My biggest problem with The Dark Knight Rises... [spoilers ahead]

Recommended Videos

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
I think Batman just got a little fed up, after all, they don't show him the same courtesy.
So, the only logical thing to do is to KILL EVERYONE WHO GETS IN YOUR WAY.

Besides, they were planning on murdering a few million people...
I think it's fair game.
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
"I knew you were that Batman!"

"But how did you know it was me?"

"One day Bruce Wayne came to visit our orphanage, and he looked really sad, because his parents had died."


Character interaction worthy of George Lucas.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
White_Lama said:
The only thing that bothered me was that Batman spent time pouring out some sort of flamable liquid on the ice and up the side of a huge bridge and then did a huge Batman symbol on said bridge.

Instead of, oh I don't know, spending time trying to find the bloody bomb.
It wouldn't be Batman if he didn't stop for pointless theatrics.
 

Lightning Delight

New member
Apr 21, 2011
351
0
0
I find it kind of funny that some of you guys are focusing on the fact that the bomb would have caused radiation and fallout, and not the fact that you can't fucking turn a fusion reactor into a bomb just by reprogramming it. If you're going to focus on where the plot deviates from reality, that's probably the best place to do it.

But even then, I don't mind. I mean, it's Batman. He glides around in tights punching bad guys into piles of mush. I like the cartoony silliness. Looking for realism in a movie like this sorta ruins it.

OT: Well, Bane did say he'd have to break his one rule....
 

NotALiberal

New member
Jul 10, 2012
108
0
0
BUT GUYS! The flaming Bat inspired people. It wasn't pointless theatrics, it was a battle banner, a rally for everyone to fight, Batman was back in town sorta thing and by god he made sure everyone knew. It certainly did it's job too.

EDIT: Then again, after the ridiculously high expectations people had for this film, I'm not surprised there isn't more fanwank about this sort of inconsequential shit. Also, Batman wasn't intending to kill the guy, he merely wanted to stop the truck, the guy dying was an unintended side effect. It's called Consequentialism people.
 
Feb 22, 2009
715
0
0
Thibaut said:
Please check out these two links in order to understand what a critical failure in storytelling TDKR was.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1345836/board/thread/202245927

http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/bum-reviews/35989-bum-reviews-the-dark-knight-rises
Usually if I have to refer to articles in order to explain to people what was wrong with a film, I'll just accept that it was actually okay.
 

Senor Smoke21

New member
May 23, 2008
288
0
0
Plazmatic said:
Senor Smoke21 said:
TheFederation said:
what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Also definitely this.
Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.
I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
The plot of this movie shouldn't have happened because the nuke wouldn't decay in months, but within hours, maximum, and it wouldn't detonate by itself.

Also why couldn't Bruce just reverse the fraudulent transactions on the stock market? So many witnesses saw it was Bane screwing Wayne Enterprises with that shit.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Senor Smoke21 said:
Plazmatic said:
Senor Smoke21 said:
TheFederation said:
what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Also definitely this.
Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.
I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
Can't we just say that it's <link=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool>Rule of Cool?
 

Dethenger

New member
Jul 27, 2011
775
0
0
TheFederation said:
what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Ra's al Ghul is a Master Level Sneak Trainer who maxed out Batman to 100 Sneak with all perks, including Light Foot. Through sheer use, he's maxed out his Light and Heavy Armour skills, so he already has Unhindered and Conditioning, respectively.

But yeah. I loved the movie while watching it, but after kind of letting it soak in, I just like it. It's no Dark Knight, nor even Batman Begins or Gotham Knight or Under the Red Hood, but it's still pretty good.
 

schtingah

New member
Jun 1, 2011
92
0
0
Senor Smoke21 said:
I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
But surely the training sessions on the ice in Batman begins would allow him to know how to deal with ice and how to recognize the weak spots.
 

Mr. Omega

ANTI-LIFE JUSTIFIES MY HATE!
Jul 1, 2010
3,902
0
0
I enjoyed the film. I never noticed that, but yeah, that does sound bad. But to add to the discussion, I'll just add my biggest issue with the film:

My biggest issue was Bane. Not because he was bad, but because he was just SOOOO close to being even better than the Joker. He was big, he was intimidating, the camera work and music worked flawlessly to make him appear even moreso, and he was intelligent. But two things ruined it. One of which is spoiler-free, but a nitpick, and the other is spoiler-tastic and completey ruined him.

1: Like I said, the physical performance, dialogue and camera/music work made him seem menacing... And then he starts taking. You just can't take him seriously. It takes you out of it. And sometimes you might not understand.

The reveal of Talia. This completely changed the character of Bane. And not in a good way.

Think about it. Why was the Batman and Robin version of Bane so stupid and hated? Simple:
He was just a big, dumb grunt.

Dark Knight Rises was having him a lot closer to his comics version: Big and powerful, but also cunning and intelligent. A diabolical mastermind who could also throw a damn hard punch. And then they reveal Talia. That she was the mastermind. That she found out who Batman was, and that this was all her plan, and that she was the child who managed to escape the inescapable prison. .

So if Talia was the cunning, tortured, vengeful criminal mastermind, what does that make Bane? Simple:
A big, dumb grunt.

Sure, he's not as stupid as he was in B&R, and he certainly had charisma. But he's not a mastermind. He's not able to figure out Batman's identity. He was not able to break Batman mentally, he was just the tool, and the one who breaks him physically. Not only that, but the reveal messed up his origin, which until then, was almost completely right.

