The silence from the peanut gallery isn't because we have all sorts of fascinating insights held back by the flood of usual bile. We've said all we have to say.Redryhno said:...all that's left are the rest of the forum community...
The silence from the peanut gallery isn't because we have all sorts of fascinating insights held back by the flood of usual bile. We've said all we have to say.Redryhno said:...all that's left are the rest of the forum community...
Someone at Obsidian had to approve the text and likely another person put it into the game ... so that's at least one person and likely two who didn't see the problem, or at least not a big enough problem to not take the guys money.Knight Captain Kerr said:Based on what I know about Obsidian and Josh Sawyer this may well have been an oversight and something they otherwise wouldn't have included.
MarsAtlas said:Well that didn't last long. How does that song go? You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
Well, no.So he has sex with somebody, that is revealed to them to be a man, which causes emotional distress on them, and you don't see how this perfectly mirrors a real life sterotype that has caused people to be killed?
How, may I ask, do YOU know that? You're claiming to me that, out of all 7 or 8 billion people on the Earth, not one of them has ever done such a thing?People don't do that. Do I really need that "trapping" isn't a real thing and just a delusion of paranoid straight men that causes some to act violently? Furthermore, they wouldn't be trans because, shockingly, trans women don't think of themselves as men, and vice versa.
See, I didn't get the "There's men pretending to be women to have sex with straight men and cause them emotional distress" bit from the poem.I could read the poem just fine, I know its not directly advocating harm. What it is saying is that "there's men pretending to be women to have sex with straight men and cause them emotional distress". Those people don't exist. Rather, thats what some people think of transgender people. Its not hard to understand why thats an insulting implication.
"We are all just prisoners here, of our own device"Welcome to the Hotel Califonia.
Redryhno said:Snip
I'd be fine with a day or so of normal poster bans, just to see what sort of stuff the normies talk about.ZiggyE said:Snippety
I'm outraged by your apparent lack of outrage.BloatedGuppy said:I see the usual suspects are having an outraged fit in an attempt to demonstrate how having outraged fits on the internet is so outrageous.
Pretty sure you're kinda one of the people I was talking about along with myself...Pyrian said:The silence from the peanut gallery isn't because we have all sorts of fascinating insights held back by the flood of usual bile. We've said all we have to say.Redryhno said:...all that's left are the rest of the forum community...
By your logic theres no expectation to disclose that you have herpes simplex II as long as you're not currently having a visible outbreak.MarsAtlas said:So if I have any physical body feature that somebody doesn't know about prior to sex, and they assault me for it, its morally justifiable? Should I tell people that I have armpit hair before going to bed for them, in case they decide to try and murder me for that?Pr0 said:But I think it would test the patience of any one if they suddenly had a penis waved in their face that they weren't expecting. Man, woman, trans, straight, lesbian...whatever.
There is no dishonesty involved. There is no expectation to disclose the status of one's genitalia before deciding to have sex together. There's no expectation for cisgender men to tell their partners if they're circumcized or not prior to engaging in sex.That doesn't say that assaulting people for being dishonest is acceptable, but that doesn't mean the dishonesty that leads to the potential of an assault isn't the fault of the person that perpetuates it.
I have zero outrage. No outrage at the poem, no outrage at the criticism of the poem, and no outrage at the usual bandwagon of drama queens flipping their shit because the poem was criticized.LostGryphon said:I'm outraged by your apparent lack of outrage.
Simply outrageous.BloatedGuppy said:I have zero outrage. No outrage at the poem, no outrage at the criticism of the poem, and no outrage at the usual bandwagon of drama queens flipping their shit because the poem was criticized.
I mean, you could use the poem as a conversation piece for a discussion about trans-panic, which is a real thing and kind of terrible for transgendered people, but we don't DO discussions here. We just yell about social media and demonstrate our disdain for "social justice" by talking about it every fucking second of every fucking day.
Pillars of Eternity gaming topic? Couldn't even stay on the front page. Pillars of Eternity drama topic? 5 pages and counting. Woop. Carry on, warriors.
If anyone wants to talk about the GAME I'm down for that. That's what everyone wanted, right? Less "politics", more games talk? WHOOPS, my eyes rolled right out of my head.
BloatedGuppy said:If anyone wants to talk about the GAME I'm down for that. That's what everyone wanted, right? Less "politics", more games talk? WHOOPS, my eyes rolled right out of my head.
Imagine a world where this controversy was ignored by everyone as "meh", as it should have been. Or imagine a world where this controversy never existed in the first place.BloatedGuppy said:Pillars of Eternity gaming topic? Couldn't even stay on the front page. Pillars of Eternity drama topic? 5 pages and counting. Woop. Carry on, warriors.
