Obama does pot?

Recommended Videos

-Orgasmatron-

New member
Nov 3, 2008
1,321
0
0
I don't think you can really 'do' pot, I mean you can, but it makes about as much sense as saying someone 'does' nicotine. You smoke it, he may smoke pot, I don't know about that, but 'doing' pot sounds like sitting in a dirty room by yourself injecting a needle full of ganja into your arm.
 

L33tsauce_Marty

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,198
0
0
Uncompetative said:
Captain Pancake said:
He admitted to doing it once, but not anymore. as I recall, the conversation went something like this:

Obama: "Yes, I have smoked pot before."

Interviewer: "Did you inhale?"

Obama: "That was the point."
I remember that interview. It was the honesty of that response that convinced me that he would be the next President.
This is why this man makes our country look good.
 

gibboss28

New member
Feb 2, 2008
1,715
0
0
WrongSprite said:
gibboss28 said:
Good for him, and I'm meant to care what another person indulges in, on his own time because?
Because he's running the most powerful country in the world.
Ok...I still don't care. He smokes pot, good for him. I hope he enjoys it.
 

tehbeard

New member
Jul 9, 2008
587
0
0
Captain Pancake said:
He admitted to doing it once, but not anymore. as I recall, the conversation went something like this:

Obama: "Yes, I have smoked pot before."

Interviewer: "Did you inhale?"

Obama: "That was the point."
Gotta love him for that quote.

This rumour is probably from the republican camp.
 

yrogerg

New member
Oct 11, 2009
35
0
0
Ammadessi said:
Disclaimer: I do not smoke cigarettes or marijuana, I just think the latter should be legal for the same reasons tobacco and alcohol are.
Powerful financial interests, and also legacy reasons? <.<
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
*sigh* you have to stop listenning to Republican propaganda. Next thing you know, you will think he was born in Africa(dumb, presidents must be born in the states), or he is a terrorist(despite no muslim backround or muslim parents), you get the point. This whole pot thing is just republicans and some democrats who are trying to gain support for the "hate obama" campaign.

And havn't you watched the news lately? Cocaine is where it's at
 

Ammadessi

New member
Oct 6, 2009
222
0
0
yrogerg said:
Ammadessi said:
Disclaimer: I do not smoke cigarettes or marijuana, I just think the latter should be legal for the same reasons tobacco and alcohol are.
Powerful financial interests, and also legacy reasons? <.<
I think marijuana should be legal like alcohol because we've learned that prohibition doesn't work and simply creates crime and criminals.

In the case of tobacco we've learned (in the USA at least) that we can tax the hell out of it and make revenue for the federal government, and since the USA is in more debt than I thought was possible, why not open up a new stream of revenue?

Everyone would be a little more relaxed too, which would be a damn good thing.
 

Earthbound Engineer

New member
Jun 9, 2008
538
0
0
Ph33nix said:
idk if this is true or not but the word on the the grape vine is that Obama smokes pot. can anyone confirm this.
You maybe new to the Escapist, but any thread that begins with "idk" or any other form of Aim Talk for that matter is not going to be taken seriously.

Translation: u mabee nu 2 teh escapiss but ne thred dat beegn w/ idk or ne uthr knd o aim tak 4 dat matr iz not goins 2 b takin srsly!!!1 lol >=(
 

Ammadessi

New member
Oct 6, 2009
222
0
0
Glefistus said:
Uncompetative said:
Captain Pancake said:
He admitted to doing it once, but not anymore. as I recall, the conversation went something like this:

Obama: "Yes, I have smoked pot before."

Interviewer: "Did you inhale?"

Obama: "That was the point."
I remember that interview. It was the honesty of that response that convinced me that he would be the next President.
When the fuck do you NOT inhale doing pot?
Ask Bill Clinton.
 

Rolling Thunder

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,265
0
0
5. The worst economic crisis in the history of the world, seeing business that had survived world war 2 and the great depression collapse and file for bankrupcy.
Sorry Cuddly, but you're talking out of your backside there, if you'll forgive my bluntness. This peculiar little shitstorm has nothing, and I mean nothing, on the Great Depression. Recovery is predicted for all world major economies within the next six months, the unemployment or economic shrinkage is nothing compared to what happened in 1930 alone.


So, sorry, but you're so wrong it's not funny.

My sincerest apologies for the rudeness, but as an economist, I feel the need to point out these statements.
 

yrogerg

New member
Oct 11, 2009
35
0
0
Ammadessi said:
yrogerg said:
Ammadessi said:
Disclaimer: I do not smoke cigarettes or marijuana, I just think the latter should be legal for the same reasons tobacco and alcohol are.
Powerful financial interests, and also legacy reasons? <.<
I think marijuana should be legal like alcohol because we've learned that prohibition doesn't work and simply creates crime and criminals.

