZP had to say about DA was that it was stereotypical fantasy with elves and shit. He never really mentioned the gameplay because it is soooo good.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
squid5580 said:
Where is the fun in that when you can scare off protesters who are complaining about price gouging and let them starve and die. Or mock a little girl who lost her mommy? Now that is good evil fun. (Yeah I haven't made it very far yet even though I have invested a good 20 hours into it)
Funny thing about that merchant...
You can kill him after the protesters get scared off
 

CD-R

New member
Mar 1, 2009
1,355
0
0
dillirgaf said:
The only thing i took from the ZP review was the Carbon Copy aspect, I play a lot of fantasy games and was wondering if there was anything spectacularly different about it. Oh and for the PS3 by the by
Well the dwarves are actually interesting. They aren't just short drunken Scotsman with axes. (and quite a few of them have cornrow haircuts for some reason).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS2pAvntfms

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCoKq6PI3WM

I haven't played MW2 but I can safely say dragon Age is definitely worth it. The story so far is amazing. If you liked Knights of the Old Republic or Neverwinter Nights you'll like Dragon Age. I don't why you thought Yahtzee didn't like it he said he's still playing it after 25 hours. It really is that addictive. Oh yeah and unlike MW2, DA:O will allow mods.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Dragon age if you're playing on PC, MW2 if you're playing on console.
 

blood77

New member
Apr 23, 2008
611
0
0
Glefistus said:
squid5580 said:
Glefistus said:
Dragon Age definitely, I don't see any comparison between the two.
Both offer the chance to slaughter some innocent civilians?

And you are questioning your purchase on the ZP review? The one where he said he was 25 hours in and wanted to see more? That review?
I didn't actually watch that review yet, I've played the game. You people on this site need to stop treating Yahtzee like an omniscient executive on games.
Agreed, he is not the end all decision maker on what games are good and what games are bad. He is, however, very good at pointing certain things to consider when you are thinking about purchasing a game. So lets just leave it at that and not turn this into a Yahtzee fight.

Anyway, getting back to the main topic at hand, I guess it mainly depends what you like doing more on you Saturday nights. Do you either want to be running around different maps with other people trying to kill other players/complete objectives or do you want to play a really good RPG?

Unfortunately I am facing the same dilemma, and what is worse yet is that I have two games that each fill one of those categories, so my previous buying strategy of "fill the genres" can't work.
 

gbemery

New member
Jun 27, 2009
907
0
0
dillirgaf said:
Was wondering what should be my next purchase? Modern Warfare 2 or Dragon Age: Origins
Just finished Demon's Souls and Dragon Age was looking like my next purchase until the ZP review.
MW2 has been getting rave reviews and I need me some head shot fix. So just wondering, thanks.
Yeah I know that is such a hard decision to make on your own./sarcasm Are you going to ask us for advice when you can't choose what to eat?

OT: pretty much if you want something with a short single player but plenty of multi then MW2 if you want a long single player story then DA:O. Both great depending on your mood...which falls right back to making your own decision not whether or not the public gives you a yeah or nay.
 

ReepNeep

New member
Jan 21, 2008
461
0
0
dillirgaf said:
The only thing i took from the ZP review was the Carbon Copy aspect, I play a lot of fantasy games and was wondering if there was anything spectacularly different about it. Oh and for the PS3 by the by
Yes, there is. The game seems like a weird amalgam of LoTR, Warhammer and the Witcher. What it borrows from the Witcher is the very modern shades of grey outlook. There quite often is no "good" option, only a choice between several bad ones.

Sure it has elves, dwarves and dragons. It also presents them in a far more realistic and interesting way than you would expect from Mr. Crowshaw's rant (I usually agree with the man, but he got this one very, very wrong) or what you would expect from other works in a high fantasy setting. Racism, rape, murder, genocide, avarice, betrayal, regicide, underhanded politcs, its a very dark game. The writing is excellent, head and shoulders above Bioware's very high standards.

Dragon Age all the way, for me.
 

101194

New member
Nov 11, 2008
5,015
0
0
Dragon mother F#@#$ing AGE IT"S INCREDIBLE I CAN"T *withdrawl kicks in and plays dragonage*