Nannies Get Angry Over Dante's Inferno Achievement

Recommended Videos

Enzeru92

New member
Oct 18, 2008
598
0
0
First and foremost THERE'S A INTERNATIONAL NANNY ASSOCIATION
i doubt its going to be real baby come on think people they'll probably just small evil demons that u squash with ur feet
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,408
0
0
someone will always take offence to anything that's another thinks is funny.

Oh well, I thought it was pretty clever
 

teutonicman

New member
Mar 30, 2009
2,565
0
0
1) Mabey the INA should be more pissed off that the catholic church say dead babies go to hell.
2)What evidence is the INA basing their judgement that the killing of babies in the game will increase infant violence?
 

Ph0t0n1c Ph34r

New member
Feb 25, 2009
391
0
0
darksusano said:
Cid SilverWing said:
Baby murder is wrong any way you slice it (no pun intended). And why unbaptized babies, specifically?
Baptized babies go to heaven, unbaptized, even if they were going to be, don't. I think they go to, or at least used to go to, Limbo. Along with the people who had no chance to learn about God or the Bible.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Pretty much. I don't recall ready about Dante talking to devil-babies in the Inferno, but the hell with it (no pun intended).
 

MrSnugglesworth

Into the Wild Green Snuggle
Jan 15, 2009
3,232
0
0
On the Facebook page, they are yelling about how its bad and some guy was like "That games gonna be awesome."
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Malygris said:
"All that being said, it should be understood that our job is not to censor potentially tasteless or objectionable content nor dictate to publishers what type of content they may include in their games," the ESRB statement said.
It's not their primary thing, but they do it indirectly. The A rating is essentially death to sales: which equates it to censorship.

Too much realistic violence/smex? BAM: A rating, and the game disappears. I'll tell you what: Rockstar didn't rework San Andreas because they cared whether the game had sex in it: they reworked it because otherwise the only area they would be able to sell it would have been their website.
 

ucciolord1

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,138
0
0
Are you sure you're not making this up?
lol... killing babies.
As if we needed another reason to play this game.

...OK so killing babies is wrong. That's true enough, but these babies, from what I gather, are giant evil ones. Doesn't that make it easier to swallow?
Also they're digital babies, not real ones, and that issue has been worn out to the point of snapping.
 

ryai458

New member
Oct 20, 2008
1,494
0
0
when i read this title i laughed when i finished reading the article i laughed again
 

CaptLark

New member
Jun 15, 2007
3
0
0
SilverHammerMan said:
"INA feels this video game component of Dante's Inferno was created out of poor taste and bad judgment. INA is opposed to video games that promote and encourage players to 'kill' babies, even in fantasy play,"
Wait, there's a non-video game component to the video game? Poor choice of words, it makes them sound stupid...
There are currently four movies entitled Dante's Inferno, one of which is only two years old, as well as being the first part of Dante's original 14th century work Divine Comedy, so, yes, there are at least five recognised non-video components of Dante's Inferno.
Their choice of wording is apparently to distinguish the video game component - about which they are complaining - from these previous works of the same name.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Kuchinawa212 said:
someone will always take offence to anything that's another thinks is funny.

Oh well, I thought it was pretty clever
Explain to me how killing babies is funny or clever.
 

siege_1302

New member
Jul 17, 2008
213
0
0
Whatever happened to individual responsibility? If you're worried about your kids playing the game, don't buy it for them and confiscate it if you catch them playing it.

Remember, some things are aimed at adults only. You don't have nannies against porn getting this kind of attention, do you?
 

SilverHammerMan

New member
Jul 26, 2009
448
0
0
CaptLark said:
SilverHammerMan said:
"INA feels this video game component of Dante's Inferno was created out of poor taste and bad judgment. INA is opposed to video games that promote and encourage players to 'kill' babies, even in fantasy play,"
Wait, there's a non-video game component to the video game? Poor choice of words, it makes them sound stupid...
There are currently four movies entitled Dante's Inferno, one of which is only two years old, as well as being the first part of Dante's original 14th century work Divine Comedy, so, yes, there are at least five recognised non-video components of Dante's Inferno.
Their choice of wording is apparently to distinguish the video game component - about which they are complaining - from these previous works of the same name.
Ah, still, they could have just said the video game version, but whatever. Thanks for setting me straight.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
Armored Prayer said:
Shouldn't those nannies be taking care of kids instead of complaining about a feature in a game.
I dont get it either. Nannies should do their job and keep kids far away from this game instead of bring as much attention to it as possible like they are doing. Seriously, if you have a problem with something, boycott. To effectively boycott, don't advertise it.