If anyone wants to talk about the GAME I'm down for that. That's what everyone wanted, right? Less "politics", more games talk? WHOOPS, my eyes rolled right out of my head.
Cross-dressing + drunk. That's what I got out of the poem. "The last woman he bedded turned out a man" can imply a cross-dresser or that Firedorn just couldn't tell the difference between a woman and a very feminine-looking man. Also "bedded" means he actually fucked 'em. Pretty sure a sober man can tell the difference between a dick and a vagina.LifeCharacter said:Considering someone who presents themselves as a woman but has male genitalia to be trans is less assuming extra information and more coming to a reasonable conclusion about why someone with male genitalia would be presenting themselves as a woman. Whereas assuming that alcohol was involved is a clear example of adding extra information since there is nothing in the poem to base it off of.Pr0 said:The assumption of trans-misogyny is reached by assuming extra information. The original conclusion was reached by assuming the other individual in the poem is actually transgendered...there is nothing stating that they were.
But apparently that makes me an apologist. I'll tell you a secret: the poem NEEDS the reader to add in extra information. What does "woman turned out a man" mean? Transsexual? Cross-dresser? Was Firedorn too drunk to tell the difference between a woman and a feminine-looking man? It doesn't say. Ergo, all interpretations are equally valid.LifeCharacter said:Right, the reasonable thing is to go out of our way with apologetics to find an alternative explanation for the sole sake of proclaiming that the joke is absolutely not offensive. And, if we need to assume extra details about the story like the character being a drunkard, so be it because not doing so would mean that the joke might be offensive and the PC police might have a point and we can't have that.Pr0 said:Only if you assume, by reading the poem, that the individual that Firedorn bedded was a transsexual at all.
Why would it have to be based aroundMarsAtlas said:Lets just be honest here - do you think that the intention of the joke are the exact series of conditions you provided above (which still overlooks some indicators - "mistaken identity" requires a lot of separate conditions), or just a joke at the expense of trans people?LostGryphon said:Well, no.
I was responding to this, "The implication that trans women are gay men trying to trick straight men into having sex with them?" which is not what I believe to have been implied here. Just because the guy slept with someone he thought was a woman...doesn't mean that the 'woman' in this instance was attempting to trick him into it.
Mistaken identity, plus epic amounts of alcohol, plus a micro penis, plus clever clothing positioning, plus a dark room, and divide that by a penchant for the back door and this...look, I realize this is a lot of 'but maybe if'...but it didn't actually happen. :/ And there are trolls and werewolves and shit. Just roll with it.
Its just a paranoid delusion thought up of by a bunch of heterosexual men who live in perpetual fear of having their sexuality questioned, and I'm not going to entertain the thought of its relevance or significance.How, may I ask, do YOU know that? You're claiming to me that, out of all 7 or 8 billion people on the Earth, not one of them has ever done such a thing?
So then why defend the point?By the same token, it's definitely not something common, nor would I even suggest it was something that happened more than once. Ever. Nor do I think that's what happened in this poem.
The man in the poem killed himself out of shame. That is the exact words used are "crying in shame".See, I didn't get the "There's men pretending to be women to have sex with straight men and cause them emotional distress" bit from the poem.
This shares a blatant real life parallel regarding the suspicion of transgender people.
The poem made no mention of that, I would suggest that without adding anything extra to the poem he simply had some kind of sexual encounter with either a cross dresser or transexual and then the mental trauma made him commit suicide after he found out."The implication that trans women are gay men trying to trick straight men into having sex with them?"
Just out of curiosity, if someone (who doesn't have any STIs) fucked a woman who was passed out, what harm would she suffer, since penis isn't in itself, harmful?MarsAtlas said:Well, see one is harmful, and one isn't. Herpes is harmful, a penis is not. You might not like a penis or a vagina, but so what? Its a physical characteristic like eye colour, body hair, and facial hair, not a disease.Pr0 said:By your logic theres no expectation to disclose that you have herpes simplex II as long as you're not currently having a visible outbreak.
This weird phenomenon you are experiencing is called life. Some people experience it differently than others. For some, humor helps them face what makes them uncomfortable.dragonswarrior said:This isn't there to set up a dark atmosphere. This is there as a joke. It's there to make people laugh, and it ties into a culture and a set of conceptions that leads to a depressingly high number of violent murders and suicides every year.Shinkicker444 said:This is why we can't have nice things.
The Pillar's world is a dark place, or did you miss all the baby and mother murdering?