Nooooo! It's a dark day for Call of Duty fans.
- Thread starter letsnoobtehpwns
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The border...Around the screens? Or the fact that they moved one up and one down and filled in the spaces around the screens? I can only think your talking about the filler areas...I thought it was better the way it was done in CoD5, because I could easily tell what was on my screen. If they kept that vertical screen and bunched them right next to eachother, with the colors in that game....that would've turned out very badly >_<Eldritch Warlord said:
To everyone that replied to me thanks for that. To be honest, I really didn't notice that much difference between CoD4 and CoD5, and as for the WWII thing, I had never actually played a WWII game before, so for me it was fine in that regard as well.
Until you stop buying them? And it stops being epic? And until someone actually makes me feel like I am storming the beaches of Normandy? The only game that ever did it for me was that PS2 Medal Of Honor where that was the first level. That was because I was young at the time and was very impressed. Now, it takes a hell of a lot more than that.scorch 13 said:
Personally, when I play video games, I like to kill things. The only other CoD I owned was Finest Hour before my friends totally destroyed my PS2. So, if you have played all of them, then don't buy the next one. I most likely will because they are fun to play.scorch 13 said:
The filler areas, I found it distracting. And everyone I know whose played it agrees. For me the game would be so much better if the border was just black.Mr.Pandah said:
Although I and many of my gamer friends play splitscreen often and are pretty skilled at remembering which screen is theirs.
No, probably not, because it's still a samey first person shooter. World War 2 has been and continues to be done to death, and as fun as Modern Warfare is, it will undeniably meet the same fate. Execute the franchise directors so that maybe a spark of creativity can escape that rerun haven.phar said:
Yeah exactly, why are we the only ones who see this..Kirosilence said:
I think the term is "All Call of Duty games so far have been exactly the same gameplay wise"mokey91 said:
You're just paying 60 bucks for a new campaign actually..
Fantastic Idea for a WW2 Game, make one that is fucked up and inversed, like, let the Bad Guys win for a change, a kind of "what if" Thing, but no..the last Type of WW2-Style Game i played was Battlefield 1942...and only because i could actually play as the "evil guys" not only as American/Russian/Whatever-else-not-part-of-the-Axis as CoD and MoH have done for what..every single Game now? Its getting old and boring overall, changing the Scenery like they did with World at War didnt help, still playing American, Germans replaced by Japanese, big change? I dont think so.
Anyways, they should either make something entirely new like id software is, i mean Nazis doing occult stuff is far better than the same old shit from before. A game should be about having Fun and maybe even experimenting with "What would happen if we do that" instead of making it a interactive History Lesson, especially one that repeats over and over, just with better Graphics.
Anyways, they should either make something entirely new like id software is, i mean Nazis doing occult stuff is far better than the same old shit from before. A game should be about having Fun and maybe even experimenting with "What would happen if we do that" instead of making it a interactive History Lesson, especially one that repeats over and over, just with better Graphics.