If a game is voluntarily and repeatedly played by millions of people, and enjoyed by so many, how can your personal taste negate that? Ill say that a great game needs to do some innovative and daring things, but how can, "It is enjoyed by millions" amount to anything less then, "Good" without positively reeking of pretentiousness?Andrew Vandersteen said:That's not a sane definition of a good game. because a lot of people like something does not make it good. Millions of people like Twighlight or Justin Beiber, and those are horrible. No, a good game has a well written story, great characters, fun and enticing gameplay, and a lasting appeal in both single and multiplayer. the COD franchise hasn't had any of that for me since MW1Xanadu84 said:The problem is that, "Game connisuer who doesn't care about Call of Duty and wishes it would go away" is by this point more of a hackneyed cliche then Modern Warfare. At least Modern Warfare has polish.
You don't have to like the game. You don't have to buy it, or care. However, end of the day, millions of people enjoy the shit out of it, and so by any sane definition, it is a very good game. There's a reason why a lot of different games get made. People like different things.
Sure, plenty of people feel like you do and love to parade it around.Andrew Vandersteen said:Is it wrong that I couldn't care less about MW3? I know that the game claims to be "The most anticipated game IN HISTORY" (bullshit!)but i really don't care. I kind of hope this game is REALLY bad so we can stop getting these samey-boring modern warefare shooters and start getting shooters like Blood or, hell even Bulletstorm was better.
anyone else feel like this?