Oh Apple, you bastards.

[Yokai]

The only Apple product I own is an iPod Touch, and I'm proud of the fact. However, even that suffers the taint of their relentless cash-grabbing--you can only watch videos on the internet via Youtube, because they've struck a deal with Apple. Vimeo and any site that uses its own video hosting is worthless on an iPod or iPhone.

The point is, the bastards will do whatever they can to maximize profits at the expense of their customers, which is why I only buy their products when I have obvious evidence that they're superior to the alternatives.

 

[MorphingDragon]

Tiger was EOLed a long time ago. If they haven't upgraded yet they are far behind the curve. Its like complaining that IE9 doesn't work on XP SP2. You've been deprecated for awhile now, get over it.

 

[Lilani]

I do like the Apple products that I own, and I do plan to continue buying them in the future, but I think this was a very poor business choice. I have heard numerous accolades about Apple's service and care for each customer (I can also attest to this), and I've heard lots of praise about how durable their products are and how long they last.

And those people who have the old stuff are a testament to that. They use their old machines and products because they've still got plenty of life left. The quality of the product has stood the test of time. That is the point of a large investment--you spend a lot upfront so it lasts that much longer. For Apple to drop those products, even though the company is richer than God, it completely undermines that aspect of their marketing, and totally invalidates any sort of faith their customers have in the lasting power of their purchases.

I might just send an email to Apple tonight. This is just sad. I hope they turn this around at once.

 

[Lunar Templar]

I think this is appropriate at this point.

I remember the first time I played with Mac II, and hated it because I was a UNIX baby. Never really warmed up to Apple.

the mustang is nicer then some fancy foreign thing just sayin

OT::
this, makes me glad my 'ipod' is a Phillips Vibe, none of this software updating non-sense to get between me an tunes

 

[Super Toast]

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

 

[Macgyvercas]

I guess quoting LRR would be approprate at this point:

"Then Xerox made a prototype, Steve Jobs came on the scene. Spoke of mice and menus, windows, icons, a trash and a bitmap screen. Old Stevie said to Xerox "Boys, turn your heads and cough". And when no one was lookin' he ripped their interfaces off. Copied every single feature that he had seen, put it in a cute box with a tiny little screen. Mac OS 1 ran that machine, only cost five thousand bucks. But it was slow, it was buggy, so they wrote it again, and now their up to OS 10. They'll charge you for the beta, then charge you again, but the Mac OS still sucks."

But, yeah. I can't see how this will bode well for Apple. Not that I ever understood how Apple stayed afloat anyway. Take any Mac computer, and you can get a comparable PC for about half the price.

 

[Small Waves]

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

Yes how dare technology evolve.

 

[Super Toast]

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

Yes how dare technology evolve.

That's not why I hate Apple. I hate the fact that they screwed over a massive amount of their usebase for the sake of a quick cash-grab.

 

[mjc0961]

I think this is relevant.

Spoiler

I think this is appropriate at this point.

Spoiler

I remember the first time I played with Mac II, and hated it because I was a UNIX baby. Never really warmed up to Apple.

That was good too.

Anyway, I just got done upgrading iTunes with no bullshit. Thanks Windows!

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

Yes how dare technology evolve.

Oh, is that what this is? Evolution of technology? I thought it was just screwing customers up the ass without lube. Thanks for setting me straight. /sarcasm

 

[instantbenz]

I think this is appropriate at this point.

I remember the first time I played with Mac II, and hated it because I was a UNIX baby. Never really warmed up to Apple.

This made my day, thank you! I mean, you didn't have much to compete against ... moving 5 tons of stone blocks and taco pie, then this. That image wins. I'm very ant-imac. I think owning apple-anything makes you look ignorant of how much you're spending for something that might work, but gives problems such as the op's message. Macs advertise that they don't take much to run and they start instantly. Wrong. Macs get just as bogged down just as quickly as pc with installed software. I won't even start on flash [idiotic to attempt to quit it cold turkey]

BUT! I will say other mp3 players do the SAME thing with firmware updates that make the machine completely unusable.

 

[Small Waves]

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

Yes how dare technology evolve.

That's not why I hate Apple. I hate the fact that they screwed over a massive amount of their usebase for the sake of a quick cash-grab.

Oh, is that what this is? Evolution of technology? I thought it was just screwing customers up the ass without lube. Thanks for setting me straight. /sarcasm

1. He was still using Tiger, which debuted in 2005 and hasn't had support since November 2007.

2. On the Apple site it states the minimum system requirements for iPods, iPhones, etc.

3. Leopard came out three and a half years ago, and it still runs all of that shit even though Snow Leopard has been out for two years.

My old Macbook from 2005 has Leopard and can work with all iPods, the iPhone G4, and even the new iPad. It is installed on all non-Intel Macs on the main Apple site. Why should they offer support for an OS nobody uses anymore? If you haven't updated your computer in four years, you have no right to ***** and complain about "being left behind".

 

[mjc0961]

*snip*

What you just said would make sense if it was some revolutionary new technology that the 4 year old Macs couldn't run. But we're talking about iTunes and some phones and MP3 players. To try and justify needing a new OS just for that is taking fanboyism to an extreme that I've never even seen from the most diehard Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo fanboys when it comes to video games. Again, we're talking about software that manages a god damned media library. If it can run on Windows XP, a nearly 10 year old operating system, but not "Tiger", which is just over 6 years old, then there's a massive problem there.

And I'll say it one last time. They're trying to run media library management software on a 4 year old MacBook, not an iMac G3 from 1998.

 

[Super Toast]

Oh Apple, you make it far too easy for us to hate you.

Yes how dare technology evolve.

