Nazulu said:
If you can't handle other opinions then you probably should spend your time somewhere else ... Think about it, what does ranting about how everyone is wrong on the internet going to do?
I wasn't really taking it THAT seriously... I just tend to sum up my feelings in one master post and then wait to have conversations with those who disagree. I wasn't exactly being abrasive (except maybe to the developers). I
could go into the problems I have with people just eating up the new games and in turn, perpetuating the staleness of the series, but some of them have legitimate arguements...
Buretsu said:
Gen 1 ... had the worst game mechanics. Wrap and Fire Spin were absolutely broken. Can't attack, can't switch, and take damage every round? Fun! Amnesia, too, with the single Special stat. Also, Critical chance based on Speed (Persian w/ Slash was a monster). Psychic types could only be hit SE with 3 moves, none of which had more than 75 power, and that was only if Pin Missile hit the maximum of 5 times. There's a gif that outlines how horrible the Gen 1 mechanics were. I'll have to look for it.
It also had the laziest Pokemon designs. Yes, you can talk about how you dislike the complexity, but they have to be complex because Gen 1 already all the generic birds and bugs and zoo animals you could hope for.
EVERY DAMN THING got better. Yes, Red and Green were revolutionary. But all the later games were EVOLUTIONARY. Pokemon has done nothing but improve since the first game.
You're right about improvements to the mechanics, no doubt. It made some Pokemon exceptionally better than others, and there was absolutely a best pokemon and move set for EVERY situation.
Now, this is just a matter of opinion, but I kind of like it like that.
I'm the type of person who LOVES
Super Smash Bros. for 64 and can't really get into any of the others. At this point, I know
every single move for
every single character, and there is not a single situation in which I wouldn't know the best course of action. Sure some of the characters were utter shit (Mario is essentially useless after Luigi is unlocked), and some were clearly the best (Kirby or Pikachu usually take the cake in this department), but that somehow makes the game more fun in my opinion.
What I don't think is a matter of opinion is (as you put it) how "revolutionary" SSB64 was vs. it's "evolutionary" counterparts.
This is where I see the problem with the newer games.
I don't care if the mechanics are 100% perfect creature-based RPG mechanics.
I don't care if the moves were broken in Gen 1.
I don't care if the new Pokemon are the most brilliantly designed fictional creatures since Cthulu... or like... the sandworms from
Dune... goddamn they were cool... especially in that game
Emperor: Battle for Dune where they'd eat all your troops and shit... god that game sucked though.
But yeah... I don't care about that stuff because you were wrong about
one thing. "EVERY DAMN THING" did
not get better. Pokemon is lacking more and more in the originality department with each and every installment and it's getting really bad. The formula works for now, but it will run the series into the ground. This game suffers from the worst case of Nintendo-itis I've ever seen.
Pokemon needs a revamping to the degree of what happened to Mario for Super Mario 64...
Maybe even bigger.
Luca72 said:
I still think there's a lot of promise in Pokemon to do something new and exciting, since it's essentially a multiplayer RPG with theoretically near limitless combinations. But I really don't give a shit about saving whatever island the new game takes place on, I don't care about Team "Not Rocket" or the Elite Four, and I especially don't care about whatever the new dress-up game is.
This is EXACTLY what I'm saying.
Smeggs said:
You know what is iconic and memorable?
Kyogre and Groudon nearly destroying the world.
Giratina erupting from the dark world and flying at the screen in almost screamer-like fashion.
Zekrom appearing before your character to test your might before your final battle.
...all gimmicks that have no lasting impact.
Find me a pokemon player who doesn't know who Mewtwo is and in the meantime I'll find you 100 who haven't heard of any of these new deus pokemon that are supposed to be important but really aren't.
And you would call any of these iconic? Please... Pikachu is hands down the most iconic Pokemon, and he didn't do anything nearly as cool as the shit these newer Pokemon did.
Again, it's all a problem with the new games being unambitious formula tweaks.
(And btw, just a heads up, I've played every generation through the Elite Four or their respective ending counterparts, and I thought the whole Giratina scenario was stupid overdramatic garbage compared to learning about Mewtwo in the burned down lab on Cinnabar. Zekrom was kind of cool, but not too memorable.)
Dryk said:
Someone just reminded me. Ugggghh, the increasing proportion of legendaries has been more than annoying for over two generations now.
TomLikesGuitar said:
... RANDOM APPLIANCE-MON (or is there already a TV one...)
It's been done, it was pretty cool. They suffered from Sugimori's increasing fascination with derpy faces though.
img Pictures of appliances with faces /img
This saddens me

.