AgentCLXXXIII post=18.72004.745700 said:
If it can be used without killing the child, then good.
If it requires killing the child and preventing him from living out his life, then we have crossed the line.
It is murder if you kill an unborn child for another human being already alive.
Is a blastocyst a "child"? It's a couple hundred unimplanted, undifferentiated cells. IIRC, technically speaking it barely qualifies as an "embryo."
It could become a child. It could become two or three children if it splits. It could fail to implant and the potential mother
won't even notice because the blastocyst is microscopic and isn't really interacting much with her body at this point.
Is an egg fertilized
in vitro and then never injected into a patient a "child"?
...
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.72004.745723 said:
Semen, though non-thinking, is still alive. The scientific jibber jabber behind it matters not.
The microbes in my GI tract are alive, too. Does that make them morally equivalent to a person?
-- Alex