Susano said:
ghstman said:
Wow, thank you. That was a very good explanation.
Anyway, If I haven't made clear, I don't think Andrew Ryan's state could ever work the way he intended it to, and if it did, I probably wouldn't like it.
Glad to help!
No, I don't think Ryan's form of government would work either. By it's very nature it is paradoxical, which is kind of pointed out in one of the audio diaries in Bioshock 2 where Lamb and Ryan are debating. Ryan says something to the effect that no one has to buy into anyone else's belief system if they live in rapture. Lamb points out that they actually do: Ryan's philosophy. In order to be free from everyone else's influence, you have to buy into someone else's.
Also, you can never truly escape those influences that Ryan talks about in the real world. Take for example American law makers. Our constitution says in no uncertain language that congress shall make no law favoring one religion over the other. Church, however, is often the predominate source of what forms a lawmakers opinion. You see this come up a lot in conservative opinion, ie: the sanctity of marriage standpoint, sacredness of all life in regards to abortion, etc... You get the idea. Are they passing a law that directly favors one religion over another? No. They're trying to pass a law that prevents women from having an abortion. Are they fighting for that particular legislature because their viewpoint is influenced by their religious beliefs? Absolutely. For the record, I'm not trying to create a debate over politics, separation of church and state, or any of that. I'm just using it as an example.
I forget where this was supposed to be going, but in short, it could never work, because we can never really separate ourselves from those influences that we've already been exposed to and raised to believe in.