.Tips_of_Fingers said:
I would like to voice my interest in this. Expect a sheet soon.
.Tips_of_Fingers said:
I fucking love it. My only gripe is that the biography should be in the first person. Other than that though, it has so much potential for interesting character interaction. I can only begin to imagine the fun that will stem from his story. Also, I have to applaud your novel approach to the "What The History Books Say" section; I personally find the final sentence a work of fucking genius.PleasantKenobi said:Old Man Claudio Snip
I like the character and your writing is pretty solid (although I knew that anyway). There are a few spelling and grammatical errors here and there but nothing major. I like the idea that Marcus has gained a whole bunch of stories from various people; it could mean that his story takes teh form of a myth or legend that he has heard along his travels. In saying that though, I'm also drawn to the sword, Sigurd. The fact that it has a name implies that there is a story behind it. I have to ask though: why does Marcus not have a surname? Is there any particular reason?Dectomax said:Marcus Snip
A very intriguing sheet. I like that you've gone a relatively different route with your character. I read the biography in a very pompous, self-assured and posh accent. The arrogance that he implies would make for some great characer interaction and I like that he is an anti-hero, complete with a troubled past that manifests itself as - what I feel to be - the rather bizzarre and somewhat misguided act of cross-dressing. One tiny, tiny, tiny problem I have with the sheet is the mention of a watch...standard fantasy = no watches, I'm afraid. Other than that, it's fine.CloggedDonkey said:Jarvis/Jarvia Karthund
I'll begin by syaing that your writing is still not up to the standard that I would want. The other sheets posted so far are within the standard I would expect for this RP. A lack of paragraph spacing is also a pain but easily remedied. Spelling isn't bad but the grammar and use (or lack thereof) of punctuation hurts my face. Just look at - and take note of - the other submission's use of commas and stuff. That's the kind of thing you need to pay much more attention to.avouleance2nd said:Layi Snip
Yeah - I know there are a few errors in there somewhere, I'll go through my sheet again later and try and stomp them out. The swords name is also from an old Norse myth - I'll leave it at that.Tips_of_Fingers said:Here are my thoughts on the sheets submitted so far.
I like the character and your writing is pretty solid (although I knew that anyway). There are a few spelling and grammatical errors here and there but nothing major. I like the idea that Marcus has gained a whole bunch of stories from various people; it could mean that his story takes teh form of a myth or legend that he has heard along his travels. In saying that though, I'm also drawn to the sword, Sigurd. The fact that it has a name implies that there is a story behind it. I have to ask though: why does Marcus not have a surname? Is there any particular reason?Dectomax said:Marcus Snip
I know the myth well, I'm curious to see how it pans out in this RP.Dectomax said:Yeah - I know there are a few errors in there somewhere, I'll go through my sheet again later and try and stomp them out. The swords name is also from an old Norse myth - I'll leave it at that.Tips_of_Fingers said:Here are my thoughts on the sheets submitted so far.
I like the character and your writing is pretty solid (although I knew that anyway). There are a few spelling and grammatical errors here and there but nothing major. I like the idea that Marcus has gained a whole bunch of stories from various people; it could mean that his story takes teh form of a myth or legend that he has heard along his travels. In saying that though, I'm also drawn to the sword, Sigurd. The fact that it has a name implies that there is a story behind it. I have to ask though: why does Marcus not have a surname? Is there any particular reason?Dectomax said:Marcus Snip
As for his second name, He believes that as he has no family, he has none. It's been long forgotten over his years of travel and everyone simply refers to him as Marcus, wanderer or some other term related to travelling.
If there's anything you'd like changed or added, let me know and I'll get on it!
I doubt I'd include the myth in this RP, though there may be references to it within a story. Or atleast if I decide to make use of the sword.Mortis Nuncius said:I know the myth well, I'm curious to see how it pans out in this RP.Dectomax said:Yeah - I know there are a few errors in there somewhere, I'll go through my sheet again later and try and stomp them out. The swords name is also from an old Norse myth - I'll leave it at that.Tips_of_Fingers said:Here are my thoughts on the sheets submitted so far.
I like the character and your writing is pretty solid (although I knew that anyway). There are a few spelling and grammatical errors here and there but nothing major. I like the idea that Marcus has gained a whole bunch of stories from various people; it could mean that his story takes teh form of a myth or legend that he has heard along his travels. In saying that though, I'm also drawn to the sword, Sigurd. The fact that it has a name implies that there is a story behind it. I have to ask though: why does Marcus not have a surname? Is there any particular reason?Dectomax said:Marcus Snip
As for his second name, He believes that as he has no family, he has none. It's been long forgotten over his years of travel and everyone simply refers to him as Marcus, wanderer or some other term related to travelling.
