This ,and if the community`s still going strong then you should find some great maps toocurlycrouton said:Warcraft III. It's just superb, and it's relatively low-spec so you shouldn't have trouble running it.
This ,and if the community`s still going strong then you should find some great maps toocurlycrouton said:Warcraft III. It's just superb, and it's relatively low-spec so you shouldn't have trouble running it.
Fast games mean that they are fast paced, your talking about whether its quick to start off with or not. Slow games are ones that if you missed 2 minutes in the main part of the game you would suffer dearly for it, which both games have occurring there. Whereas Supreme commander, you could walk away for five and nothing bad could happen and your forces can still be productive.Mazty said:Starcraft is really slow. Start it up and see how long it takes to get into the action. The resource system and tech tree take ages to advance as well as jut building average troops.Inconsistancies Arise said:I'm sorry to point out, but starcraft is not slow, Supreme commander is slow (40 mins to build 1 unit?!). Also i found that with DoW the basic units became useless at the end, whereas starcraft's ones are always useful.Mazty said:Unlike Starcraft, which someone will yell is good, it isn't nearly as slow as Starcraft
OT- Don't get starcraft as your first RTS on PC, cause the steep difficulty curve will put you off the game and genre. Go something simple first as these people are nicely suggesting, Warcraft 3.
And I've no idea how you were playing DoW, but all the troops always have a role to play, no matter how far into the battle you are, especially emphasised in the last 2 expansion packs.
Supreme Commander isn't a slow game, it's a long game, quite different.
KingPiccolOwned said:I say Rome: Total War, and the whole Total War franchise past that installment.
DAMN NINJAD! and I didn't even see it.gof22 said:Rome Total War is quite good.
It isn't that slow. You can easily get into fights at around the 2-3 minute mark and there are things that occupy you before that. DoW is faster but it's a game where an average match lasts 15 minutes or so with a lot of randomness going on that isn't there in Starcraft. Supreme Commander, though, is much slower than either of those. It's kind of its thing.Mazty said:Starcraft is really slow. Start it up and see how long it takes to get into the action. The resource system and tech tree take ages to advance as well as jut building average troops.
Yea, so it wasn't just me thinking that the game was lackluster compared to the others. Good, i was afraid that i was getting sick of DOW.... played DOW2? how goods that? My computers specs just cant run it.Mazty said:-Snip-
I used to play tabletop 40k, and my team was Dark Eldar.
Soulstorm was a complete joke to be brutally honest. Dark Eldar utterly suck, as well as Sisters of Battle. I have yet to find any advantages with them. It was almost as if the devs didn't even give them a test run to see if they were balanced!
All Soulstorm really did was fix the hideous balance issue of Dark Crusade (Space Marines were the best troop in every way), but gave you two new broken teams
Such a damn shame as Dark Eldar and Sisters of Battle could have been so good.