Duskwaith said:
thehype097 said:
Duskwaith said:
thehype097 said:
Duskwaith said:
thehype097 said:
Duskwaith said:
I would respect my enemy. Just because they are terrorists does not mean they are degraded to animals.
The British Army respected the IRA theres even a picture of a British Soldier saluting the coffin of an IRA volunteer as it passed by. Just shows the calibre of the people involved.
Americans just let themselves down once again. Fox news will be having a field day on this crap
So because he was attacked in response to an act of war thats treating him like an animal? If he wasn't respected he would've been brought back to the US and tortured. He was quickly killed and buried at sea in a fashion required by his religion buy US soldiers. A religion he killed thousands of Americans in the name of and he was laid to rest by Americans in the way that religion demands. Yeah... How disrespectful huh?
This thread is about the celebrations about his death so quite frankly i find your point irrelevant. Typical is all i can think
You said he, the enemy, was treated like an animal. you didn't specify that you meant celebrations. Which is also nothing like being treated like animals (Do you know a lot of people who celebrate animal deaths?) So quite frankly i find your point to be nonsensical. Smug is all I can think.
Hunted like an animal is what you seem to be missing other than being draped in an American Flag not to mention the dehumanisation of Osama wherein people are out rejoicing in the streets at the death of someone.Tasteless and arrogant. So your misunderstanding of my post gives you the basis for this argument? Not to mention I used that example to show the respect between two enemies afterall soldiers/civilians where against Osama(as proven by the celebrations which we should be talking about before once again your afermentioned misunderstanding of me post derailed us from) and he against them ever since he declared war on the USA in the late 90's. Fox news viewer is all i can think.
BTW wouldnt animal sacrifice be seen as celebration of animal deaths?
He was draped in the American Flag huh? When did that happen? I find it hard to believe you know that considering no footage has been released coupled with the fact that it is not standard practice to bury a sworn enemy of your country in your flag (which is meant as a sign of honor).
There's no misunderstanding, you've now upped the ante to examples having nothing to do with the celebrations being used. I suppose no civilians were happy about IRA deaths? You know that right? yet another fact-less assumption. You said there was respect because soldiers had it and so did I.
I hate fox news btw but good effort you keep plugging in your smug incorrect assumptions. I thought typical was all you can think... you should probably keep limiting yourself to one thought. If you think celebrating is tasteless and arrogant (though not nearly as arrogant as your posts and how proud you seem to be of your knowledge that fox news is biased and right wing. A fact known by most at the age of 13(congrats)) i can see your stand point and I respect your opinion. However, All I said was that I brought up a sign of respect by soldiers and you jumped on me about it not being about the celebrations despite the fact that you did the exact same thing as an example before. Criticizing someone for something you did yourself, how very Fox News of you. I can't help but wonder what the next all you can think line is going to be.
It would be fantastic to this arguement if you could read. I said you were draped in an american flag the way your getting on not Osama. You seem to be seeing what you want yourself to see or delude yourself im not sure either i am no surprised at all.
On te topic of respect between soldiers i used that as an example between two warring factions. You obviously cant either read between the lines or understand the most simple of parallels. I love the way your calling me arrogant when you are showing the most biast, narrow train of thought that has seen you use the last part of your paragraph attack me on about fox news and once again you are even quoting YOURSELF wrong. Just go back and re-read your posts you keep chopping and changing what you saying.
How very Fox news of you. Plus im more criticising your biast approach to this that is not helped by very vague and misleading. Extremly hypocritical if your calling me out for being smug when you yourself are kind of just floundering about as i have to explain nearly everything i meant in my post.
So please if your going to quote me and then try and make fun of it in a sardonic way make sure you quote me right. Thank you.
First, it's Biased not biast one is a word one isn't. it's easier to read when the writer can spell and use complete sentences. if you wanted to say that I was draped in the flag then it should've read exactly what you had to say to clarify it. you said "Hunted like an animal is what you seem to be missing other than being draped in an American Flag." That sentence implies that I missed the fact that he was hunted like an animal and draped in the flag. In order to display your point more effectively be sure to define the subject of the sentence more clearly.
By using the soldier example in a post you were illustrating the respect for warring factions, easy to understand. I replied that US soldiers showed him respect. If you wanted to illustrate that respect in comparison to civilian celebrations showing a lack thereof the groups would have to be more similar. Comparing a soldier to a civilian doesn't work when soldiers had the same reaction of soldier in your example. In order to illustrate your point your example had to be comparable to the civilian in the situation. i.e. civilian reaction toward the IRA.
I don't see exactly what I chopped or changed (sounds a lot like flip-flopping, what fox news accused john kerry of) I said soldiers were respectful then I said you never brought up civilians in your original post then I accused you of making assumptions about the situation and about me. None of that is a contradiction to anything i said. The only thing that could be considered a change was that flag misunderstanding which, as we discussed, could've been cleared up if you knew how to articulate your thoughts into concise meaningful statements.
As for calling you arrogant. "All I can think is, typical" Is an arrogant and rude statement. If you don't want to be called arrogant don't act arrogant.
Lastly I realize this post was a bit condescending and arrogant. You know what? I'm okay with that.