No Backwards Compatibility - One of the many signs of industry greed?

Recommended Videos

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Because backwards compatibility doesn't work that way.

Manaman covered it pretty well.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
OutrageousEmu said:
ACman said:
This is the real reason that the PC is the home of the Gaming Master Race.
How did Vista do with DOS again?
They saw a lovely freeware program called "DOSBox" and said "Well, that's that settled."
 

Loonyyy

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,292
0
0
No Backwards compatability: A sign of games moving onwards.
If everything was backwards compatible, Gamecube and Wii would require cartridge slots, PC's would require Floppy and belt code support. Being backwards compatible is not necessarily easy, and is not necessarily simple. And to dress it up as greed just smacks of ignorance. If you've made a new platform, you make stuff for it. If people want to play the old stuff: Use the Old Platform. You aren't entitled to anything. If they want to make and sell things you aren't happy with, vote with your wallet. If you don't like endless remakes and resellings, congratulations. Neither do I. But you don't have to buy them either.
At the end of the day, if you don't like something, you don't have to buy it. And being greedy isn't a bad thing for a corporation: They exist to make money. They do so by making products that people will buy. That's capitalism. In a free market, where demand exists, a supply will soon follow. People want these games and are willing to pay for them. If you don't, you don't have to buy them. It's really a simple problem.
 

Loonyyy

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,292
0
0
OutrageousEmu said:
Then don't buy the rereleases, buy the damn new games. What sort of person actually gets offended when a rerelease that clearly isn't targetted at you comes out?
You sir, are a legend. Why is it that people like the OP can't realise that no-one is forcing them to buy games that they don't like or want, or already own?
 

Skoosh

New member
Jun 19, 2009
178
0
0
I know right? I'm so angry my CD player doesn't play cassettes, they are just being greedy!

It's not like they are going out of their way to keep backwards compatibility from you. The software is completely different between some generations, particularly with this one. It's difficult getting it to work for every game. When it's simple, they put it in, which is why your PS3 can play PS1 games, despite them selling remakes and such for the PSP. It's just not as simple making it play PS2 games.

What does it matter though? If you've got PS2 games, you more than likely already have a PS2, so just play the game on that. I plug my PS2 in when it's needed the same way I hook up the N64 when I want to play Star Fox instead of bitching that the Wii can't run it. I suppose some people bought a PS3 but not a PS2, but then why would you have PS2 games instead of just buying the remake online? Still doesn't make sense.
 

HeatproofShAdOw

New member
Apr 12, 2011
139
0
0
._. My 360 has backwards compatibility with some games...

Anyway, as other uses have pointed out, business's exist solely to make a profit. That's all Microsoft cares about, that's all Sony cares about and that's all Nintendo cares about. Take this what you will, but they don't really give two shits about your backwards compatibility problem when you've bought the console. Why would they want you playing old games, not giving them much of a profit when they could remove the functionality, forcing you to buy it on the marketplace/store and give them a bigger return.

Just my two cents.
 

Plinglebob

Team Stupid-Face
Nov 11, 2008
1,815
0
0
Damn companies for not making their items backwards compatible. How am I supposed to play my records when they refuse to fit into my CD player, and my mp3 player as nowhere I can shove a cassette in. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!!
 

Shadowsole

New member
May 17, 2009
173
0
0
the only time this has ever really bothered me was with dynasty warriors 5. I loved that game, It was the game in the xbox when it finally died...
of course i put it in the 360 but it didn't work. I've since bought 6 but its still not the same. I wish it was backwards compatiple but you cant have everything
 

Aeonknight

New member
Apr 8, 2011
751
0
0
I specifically snatched up a backwards compatible PS3 because my PS2 has definately seen better days. Xbox 360? I miss the ability to import my own music into games more than I want backwards compatibility.
 

Shadowsole

New member
May 17, 2009
173
0
0
Skoosh said:
What does it matter though? If you've got PS2 games, you more than likely already have a PS2, so just play the game on that. I plug my PS2 in when it's needed the same way I hook up the N64 when I want to play Star Fox instead of bitching that the Wii can't run it. I suppose some people bought a PS3 but not a PS2, but then why would you have PS2 games instead of just buying the remake online? Still doesn't make sense.
Consoles Break, Not everybody is too lazy to plug in a old console
 

ACman

New member
Apr 21, 2011
629
0
0
OutrageousEmu said:
ACman said:
This is the real reason that the PC is the home of the Gaming Master Race.
How did Vista do with DOS again?
Dunno. Never used Vista. My DosBox emulator works fine in Win7 though.

There is the occasional Win95 game that you have to do a bit of fiddling to get working but there's nothing to stop you from doing that.

I can play games from 25 years ago on my PC.

Don't get me wrong; I love consolesbut there are games that are locked in time that I can't go back to because the systems are dead. Goldeneye64,.. or Bushido Blade,.. or Power Stone! (Anyone remember Power Stone for Dreamcast?)
 