In the case of tobacco we've learned (in the USA at least) that we can tax the hell out of it and make revenue for the federal government, and since our the USA is in more debt than I thought was possible, why not open up a new stream of revenue?

Everyone would be a little more relaxed too, which would be a damn good thing.
Until very recently, tobacco was one of the most unregulated products out there. Well, along with guns, perhaps. Up until this year, tobacco and alcohol were the ONLY two things you could put in your body that were a) legal and b) utterly unregulated by the FDA. Alcohol still is, once again, for legacy reasons that are only somewhat related to prohibition. And certainly, many arguments that get floated for why alcohol and tobacco are Special Cases, but things like pot are not, invariably invoke the fact that the early patriots included numerous brewers and tobacco farmers, and marijuana has never had that sort of cultural traction in the US. Legacy.

I mean, I'm not any more a fan of prohibition than the next guy, but let's be honest about what's behind all that, particularly in tobacco's case. Tobacco is a major industry in several states, and every regulation, even with regard to marketing and sales to children, are things that that industry has fought tooth and nail. Both products kill a whole lot of people every year, though, and despite all that, they hold a privileged place that other recreational drugs do not. Personally, instead of tobacco's model, I'd much rather we legalize pot and then actually regulate it.
 

Ammadessi

New member
Oct 6, 2009
222
0
0
yrogerg said:
Until very recently, tobacco was one of the most unregulated products out there. Well, along with guns, perhaps. Up until this year, tobacco and alcohol were the ONLY two things you could put in your body that were a) legal and b) utterly unregulated by the FDA. Alcohol still is, once again, for legacy reasons that are only somewhat related to prohibition. And certainly, many arguments that get floated for why alcohol and tobacco are Special Cases, but things like pot are not, invariably invoke the fact that the early patriots included numerous brewers and tobacco farmers, and marijuana has never had that sort of cultural traction in the US. Legacy.

I mean, I'm not any more a fan of prohibition than the next guy, but let's be honest about what's behind all that, particularly in tobacco's case. Tobacco is a major industry in several states, and every regulation, even with regard to marketing and sales to children, are things that that industry has fought tooth and nail. Both products kill a whole lot of people every year, though, and despite all that, they hold a privileged place that other recreational drugs do not. Personally, instead of tobacco's model, I'd much rather we legalize pot and then actually regulate it.
The founding fathers grew hemp as well as tobacco. Homespun clothing was always made from hemp, sails for ships, the original flag and the US constitution were hemp as well. So I think it's safe to say that if it hadn't been prohibited marijuana would have been as much of a cash crop as tobacco is now.
 

yrogerg

New member
Oct 11, 2009
35
0
0
Ammadessi said:
The founding fathers grew hemp as well as tobacco. Homespun clothing was always made from hemp, sails for ships, the original flag and the US constitution were hemp as well. So I think it's safe to say that if it hadn't been prohibited marijuana would have been as much of a cash crop as tobacco is now.
Except that hemp's a substantially different beast from Marijuana- different subspecies of the same species, yes, but hemp has minimal THC content, and the two plants don't even look alike.

Cannabis sativa sativa is and was used for clothing, sails, paper, etc.

Cannabis sativa indica, on the other hand, makes shitty fabric, and people mainly just use it to get baked. And medicinal reasons. And also to get baked.
 

yrogerg

New member
Oct 11, 2009
35
0
0
Ph33nix said:
this thread seems to have changed topics around page 3...
It's the internet. There's only one direction a thread involving pot could ever go, and that's into a legalization argument.
 

Ammadessi

New member
Oct 6, 2009
222
0
0
yrogerg said:
Ammadessi said:
The founding fathers grew hemp as well as tobacco. Homespun clothing was always made from hemp, sails for ships, the original flag and the US constitution were hemp as well. So I think it's safe to say that if it hadn't been prohibited marijuana would have been as much of a cash crop as tobacco is now.
Except that hemp's a substantially different beast from Marijuana- different subspecies of the same species, yes, but hemp has minimal THC content, and the two plants don't even look alike.

Cannabis sativa sativa is and was used for clothing, sails, paper, etc.

Cannabis sativa indica, on the other hand, makes shitty fabric, and people mainly just use it to get baked. And medicinal reasons. And also to get baked.
True enough, I'm not exactly a scholar on the different strains of cannabis. I remember reading/hearing somewhere that it was more than just the hemp strain that was grown, but since I have no source I will differ to your superior cannabis knowledge.

I'm still for legalization though as it makes very little sense to be putting people in jail for minor possession charges.
 

Ph33nix

New member
Jul 13, 2009
1,243
0
0
yrogerg said:
Ph33nix said:
this thread seems to have changed topics around page 3...
It's the internet. There's only one direction a thread involving pot could ever go, and that's into a legalization argument.
tis a true sad fact