The biggest difference is that barely anyone notices when there's an all male cast (or 90% male). It's the norm, yet an all female cast is still considered something very exceptional, and will make people assume that there's some sort of statement being made.Bobular said:Has Ghostbusters taught them nothing? I wouldn't mind a female lead, I wouldn't mind a majority female cast, but an all female cast just screams 'look at me, I'm being progressive'. With eight main cast and not a single male there is no excuse it just seems to be sexism the other way, an all female cast is no better than an all male cast they are both just different sides of the same coin.
I don't doubt that the main reason that people are even able to make movies with all female casts is by coasting on the public interest in "progressiveness", but it just means that we're in a time period where they can actually try something like that. Hopefully when all the fervor dies down it will be considered something more normal and someone won't have to jump through a series of hoops to have either gender comprise the majority of the cast.