Negative turning point for your favorite video game.

[zombiestrangler]

Borderlands: It (severely) lacks depth as far as the story goes sans DLC.

Fallout New Vegas: I have to stop and restart the game every few hours so it doesn't crash in the middle of something important and the loading screens don't take 5 minutes.

 

[Kortney]

Fallout 3: New Vegas: "The game is a non-starter. Seriously, it keeps glitching dead after the first mission."-A friend of mine.

Fallout: New Vegas, not Fallout 3: New Vegas.

Please, it's an expansion pack and we all know it.
As McBane once said:"That's the joke".

Expansion pack? I've put 80 hours into it. That has to be the best damn expansion pack ever released. I've also never heard of an expansion pack being developed by a different company of people.

Having the same engine as your predecessor ≠ expansion pack.

New Vegas is completely stand alone.

I got the feeling that they only included them in Oblivion to appease the fans, and didn't take the time to actually integrate them well. They should have been cut entirely, but I'll bet he was afraid of the backlash since they'd already said they'd be in the game.

Very true. The fact that horses didn't even have reins but there was animation to suggest they did brings that theory home.

 

[Sexy Street]

The gate closing quest in Oblivion where you have to close all the gates outside of all the cities. Fucking annoying.