Well, in the serious versions, the Riddler is extremely dark. Contemptuous of everyone as he see himself as the most intelligent person ever and everyone else as idiotic replaceable scum hence why most of his traps involve his goons dying also, with the exception of Batman as he sees him as a rival.. So, I'd imagine he'd be the 'Evil, cold logic, calculating, out for himself kind of guy.' If, you played Batman: Arkham Asylum, they did a a decent job of his personality toward the end when he gets frustrated and dark.notsosavagemessiah said:still, my biggest question is what kind of riddler will we see? It won't an over the top campy one ala jim carrey, but how can you take a character like that seriously without him becoming a clone of the joker? Also, how can you make him a big enough threat to gotham? Any ideas?
Almost the case in Batman Begins, with the slightly better known Scarecrow taking point, and Ra's Al Ghul being the big bad.FaceFaceFace said:Hush teamed up with the Riddler in his premiere. Assuming it doesn't get overcrowded like, say "Batman and Robin," both could work well. Then you'd have the popular Riddler to draw audiences and the less well-known Hush to be awesome.viranimus said:I really hope, that they havent written the riddler in stone. I would like to see them bypass the riddler all together.
I would really like to see a villian like Bane, or Hush.
I watched Heat quite recently. Between the 'GREAT ASS!' and Al Pacino beating up Henry Rollins (really?) I realised just how bad that movie is.DarthLurtz said:The reason there was focus on him was because it was a kind of cameo, as he played one of the characters in the more recent version of Heat, a heist movie with Pacino and DeNiro.
I would have to disagree with this I have seen Tennant play Hamlet alongside Patrick Stewart , and I have to admit that Tennant was pretty awesome.Novskij said:That would ruin it.Just_A_Glitch said:A good theory, but I'm still hoping for David Tennant.
Because every time i see him, i think of that redicoulous and cheesy doctor who series, and i dont really think Tennant is that strong an actor, but i could be wrong.
You're taking a risk calling Doctor Who cheesy in a den of dorks.Novskij said:That would ruin it.Just_A_Glitch said:A good theory, but I'm still hoping for David Tennant.
Because every time i see him, i think of that redicoulous and cheesy doctor who series, and i dont really think Tennant is that strong an actor, but i could be wrong.
I like it. I like it a lot.SalamanderJoe said:snip
She was in a warehouse full of explosives. You can see she's still in the building when it blows up, and the warehouse is completely levelled. If she can survive that, she's not Catwoman she's Wonder Woman.Gxas said:I like it. I like it a lot.SalamanderJoe said:snip
Also, did you happen to notice that they never explicitly stated that Rachel died? Sure, we saw the explosion, but so what? We were never shown a body. Never a funeral, no mourning.
CATWOMAN!
I would honestly be ok with that too.Geo Da Sponge said:She was in a warehouse full of explosives. You can see she's still in the building when it blows up, and the warehouse is completely levelled. If she can survive that, she's not Catwoman she's Wonder Woman.Gxas said:I like it. I like it a lot.SalamanderJoe said:snip
Also, did you happen to notice that they never explicitly stated that Rachel died? Sure, we saw the explosion, but so what? We were never shown a body. Never a funeral, no mourning.
CATWOMAN!
i only noticed victor zsasz on my second run through of that filmThat said:Hmmm that is a very good theory going on there, but I have a feeling that it will be Joseph Gordon Levitt (or Robin Williams).
Edit: I want to see Sazh in the next one, I mean Nolans already established that the character exists.