You wouldn't happen to have a picture?bdcjacko said:I demand that it be my home made bitter.
A picture of beer? I do not...but I could easily make one.subtlefuge said:You wouldn't happen to have a picture?bdcjacko said:I demand that it be my home made bitter.
I dunno, just saying "my homebrew" doesn't say much. I always like to see the coloration anyway.bdcjacko said:A picture of beer? I do not...but I could easily make one.subtlefuge said:You wouldn't happen to have a picture?bdcjacko said:I demand that it be my home made bitter.
Your lucky I'm tired of being sober right now.subtlefuge said:I dunno, just saying "my homebrew" doesn't say much. I always like to see the coloration anyway.bdcjacko said:A picture of beer? I do not...but I could easily make one.subtlefuge said:You wouldn't happen to have a picture?bdcjacko said:I demand that it be my home made bitter.
Can someone please explain to me how this is not grammatical homicide?subtlefuge said:If Frank Lloyd Wright [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lloyd_Wright] would have been commissioned to design an award, it would look something like this:
-snip-
Winners Don't Drink and Drive. Ever.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Never drink Fosters, that's fucking horrific!Zantos said:It should be a personal favourite of mine.
Take 568ml of Fosters. Drink. Repeat until you can't see.
Of course I'll answer you.StBishop said:Can someone please explain to me how this is not grammatical homicide?
Surely the correct words to convey the meaning you're trying to express are "If Frank Lloyd Wright had been".
This is a massive (i can't say pet hate, it's worse, it causes me to spew bile in utter rage, but let's go with pet hate anyway) pet hate of mine. I've noticed it a lot in Northern American speech, and I find it especially abhorrent from people who're otherwise well spoken (or well written?) according to wikipedia, this is not an acceptable usage of the word would. [ulr=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_modal_verb#Would]Source[/url].
Is this taught as correct grammar anywhere? I understand that some things vary from place to place "Zee" rather than "Zed", "Haych" rather than "Aych" (No "Huh" sound in the letter H when pronouncing it), "eether" and "iither", but most of these come down to pronounciation, not actual usages of words.
Please answer me.
Someone!
Sorry, I just realised it may have come across as a personal attack, as I said it's a pet hate. I thought it was intentional. I hear it a lot on TV in shows from the States and in children's shows (of which many seem to be Canadian here) and I was hoping that someone would just tell me it's taught as correct grammar in North America.subtlefuge said:Of course I'll answer you.StBishop said:Can someone please explain to me how this is not grammatical homicide?
Surely the correct words to convey the meaning you're trying to express are "If Frank Lloyd Wright had been".
This is a massive (i can't say pet hate, it's worse, it causes me to spew bile in utter rage, but let's go with pet hate anyway) pet hate of mine. I've noticed it a lot in Northern American speech, and I find it especially abhorrent from people who're otherwise well spoken (or well written?) according to wikipedia, this is not an acceptable usage of the word would. [ulr=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_modal_verb#Would]Source[/url].
Is this taught as correct grammar anywhere? I understand that some things vary from place to place "Zee" rather than "Zed", "Haych" rather than "Aych" (No "Huh" sound in the letter H when pronouncing it), "eether" and "iither", but most of these come down to pronounciation, not actual usages of words.
Please answer me.
Someone!
It was a grammatical oversight caused by me referencing a famous architect, only to remember he was dead. I then changed the tense without considering grammar, and posted it. The original phrase was "was" which I changed to "would have been".
It's a mild butchering, but one caused by a simple error. Do you scrutinize the grammar in all topics this heavily, or am I special?
Cheers.
"Would have" is correct when used as an impossible conditional (if...then) statement. "If I had won the lottery, then I would have bought a new house."StBishop said:Sorry, I just realised it may have come across as a personal attack, as I said it's a pet hate. I thought it was intentional. I hear it a lot on TV in shows from the States and in children's shows (of which many seem to be Canadian here) and I was hoping that someone would just tell me it's taught as correct grammar in North America.
I tend to pick up on "would have" being used incorrectly instantly because I hate it so much and because I'm aware of how frustrated it makes me. I do scrutinize most posts for grammar though, or anything I'm reading for that matter. You are still special though because I tend to try my best to avoid being a grammar Nazi on forums unless the post is directed at me specifically. I save all of my correcting for face to face encounters, complaining about advertisements, and Facebook.
Actually you have to do them as shots, 4 in a row, in order.Berethond said:The Four Horsemen:
Equal parts Jim Beam, Jack Daniels, Scotch Whiskey, and Jose Cuervo.
Mix the four, then down immediately.
As an Australian, the land where Fosters comes from I can safely say that it is one of the worst drinks in the world (and i think every Australian agree's with me)Zantos said:It should be a personal favourite of mine.
Take 568ml of Fosters. Drink. Repeat until you can't see.
Regular White Russians are my drink of choice, but that sounds FANTASTIC O.OHarry Mason said:The Geeky White Russian
2 shots of Vodka
1 shot of your favorite coffee liquor
1 shot of Amaretto liquor
1 scoop of vanilla ice cream
3 ice cubes
And fill the rest of the glass with milk or light cream. Use a drinking glass, a reglar high ball wont be enough. I drink it all the time while a browse these forums (which may explain my behavior...)
Here's a slogan...
The GWR! Drinks as smooth as the Daily Drop's camera's frame rate, and kicks like Yahtzee's temper!
So Fosters really is Australian? I always thought that is was Faux-Aussie.Zenode said:As an Australian, the land where Fosters comes from I can safely say that it is one of the worst drinks in the world (and i think every Australian agree's with me)Zantos said:It should be a personal favourite of mine.
Take 568ml of Fosters. Drink. Repeat until you can't see.
for me
1 shot of Lemon Juice
1 shot of white rum
1 shot of vodka
1 shot of tequila
2 shots of Coca Cola
That'll get ya good and going
Yeah, I actually made it because I LOVE White Russians, and I was trying to get my wimpy friend to love them too. To that end I added Amaretto, thinking it would make it sweeter and therefore more palatable, but then it tasted too strong. The ice cream was meant to make it into an alcoholic milk shake, but once the ice cream melts it's just like a really rich White Russian with a coffee taste.ChildofGallifrey said:Regular White Russians are my drink of choice, but that sounds FANTASTIC O.OHarry Mason said:The Geeky White Russian
2 shots of Vodka
1 shot of your favorite coffee liquor
1 shot of Amaretto liquor
1 scoop of vanilla ice cream
3 ice cubes
And fill the rest of the glass with milk or light cream. Use a drinking glass, a reglar high ball wont be enough. I drink it all the time while a browse these forums (which may explain my behavior...)
Here's a slogan...
The GWR! Drinks as smooth as the Daily Drop's camera's frame rate, and kicks like Yahtzee's temper!
Jack Daniels is roughly the quality of "well" whiskey, and twice the price. It tastes good with coke, but so does the cheapest of liquor.Harry Mason said:As a side note, anyone citing Jack Danials as the manliest drink in all the land needs to have their man (or woman) card revoked. Jack Danials is piss water that is only good for getting alcohol poisoning. If you want to grow chest hair and not destroy your wallet, look no farther than Black Label. It's affordable, twice as mean as Jack, and has a flavor other than "cheap hooch."
![]()