If there's anything you'd like changed or added, let me know and I'll get on it!![]()
I'd definitely recommend having some people proof-read your work. It's difficult to critique your own work....avouleance2nd said:Thanks for the feedback I'll work on ironing out the issues you mentioned.
I will admit I often have problem with grammar and spelling. I do read through the stuff myself but I just don?t seem to notice the problems. I?ll try to get some friends to help out when I can.
If that?s not good enough I?m sorry.
Also before I write it down and add it into the sheet I might as well check this is ok, I was going to justify Layi?s feeling a surprising amount of guilt when she hurts people without meaning it by the logic she feels more bad about the waste of suffering. The same way a hunter might be ok will killing an animal providing they were able to eat it after woods but regretting it if they killed someone without using the body. Would that suffice as an explanation?
Finally apart from the problems with spelling is there anything wrong with my style? It might be some of the problems are things I?m doing deliberately for dramatic effect in which case I might not see them as problems.
I was thinking a pocket-watch, which I guess depends on the series, but alright, I'll give it a quick change. Just check the sheet post in a few minutes.Tips_of_Fingers said:A very intriguing sheet. I like that you've gone a relatively different route with your character. I read the biography in a very pompous, self-assured and posh accent. The arrogance that he implies would make for some great characer interaction and I like that he is an anti-hero, complete with a troubled past that manifests itself as - what I feel to be - the rather bizzarre and somewhat misguided act of cross-dressing. One tiny, tiny, tiny problem I have with the sheet is the mention of a watch...standard fantasy = no watches, I'm afraid. Other than that, it's fine.CloggedDonkey said:Jarvis/Jarvia Karthund
While I'm not a player I read it and did indeed understand it. I also noticed your rather direct parallels to the Roman Empire; as well as introducing a new(?) computation of time, known only as in the year of our lord; are you also introducing Christianity into this universe or does it simply refer to whatever monotheistic religion these 'romans' may have had?TheIronRuler said:EDIT: Hey, players, could you please read my sheet and tell me whether or not you fully understood it? I'll appreciate it greatly.
.The Hairminator said:While I'm not a player I read it and did indeed understand it. I also noticed your rather direct parallels to the Roman Empire; as well as introducing a new(?) computation of time, known only as in the year of our lord; are you also introducing Christianity into this universe or does it simply refer to whatever monotheistic religion these 'romans' may have had?TheIronRuler said:EDIT: Hey, players, could you please read my sheet and tell me whether or not you fully understood it? I'll appreciate it greatly.
Okie dokie. Friends before RPs and all that jazz....avouleance2nd said:Sad to say it but looking at the time this will require I don't think I can contribute.
I don't want to inconvenience my friends and without them i couldn't really do this so sorry I?ll withdraw my application.
Haha, from pocket-watch to knife? Quite a jump! Thanks for changing it though. = DCloggedDonkey said:I was thinking a pocket-watch, which I guess depends on the series, but alright, I'll give it a quick change. Just check the sheet post in a few minutes.
In the interest of creating some kind of comprehensive fictional world, can i ask that you refer to the 'In the year of our lords' as I was planning on introducing a large religous organisation that parallels the Christian church but moving away from monotheism and using a doctrine that suggests the world was created by a group of gods referred to not by name, but by the title Lord and whatever it was they were meant to have contributed to the creation of the world.TheIronRuler said:'In the year of our lord' did come from Latin, referring to Jesus Christ, but I do not want to involve any real world aspects in this fable. Instead I will use this dating system since it concerns the affairs of the Empire (And because using the Japanese dating system is a kick in a balls. No, I will not make a bloodline of all of the emperors and the time in which they ruled. I have a life. Sort of).
.PleasantKenobi said:In the interest of creating some kind of comprehensive fictional world, can i ask that you refer to the 'In the year of our lords' as I was planning on introducing a large religous organisation that parallels the Christian church but moving away from monotheism and using a doctrine that suggests the world was created by a group of gods referred to not by name, but by the title Lord and whatever it was they were meant to have contributed to the creation of the world.TheIronRuler said:'In the year of our lord' did come from Latin, referring to Jesus Christ, but I do not want to involve any real world aspects in this fable. Instead I will use this dating system since it concerns the affairs of the Empire (And because using the Japanese dating system is a kick in a balls. No, I will not make a bloodline of all of the emperors and the time in which they ruled. I have a life. Sort of).
I only ask as it is such a small change that would make the reading of the final product seem more unified. Of course, if this fucks with your ideas too much, then no worries.