Sonicron said:I'm not really a fan of Christmas in it's present form.
How does believing in Santa Clause affect the child negatively? It doesn't harm the child, it doesn't make them go out and beat up another kid, so therefore is IS a white lie.ike42 said:It isn't a white lie because it takes advantage of the inherent gullibility of children. While I won't stop you and I don't think it's anyone's place to stop you, you can't fault someone for not wanting to be included in your lie. Children don't have the ability to distinguish between which lies are ok and which are bad so when dealing with children they should always be approached with truth, or avoidance if you're uncomfortable with the truth; not outright lies.kortin said:The problem is the teacher deciding when the children should stop believing in Santa. The teacher had no place in deciding that.
First of all: Not all lies are bad. Yes, your parents told you when you were young that lying in general is bad. HARMFUL lies, like when you lie for your own personal gain is bad. If it doesn't harm anything or anyone, then its not a harmful lie. Its a white lie. White lies don't typically cause harm. They're things like Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny.
I find it sad that I, a 17 year old teenager, understand the difference between a white lie and harmful lies better than most of the apparent adults here.
Oh man thats a great mental image...wrongheaded said:It's like blowing pot in your dog's face - something you do for your own enjoyment, not his.
He would give wooden toys to boys and girls. Every one in town liked him. I thought he was creepy...xdiesp said:St. Nicholas was very real.
Don't worry, I saw your comment. There were a few others, too. But I'd say a large number of comments have been rather mean spirited. There have been a few like Devil_Worshipper (hey, that's funny) and kortin that seem to agree as well.PanYue said:Hey cmon Saltyk I'm on your side too! XD
This guy, too.StBishop said:Not quite.Saltyk said:Personally, I'm surprised that you and I are about the only people commenting in this thread with such an opinion. Most of these comments seem to amount to the following.ike42 said:This was effectively what I was saying that I do. At Thanksgiving my brother's in-laws all hold hands and pray, I just walk into the living room and wait it out. I don't bring it up and avoid the questions if the kids ask.Saltyk said:I'd say that the teacher should have deflected the question and told the kids to talk to their parents about that. Explain that there are some things their parents are better equipped to teach them. This avoids all issues.
"8 year olds still believe in Santa Claus? What children."
"I never believed in Santa. Be amazed at how cynical I am. Praise me!"
"Parents shouldn't lie to their children."
Way to go guys. We can't even let children imagine that there is a fat man in a red suit that travels all over the world and gives gifts to all the good boys and girls out there on one day a year. Because obviously that is bad and leads to communism or liberal thoughts.
I was one of the many kids who became suspicious. I wanted the truth, and I think my parents did the wrong thing by lying to me. I also think that in the large scheme of things, it doesn't fucking matter because in all other ways they were good parents.
But there is no reason to get angry at a teacher for telling the kids the truth. Sure she probably shouldn't have said anything, but really if a kid asks a direct question (which I gather wasn't the case in this scenario) they should be told the truth. They don't need all the details, but they shouldn't get an outright lie.
I agree that she should have just left it or deflected the topic, I like the idea of dodging the subject and leaving it to the parents, but I also don't think this is an atrocity.
Just quickly on those three points:
- I'm not surprised that 8 year olds believe still, I'd be surprised if they were shocked or upset at the realisation.
- I don't think it's cynicism, more scepticism. I don't thing it's that unlikely that almost everyone (who doesn't have older siblings) figures it out at around the age of 7 or 8.
- They shouldn't; but we also shouldn't be outraged by Santa, there's more pressing issues in the world.
I thought it was about avarice and gluttony.naam said:Oh God, santa clause isn't real?!
But that's what christmas is all about!
In my experience, it still remained mostly the same. My father had been up since 5 or 6 making a huge dinner. Family gathers together Christmas morning and opens gifts. We cleaned up the mess we made, and I played with my new toys or games or whatever. Slowly other family members showed up. Aunts, uncles, cousins, and grandparents, most of them bring some assortment of gifts and food. We talked, ate, exchanged gifts and played. Everyone went home. The end.lacktheknack said:"Ruined"
Pffffffffft.
This is completely mystifying to me. I didn't even know what Santa Claus was until my first December in kindergarten, when shiny eyed kids told me all about him. And when I asked my Mom about it, she said "He's not real".
How is this a "Christmas Ruiner"? Bloody hell, if you're basing your ENTIRE CHRISTMAS EXPERIENCE on Santa, what happens the year you REALLY find out that he doesn't exist?
Obviously it's both. That's why Santa was fat.VanTesla said:I thought it was about avarice and gluttony.naam said:Oh God, santa clause isn't real?!
But that's what christmas is all about!
Also fully agree with this.Jonluw said:Jesus Christ, they're eight years old.
It was only appropriate that they got to know if their parents hadn't managed to tell them already.
I sorta wish the teacher would have told them to question the existence of God while he was at it. Teach them some critical thought, because if they believe in Santa at eight, the birds know they need it.
yeah uh....no one really cares dude, the reason the holiday still exist is because we celebrate the birth of jesus, may not be the right time of year, but we dont care. we never cared.ike42 said:Not true, Christmas is a holiday that was actually taken from the Pagans. While biblical "scholars" tend to make the argument that Jesus was born in the spring, the holiday was put in December to coincide with the Pagan celebration of the Winter Solstice. So really, without Jesus there would be a Christmas, it would just be called something different...probably.13thforswarn said:So let me get this straight. A teacher "ruined" Christmas for some eight year olds that a fat man in a red suit who travels around the world in a sleigh and leaves presents for kids is actually ficticious? That's ridiculous. The kids are going to get presents anyway, they're gonna spend Xmas with their family and friends and have a jolly old time regardless of whether they know Santa exists or not. How about someone teach them about Jesus, which is the reason there even is an Xmas.