Short answer: if they did that, they would sell only half the copies they will sell this way. It's EA, remember.chromewarriorXIII said:I understand why they are making the movie two parts, but why would you bother doing that with the game. Instead of making the game based off the movie, base it off the book and that way, instead of two 5-6 hour length games, you have one 10-12 hour length game. If you take into account the collection and exploring you can usually do in the Harry Potter games (at least the first couple) than that would make a solid 15 hour game.
Sweet mother of... I agree! That game MUST be made! But will it be like the normal Rainbow Six series (y'know... WITH GUNS?) just placed in Hogwarts, or will it be the gameplay of Rainbow Six with wands and stuff? If the latter would be correct, I want shotgun-like wands! xDkannibus said:Rainbow Six: Hogwarts.
Someone back me up, that game needs to be made.
No no your not. This is probably the only book of the series that would make an AWESOME game anyway since this is when the War comes to a head and the battle is awesome. (The last like 10 Chapters of the book) And its the one where the fateful Line by Mrs. Weasley is spoken "Not my daughter you *****!"hazabaza1 said:Am I a bad person for thinking that this seems like it could be good?
This trailer might actually inspire me to look into a Harry Potter game again. I only have this one at the moment:Pandalisk said:Well they danm well are taking liberties, but this might be interesting
It was released as the Sorcerer's Stone in America. [small] just thought I'd point that out too[/small]Redlin5 said:Ah, what an interesting childhood I had. Too bad EA games had to totally screw up the name of the title though. It's Philosophers stone, not Sorcerers! Geeez!
[small] I don't actually care, I just thought I'd point it out. [/small]