At first there was a public outcry from the north, as if millions of voices cried out and were suddenly silenced. 
I find it somewhat amusing that so many nations have a trade-sanction against them that they can't properly feed themselves (because yes, if they were able to fully trade, this would probably not be an issue, even though their production-methods in general are probably sub-par) but we continue to send them aid.Not G. Ivingname said:I don't think so. Kim constantly said they need to reunite the "country," even though Korea obviously two nations, nor did actually say any specific economic, social, or other reforms. Nor did he suggest the simplest solution, step down and formally surrender to the much freer, much more advanced, much richer, and better fed South.
This screams more of a desperate "send us food," message more than anything else. North Korea requires foreign aid to remain anything close to functioning.
There may actually be something to this. He was educated in Europe, and is somewhat westernized as a result. There was some speculation at the time of his rise to power that he'd be more moderate than his father and grandfather, and less of a hardcore communist dictator. I guess time will tell.NicotineStainedSoul said:Another thing is, as much as he is the new dictator, he is still young and unproven and not as venerated as his father or grandfather...yet. He might want his country to go in that direction but he must appease the workers party and the extremely influential military. If i recall when he assumed power there was a complete reshuffle of the military, preventing any immediate threat of coups for power at the point of transition.
Except... trade for what?Realitycrash said:I find it somewhat amusing that so many nations have a trade-sanction against them that they can't properly feed themselves (because yes, if they were able to fully trade, this would probably not be an issue, even though their production-methods in general are probably sub-par) but we continue to send them aid.Not G. Ivingname said:I don't think so. Kim constantly said they need to reunite the "country," even though Korea obviously two nations, nor did actually say any specific economic, social, or other reforms. Nor did he suggest the simplest solution, step down and formally surrender to the much freer, much more advanced, much richer, and better fed South.
This screams more of a desperate "send us food," message more than anything else. North Korea requires foreign aid to remain anything close to functioning.
Maybe we should just trade with them instead?
http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/202/42450.html - According to this article, North Korea doesn't have much of a market to trade with anyway (though it's from 99).
Still, having a total trade-sanction but dumping 500 tons of food a year? Still find it a tad amusing.