MW2 Worst Weapon?
- Thread starter RUINER ACTUAL
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Insomniactk said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_metal_jacket_bulletarc1991 said:
Armor-Piercing rounds(Do note that in some cases FMJ would make less damage)
And OnT: F2000, ACR is more accurate, Mini-Uzi kills faster... etc
[edit]
ahh yeh forgot about them XD
Ninja ninjaing my FMJ-part.
I just have an issue with any dual weapons in the game. It's just too much of a gamebreaker for me. Tactics go out the window when everyone is running around with dual 1887's I thought COD was supposed to be somewhat realistic.CORRODED SIN said:
I found the starting rocket launcher to be beyond terrible. It only comes with one shot, and you cant kill any of the air support with 1 round.... ok, maybe you can with danger close, but by the time you've unlocked that you've unlocked the far superior stinger!
regarding the 'cheapness' of some guns, i really dont understand how or why akimbo shotguns are so accurate, long range and awesome killing power, when akimbo anything else is a good way to see your accuracy head to about 0.001%
regarding the 'cheapness' of some guns, i really dont understand how or why akimbo shotguns are so accurate, long range and awesome killing power, when akimbo anything else is a good way to see your accuracy head to about 0.001%
Its because apparently it shows or gives a sense of skill because of the bolt action, i'm using it to get the mastery and then go back to the Barrett but it is fun to kill someone with the Int.ryuke2009 said:
Played a match recently with 2 8 years old talking about how their clan is so cool, that you need a K/D ratio of over 2 and that you need to have had a nuke 20 times or moree2density said:
Don't know how they were going to prove that last one...
I tried out the Deagle in MW2, and went straight back to the M9. I couldn't hit a god damn thing at point blank range, and even using the ironsights it took me four shots to kill a guy I was about three feet away from. Combine that with the small clip and one extra mag, what's the point? Had similar frustrating with the TMP - there's no reason to use any machine pistols than the PP2K and the G18. And the G18 (even though I love it) is an overpowered bullethose, especially if you unlock akimbo - which you will, in about three games.Instant K4rma said:
No one said sentry guns?That thing can be taken out just by one slash of a knife and stun and flash can disable them.
By intervention, I'm going to make a SWAG and say it's the Chey-Tac Intervention? Chambered .408 CheyTac? With a bullet so ballistically sound it hits with more kinetic energy than a .50 BMG outside past 700 meters. The .50BMG isn't quite as good ballistically, and it loses energy in flight. By the time it hits the 700 meter mark, the CheyTac is the more powerful round, even if it's lacking the BMGs greater mass.Slayer_2 said:
The more ya know...
EDIT: Yeah, totally don't play MW2. I would, but my PS3's doing it's best 360 impression at the moment.
Pet hate is all, particularly in games that like to boast they are bringing near as possible realistic battles to your screen. The term realism gets thrown around so easily by the games marketing heads seeking to find a way to elevate their games above 'just another standard FPS.' To the point it now has no meaning! They always seem to do something like this, incorporating the standard FPS type physics and rubbing that fact in with something 'flashy' introduction like these throwing knives.LordCuthberton said:
For once I would like a game that boasts the down right and dirty combat that you would see in real life to not push realistic physics to the side. Sure, it would be harder to implement a system which incorporates real physics and finds new ways to interface a feeling being to a unfeeling machine but if your not even going to try... well why bother trying to use realism as a marketing ploy?
Realism shouldn't be a meaningless catch phrase.
Long-distance sniping in MW2 is about 200 meters. Most maps you end up within 50 meters of your target. The only time you use the Barrett somewhat realistically is in CoD4, when you have to assassinate the bad guy, I forget his name. I believe he's about 800 meters away, and you have to deal with what I assume is a VERY exaggerated wind and Coriolis effect. The Barrett is even mounted and everything, although it has infinite ammo with no need to reload. Either way, I'm pretty sure a .50 round in the chest from 100 meters away would put you out of commission. IW should have really worked on the way they laid out weapon unlocks and the weapon stats, CoD4 was much better in this way.