It wouldn't be Batman if he didn't stop for pointless theatrics.White_Lama said:The only thing that bothered me was that Batman spent time pouring out some sort of flamable liquid on the ice and up the side of a huge bridge and then did a huge Batman symbol on said bridge.
Instead of, oh I don't know, spending time trying to find the bloody bomb.
Usually if I have to refer to articles in order to explain to people what was wrong with a film, I'll just accept that it was actually okay.Thibaut said:Please check out these two links in order to understand what a critical failure in storytelling TDKR was.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1345836/board/thread/202245927
http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/bum-reviews/35989-bum-reviews-the-dark-knight-rises
I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.Plazmatic said:Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.Senor Smoke21 said:Also definitely this.TheFederation said:what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Can't we just say that it's <link=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool>Rule of Cool?Senor Smoke21 said:I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.Plazmatic said:Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.Senor Smoke21 said:Also definitely this.TheFederation said:what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
Ra's al Ghul is a Master Level Sneak Trainer who maxed out Batman to 100 Sneak with all perks, including Light Foot. Through sheer use, he's maxed out his Light and Heavy Armour skills, so he already has Unhindered and Conditioning, respectively.TheFederation said:what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
But surely the training sessions on the ice in Batman begins would allow him to know how to deal with ice and how to recognize the weak spots.Senor Smoke21 said:I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
if we're going for realism and realistic science, that's not true. The US did experiments to try and make tidal waves with bombs, but even with stupidly powerful bombs they never got a wave that could do any damage to any city.The Plunk said:Even if the bomb didn't irradiate the water, it would surely still create a massive tidal wave?
You actually have a point. A point I hadn't realized. Maybe he was desperate?Durzo_Blint said:...and NOBODY seems to have picked up on this, but Batman kills someone. Not only kills, but shoots them. The driver of the van with the fusion bomb in, Batman straight up fires his battle cannons through the windshield, killing him dead so Miranda/Talia can take the wheel.
Well, a couple of options. He could have slid around on his belly to disperse the pressure on the surface of the ice. He could have some how used "the Bat" to hover over the ice and spray the lighter fluid on the ice. He could have stood on the bridge with a super-soaker full of kerosine - cause, you know, he's Batman.anthony87 said:Can't we just say that it's <link=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool>Rule of Cool?Senor Smoke21 said:I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.Plazmatic said:Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.Senor Smoke21 said:Also definitely this.TheFederation said:what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
So this was a new origin for the Batman Family. Maybe the writers were taking it way back to the original comicsDJ_DEnM said:You actually have a point. A point I hadn't realized. Maybe he was desperate?Durzo_Blint said:...and NOBODY seems to have picked up on this, but Batman kills someone. Not only kills, but shoots them. The driver of the van with the fusion bomb in, Batman straight up fires his battle cannons through the windshield, killing him dead so Miranda/Talia can take the wheel.
This makes me need to re-evalute the movie...
Pretty sure that was an intentional thing. To show progression from when he was having trouble with not falling in when training with Ra's Al Ghul. And the armour is pretty lightweight, I think.TheFederation said:what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
He pancaked a cop car in BB when he was escaping the asylumd the cops were alright. Pretty sure he tactically crushes shit to avoid death.Everyone also seems to forget about the guy he crushed to death in the Dark Knight.
During the chase scene, he rams the tumbler into the truck, completely flattening the cab. You're not walking away from that.
I find it interesting that we've all spent the last 8 years making fun of the fact that nobody can figure out the guy who owns a tank is the resident billionaire who returned from being declared dead just about the time Batman showed up. Then as soon as somebody thinks "Damn, I can totally get why Batman would do that" then sees billionaire who he knows has similar feelings, then makes all the other logical connections, it's suddenly unbelievable."I knew you were that Batman!"
"But how did you know it was me?"
"One day Bruce Wayne came to visit our orphanage, and he looked really sad, because his parents had died."