And to top it all off, he's taken out rather unceremoniously, right after what was until then a good fight.
 

doggy go 7

New member
Jul 28, 2010
261
0
0
The Plunk said:
Even if the bomb didn't irradiate the water, it would surely still create a massive tidal wave?
if we're going for realism and realistic science, that's not true. The US did experiments to try and make tidal waves with bombs, but even with stupidly powerful bombs they never got a wave that could do any damage to any city.

Now in movies that would be the case, because awesome, but in reality, it is nowhere near powerful enough (especially as it's in the air rather than ontop of/in the water).
 

DJ_DEnM

My brother answers too!
Dec 22, 2010
1,869
0
0
Durzo_Blint said:
...and NOBODY seems to have picked up on this, but Batman kills someone. Not only kills, but shoots them. The driver of the van with the fusion bomb in, Batman straight up fires his battle cannons through the windshield, killing him dead so Miranda/Talia can take the wheel.
You actually have a point. A point I hadn't realized. Maybe he was desperate?

This makes me need to re-evalute the movie...
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
anthony87 said:
Senor Smoke21 said:
Plazmatic said:
Senor Smoke21 said:
TheFederation said:
what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Also definitely this.
Actually I dont see the plot hole in this. First off, Batman is not supposed to have 'Heavy' armor, its light weight yet durable, so he can, you know, GLIDE, and FIGHT, and well, MOVE. Second, batman didn't light the ice on fire (seriously? you asked this?) he lit a fuse, which traveled OVER the ice.
I have no problem with the fire bit but you can't ignore that he would definitely be heavier than the average person and earlier in the film we saw an average person fall though the ice.
While yes, his armour is 'light', it would still have some weight to it, plus he's a muscular dude, gonna be packing some pounds himself. And the way he just nonchalantly strolls around like the ice ain't no thang. Not so much a plot hole as a continuity problem.
Can't we just say that it's <link=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool>Rule of Cool?
Well, a couple of options. He could have slid around on his belly to disperse the pressure on the surface of the ice. He could have some how used "the Bat" to hover over the ice and spray the lighter fluid on the ice. He could have stood on the bridge with a super-soaker full of kerosine - cause, you know, he's Batman.

DJ_DEnM said:
Durzo_Blint said:
...and NOBODY seems to have picked up on this, but Batman kills someone. Not only kills, but shoots them. The driver of the van with the fusion bomb in, Batman straight up fires his battle cannons through the windshield, killing him dead so Miranda/Talia can take the wheel.
You actually have a point. A point I hadn't realized. Maybe he was desperate?

This makes me need to re-evalute the movie...
So this was a new origin for the Batman Family. Maybe the writers were taking it way back to the original comics ;) Batman, as originally conceived and written in the Detective Comics used guns and regularly killed people. I can't remember if it was MovieBob or the Podcast crew, but they brought up one example where Batman used his whole "I am going to drop you off a high roof" torture routine on a bank robber... just minus the rope...

The I shall not kill was a product of the Golden Age overhaul wherein the comic book publishers were trying to maintain their business in the face of ongoing "studies" and cultural beliefs that comic books caused: violence in children, homosexuality in children, and the rise in juvenile crime rates leading into the '50s.... Factors they did not include were, I dunno, the massive child boom that took place in the mid- to late-40's.... More juveniles might lead to more juvenile crime, but I haven't done any research into this :p

This type of character narrative of "I SHALL NEVER TAKE A LIFE!!!" became the norm in the Silver Age of Comics which was triggered by the creation of the Comics Code Authority. Other examples include: Green Arrow, Wonder Woman overhaul, Green Latern overhaul, etc.
 

Psykoma

New member
Nov 29, 2010
481
0
0
My biggest problem with DKR was that the second half was boring enough for me to fall alseep.
 

Sexy Devil

New member
Jul 12, 2010
701
0
0
Eh, he killed Harvey Dent and it was pretty emblematic of his descent into villainy in the eyes of the public. Maybe he still thought of himself as a villain and modified the "no killing" rule to "if there's no other option then kill away". Alternatively he might've figured there were kinda bigger fish to fry with the whole nuke thing even if it is against his code of ethics.

As for the nuke thing, just roll with it. I'll be the first to admit that in shoving ludicrous amounts of symbolism into the movie Nolan lost a lot of the realism. I mean it is still without a doubt my favourite movie but Nolan's love of James Bond was certainly showing.

TheFederation said:
what i want to know is how batman could walk on the ice with all his heavy armour, and set the ice on fire, and have time to plan and burn his symbol on the bridge when anyone other 'normal' people almost immediately fell in.
Pretty sure that was an intentional thing. To show progression from when he was having trouble with not falling in when training with Ra's Al Ghul. And the armour is pretty lightweight, I think.

Everyone also seems to forget about the guy he crushed to death in the Dark Knight.
During the chase scene, he rams the tumbler into the truck, completely flattening the cab. You're not walking away from that.
He pancaked a cop car in BB when he was escaping the asylumd the cops were alright. Pretty sure he tactically crushes shit to avoid death.

"I knew you were that Batman!"

"But how did you know it was me?"

"One day Bruce Wayne came to visit our orphanage, and he looked really sad, because his parents had died."
I find it interesting that we've all spent the last 8 years making fun of the fact that nobody can figure out the guy who owns a tank is the resident billionaire who returned from being declared dead just about the time Batman showed up. Then as soon as somebody thinks "Damn, I can totally get why Batman would do that" then sees billionaire who he knows has similar feelings, then makes all the other logical connections, it's suddenly unbelievable.