Nah, don't have the cash. Still recouping from paying ~$400 total for the xbox.sv93 said:Same for me except I got a PS3. "Join us on the dark side!"gmer412 said:I agree. This lack of games is what motivated me to buy a 360.
Nah, don't have the cash. Still recouping from paying ~$400 total for the xbox.sv93 said:Same for me except I got a PS3. "Join us on the dark side!"gmer412 said:I agree. This lack of games is what motivated me to buy a 360.
eventually it will break or something... like my 3 others...gmer412 said:Nah, don't have the cash. Still recouping from paying ~$400 total for the xbox.sv93 said:Same for me except I got a PS3. "Join us on the dark side!"gmer412 said:I agree. This lack of games is what motivated me to buy a 360.
What?Irridium said:It seems that the only hardcore games for 2009 are The Conduit and Madworld.
really? I never heard about those games, except the Wii sports resort but I already have Wii sports and Wii play and I don't feel like spending $50 on another Wii sports game.Jonatron said:What?Irridium said:It seems that the only hardcore games for 2009 are The Conduit and Madworld.
As previously discussed (although you might not be following it), No More Heroes 2, Punch-out, Sin and Punishment 2 and the upcomming 'Wii sports resort' (might have something in there with the sparring, if they make it deeper than Wii Sports, although there's no chance of online...)
And there's the ton of 'Let's play with Wii' gamecube ports comming out, which may be pleasurable for many. (£6 V £30 for the sake of using a Wii Mote? No Thanks!)
I could think of a winning idea for a game that involes both of these aspects.. well with a little alteration of the concept of "fitness"...Consistence said:Dear Nintendo, You have expanded your consumer base now, Fix your online system, release more games that do not include 1. fitness (I'll go outside) 2. Hannah Montana
Yes, god forbid we get our fat asses out of the couch while we stare into the low watt lightbulb for a few hours on end... or even better, our obese children subsisting on ho-hos, quik and funyuns.pimppeter2 said:The Wii seems nice but its fatal flaw (to me) is that gaming is used with a contoler on a tv, while you sit down on a couch. That is why I didn;t buy it, and I dont play on the computer(this is not flame, just the reason to me.)
I was talking about ethics and its relation to economics.Eggo said:It's important when you're attempting to talk about economicstheultimateend said:Oh yes, talk about a required course. Lord knows its more important than all other courses in school.Eggo said:Looks like someone here didn't take Econ 101.theultimateend said:Making money is not a bad business strategy. (Because if you aren't making money you won't survive).
Being in the business of making money is.
"It doesn't matter what happens to other people. You are here to make money...period."![]()
All this pillow talk is getting me excited.Optimystic said:Yes, god forbid we get our fat asses out of the couch while we stare into the low watt lightbulb for a few hours on end... or even better, our obese children subsisting on ho-hos, quik and funyuns.pimppeter2 said:The Wii seems nice but its fatal flaw (to me) is that gaming is used with a contoler on a tv, while you sit down on a couch. That is why I didn;t buy it, and I dont play on the computer(this is not flame, just the reason to me.)
How is Nintendo's actions and target audience any more unsustainable than Microsoft or Sony's target audience, if anything it's more sustainable.Indigo_Dingo said:While not acting in a manner that breaks any current ideal of ethical behaviour, they are acting in a manner that renders gaming majorly unsustainable in a long term manner. In the same way that taking natural resources now, instead of conserving said for future generations is not technically unethical.
In the sort term yeah but these are casual gamers where talking about study's have shown that they tend to buy maybe 5 games in a given year (or something along those lines) plus there not as devoted to games and that's not going to cut it in the long term. Whereas hardcore gamers are extremely devoted to games buy dozens of games in a single year on a constant basis thus sustaining the industry in the long term. Always remember their CASUAL gamers they might play games every now and then or during a party but for the most part it's not a big part of their life like it is for hardcore gamers so there not going to want to fork out tons of money for games there barely ever going to play.Axolotl said:How is Nintendo's actions and target audience any more unsustainable than Microsoft or Sony's target audience, if anything it's more sustainable.Indigo_Dingo said:While not acting in a manner that breaks any current ideal of ethical behaviour, they are acting in a manner that renders gaming majorly unsustainable in a long term manner. In the same way that taking natural resources now, instead of conserving said for future generations is not technically unethical.
3rd party games is what the Wii needs. But it doesn't absolve Nintendo of shifting away from the demographic that kept the company afloat through the Gamecube era.blindey said:[Kyle voice] Really? REAALLY? [/Kyle voice]Consistence said:2009's new releases do not give me any hope, on this drought of "hardcore" games situation.
You can't honestly tell me that none of the 2009 games interest you?
A few I'm looking forward to that aren't staples of a previous series (aka sequels with an increasingly high number)
Muramasa: The Demon Blade
The Conduit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5EhfHNPA8g
I'll give Deadly Creatures a try
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeaYSctVb50
Same with Little King's Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb955wrFJp4
Punch-out? Hell yeah!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-GoPk3hpTo
Then there's the slew of stable additions to series
Fatal Frame IV, Monster Hunter, Tenchu, Houst of the Dead