That's not why I hate Apple. I hate the fact that they screwed over a massive amount of their usebase for the sake of a quick cash-grab.

1. He was still using Tiger, which debuted in 2005 and hasn't had support since November 2007

2. On the Apple site it states the minimum system requirements for iPods, iPhones, etc.

3. Leopard came out three and a half years ago, and it still runs all of that shit even though Snow Leopard has been out for two years.

My old Macbook from 2005 has Leopard and can work with all iPods, the iPhone G4, and even the new iPad. All of their product lines haven't supported Tiger in months. Why should they offer support for an OS nobody uses anymore?

I can tell you're an Apple fanboy, and that arguing with you would be an exercise in futility. And on that note, I bid you farewell. Just two things:

1: If something is only five years old and considered obsolete, then I don't want anything to do with the company who made that call.

2: Windows XP is ten years old and is only now starting to die out. Just sayin'.

 

[SniperWolf427]

I haven't posted in these forums for nearly a year now but I needed to log back in just to reply to this thread.

All of the Apple hate here is, frankly, very unnecessary. They are a business and they wish to make money; a lot of companies do the exact same thing. Apple is not despicable simply because they do not want to continue to support ancient software. The user can either accept this ultimatum and spend the (honestly, very little) money to upgrade to a newer OS, or they can remain in the past and unsupported.

I really don't see the problem here.

 

[WorldFree55]

I think this is appropriate at this point.

I remember the first time I played with Mac II, and hated it because I was a UNIX baby. Never really warmed up to Apple.

When i get a PC, my PC is a Mercedes Mclaren!

Awwwwww yeah!

 

[mjc0961]

I can tell you're an Apple fanboy, and that arguing with you would be an exercise in futility. And on that note, I bid you farewell. Just two things:

1: If something is only five years old and considered obsolete, then I don't want anything to do with the company who made that call.

2: Windows XP is ten years old and is only now starting to die out. Just sayin'.

Spoiler: Excellent posting!

When a company thinks something a mere 5 years old is obsolete (and, by the way, thinks that service pack style upgrades like "Snow Leopard" and "Lion" should be sold to the consumer instead of provided free of charge; don't ask for more money until you've got Mac OS 11 ready. You don't see Microsoft charging $30 for Windows 7 service pack 1, but yet they're the ones who get a stupid dollar sign placed in their name?!), I want nothing to do with them.

Especially when part of the draw of their massive prices for those computers is "They're future proof, get it now and use it for years and years and years!" Hmm. Or I could spend less money building my own computer, putting Windows on it, and not having to pay $30 for an OS upgrade just to keep running a piece of software that handles the extremely advanced task of managing a media library.

And you're right, no sense arguing with anyone who would actually defend such an awful business practice.

 

[Super Toast]

I can tell you're an Apple fanboy, and that arguing with you would be an exercise in futility. And on that note, I bid you farewell. Just two things:

1: If something is only five years old and considered obsolete, then I don't want anything to do with the company who made that call.

2: Windows XP is ten years old and is only now starting to die out. Just sayin'.

Spoiler: Excellent posting!

When a company thinks something a mere 5 years old is obsolete (and, by the way, thinks that service pack style upgrades like "Snow Leopard" and "Lion" should be sold to the consumer instead of provided free of charge; don't ask for more money until you've got Mac OS 11 ready. You don't see Microsoft charging $30 for Windows 7 service pack 1, but yet they're the ones who get a stupid dollar sign placed in their name?!), I want nothing to do with them.

Especially when part of the draw of their massive prices for those computers is "They're future proof, get it now and use it for years and years and years!" Hmm. Or I could spend less money building my own computer, putting Windows on it, and not having to pay $30 for an OS upgrade just to keep running a piece of software that handles the extremely advanced task of managing a media library.

And you're right, no sense arguing with anyone who would actually defend such an awful business practice.

I love that gif.

And yeah, a friend of mine loves Apple and always brings it up in conversation, so I've had this argument a million times before.

 

[Plurralbles]

i don't understand you apple, you're steadily increasing your market share and you have an entire generation of people behind you... You could be making billions more over the long term... but no.. You'd rather have this short lived burst of profit...

Then what when your customers move away to companies that don't treat them like shit?

 

[Smerf]

i hate mac. i dual boot my laptop, Xp for gaming and Linux for everything else

 

[Small Waves]

What you just said would make sense if it was some revolutionary new technology that the 4 year old Macs couldn't run. But we're talking about iTunes and some phones and MP3 players. To try and justify needing a new OS just for that is taking fanboyism to an extreme that I've never even seen from the most diehard Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo fanboys when it comes to video games.

Every single time their iPods introduce a new feature, they also need to update iTunes to coincide with said-features. They still make updates for Leopard because people still use Leopard, while Tiger users are in a very small minority.

Again, we're talking about software that manages a god damned media library. If it can run on Windows XP, a nearly 10 year old operating system, but not "Tiger", which is just over 6 years old, then there's a massive problem there.

Even after Vista and 7 being released, XP is STILL the most used operating system in the world. Go to your typical high school computer lab. Odds are they're still rocking it with XP. Tiger, on the other hand, is used by a very small percentile. Apple sales climbed higher and higher by the year, and every Mac from the Apple store has come installed with Leopard since 2008 and Snow Leopard on all Intel Macs since its release.

It's about demand and payoff. It would be a stupid business move to spend thousands of more manhours to make something support a system that so few use. Remember, iPods, iPads, and iPhones run on their OWN separate operating system. It was probably a huge pain in the ass to continue giving support for older systems for this long. Only the iPod needs to work with a computer to function, while the iPhone and iPad can work independently.