Clive Howlitzer

New member
Jan 27, 2011
2,783
0
0
Weird, I haven't noticed this backwards compatibility issue. Oh wait, I use a PC! Silly me! Seriously though, it does indeed suck. I wonder if its because all they do nowadays is remake old titles and if it was backwards compatible, you could just play the old versions instead!
 

A Free Man

New member
May 9, 2010
322
0
0
Racecarlock said:
No seriously, who else has noticed this crap? It's easy to spot. My 360 can't play most of the original xbox games excluding of course ones co-produced by microsoft. I heard sony isn't putting backwards compatibility into any of the new ps3s, but both companies ARE selling games from those systems as digital content so you'll have to buy them again. What a load of shit. It's extortion. Or at the very least they're intentionally gouging you. Why the fuck do we put up with this? Why are we letting them make it so we can't play our old games until we buy them again from some digital store? We need to send them a message. Backwards compatibility or no money for you!

And being a business does not excuse them from this shit. For fucks sake, at this point, the mafia is technically a business since they also do whatever they can to make money.
I totally agree, it is the main reason I was so disapointed with the PS3 when I got it. Such an unnecessary money grab.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
Racecarlock said:
OrokuSaki said:
Or, if you're like me, you can buy the old PS3 that has backwards compatibility, put a bigger hard drive in it, and pray that it doesn't break down.
Wait, they HAD backwards compatibility and they took it OUT?! That's even worse! Now I'm convinced it IS extortion. Also, I only have a 360. Was cheaper at the time.
They took it out because it was the least vital thing they could remove to bring prices down.

Why did they want to bring prices down? Because people bitched about the prices.

Edit: You do realize that Sony sells PS3s at a loss, right? They sell them for LESS than it costs to make them.
Actually I am fairly sure I remember a news post a year(maybe a lot more) or so ago on here that said they starting making money off PS3s. I do mean the hardware here.
 

Spoon E11

New member
Oct 27, 2010
310
0
0
ACman said:
This is the real reason that the PC is the home of the Gaming Master Race.

Except the games that I want to play came with 16 bit installers and now that I have a 64-bit OS it's impossible to play them.
 

dagens24

New member
Mar 20, 2004
879
0
0
Racecarlock said:
No seriously, who else has noticed this crap? It's easy to spot. My 360 can't play most of the original xbox games excluding of course ones co-produced by microsoft. I heard sony isn't putting backwards compatibility into any of the new ps3s, but both companies ARE selling games from those systems as digital content so you'll have to buy them again. What a load of shit. It's extortion. Or at the very least they're intentionally gouging you. Why the fuck do we put up with this? Why are we letting them make it so we can't play our old games until we buy them again from some digital store? We need to send them a message. Backwards compatibility or no money for you!

And being a business does not excuse them from this shit. For fucks sake, at this point, the mafia is technically a business since they also do whatever they can to make money.
Microsoft and Sony don't owe you backwards compatability. If you don't want to re-buy the games then go dig up your PS2/Xbox.
 

Ruwrak

New member
Sep 15, 2009
845
0
0
teebeeohh said:
you know what's great?
my PC runs the original Doom.
*flameshield up*
*loads flamethrower*

And I think you're actually right.
Dispite the not so serious note, you do make a good point.
At least the PC has no issues with backwards compatability (unless you want to play Dungeon Keeper II on your Windows 7... But even that can be rerouted with a little nudging.)

What we can say about it is: "Should have kept your old consoles."

Spoon E11 said:
ACman said:
This is the real reason that the PC is the home of the Gaming Master Race.

Except the games that I want to play came with 16 bit installers and now that I have a 64-bit OS it's impossible to play them.
I'm fairly sure there are ways to play those things still. Probably something with 'Run in compatability mode' in the games properties. Like Dungeon Keeper II for example.
Sure you have to knock around some things but it works in the end. It just takes alot of effort ;)
 

Stocky37

New member
Nov 15, 2009
35
0
0
fenrizz said:
Sure, the Japanese PS3's would be cheaper without backwards compatibility since it had a PS2 hardware.
But the European and American versions of the PS3 had backwards compatibility via software.

I can't imagine that they saved a whole lot of money from removing that.

I think they did it so they could sell us old PSX titles via the Playstation Store.
Actually the later versions took out the Emotion Engine (which until that point had been used for the PS2 emulation) but left in the "Graphics Synthesizer" GPU, which is what made the backwards compatibility possible (i.e. no it was not purely software based). Just having the graphics synthesiser reduced the amount of compatibility the system had in the first place. It's also what they took out when they wanted to reduce the size and costs of the PS3 by removing BC.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Not so much greed as Laziness and Forced Obsolescence.

This was being taught in most business classes during the Yuppie era. (late 80s)