Osama Bin Laden Celebrations labelled "Disguisting"

Recommended Videos

lokiduck

New member
Jun 5, 2010
359
0
0
... In history today we watched a video on the Atomic bomb.

With the deaths of countless innocents in Japan, the USA partied like it was the end of the world because they had defeated the enemy. Everyone celebrates not because of the death of the enemy. They celebrate because they made a victory...

I understand what the Islam leader is saying because he is stating simply that those who celebrate death are disgusting, which is understandable because I personally found the footage of the partying while countless Japanese laid there dying horrible back at the end of 1940.

Though this is different. I mean Osama Bin Laden was the horrible man and the fact that he is dead is good, and it is a victory which is why people are celebrating, but you can understand why some people would be offended because they may not understand that.

Like the Mosque reader said at a Muslim Service I attended said, "The key to world peace is respect for peoples different opinions" and yes we should celebrate, but we should understand and respect that some might think us cruel for enjoying death.
 

Firetaffer

Senior Member
May 9, 2010
731
0
21
Hop-along Nussbaum said:
To anyone who believes that Americans celebrating OBL's death is disgusting, or immoral, or an exhibition of American depravation: F*ck off.
No, I won't 'f*ck off' just because you told me to.

I thought we were more civilized now, and don't follow the rule of 'An eye for an eye' any more. I believe revenge is a thing of the past.
 

BioHazardMan

New member
Sep 22, 2009
444
0
0
Over sensitive dbag, Osama has been responsible for taking thousands of lives, of course I'm glad that he's dead.
 

BioHazardMan

New member
Sep 22, 2009
444
0
0
Firetaffer said:
No, I won't 'f*ck off' just because you told me to.

I thought we were more civilized now, and don't follow the rule of 'An eye for an eye' any more. I believe revenge is a thing of the past.
It's not "eye for an eye" it's "eye for thousands of eyes"
 

Andothul

New member
Feb 11, 2010
294
0
0
What type of girly man is upset that people are happy that this monster is dead?

People especially americans have a right to celebrate, he was the figurehead and face of
an organization and group of people that declared war on us and want nothing else than to kill us and now he is dead by our hand.

If anything people have the right to celebrate the fact that the world is just a little less darker today.
 

ShaqLevick

New member
Jul 14, 2009
220
0
0
I wonder who is running a bigger number. People killed in the WTC or civilians killed in Afghanistan by the American military machine. It's sad to say but Osama had some misguided motive in what he planned... Comparatively some slaughter is much more senseless.

The world is completely fucked, and I guess we should expect no less. What is a young Afghani child supposed to think about celebrations such as these when some old man got bombed in a cave, but nobody noticed when his father was buried in rubble last year.

I in no way defend guerilla warfare on civilians especially outside contested territory. However, I feel this was an opportunity for someone to be "the bigger man", an opportunity that was sorely overlooked. America is in need of a PR agent, so they can stop worrying what Americans think of America, and take a look at the world at large.
 

open trap

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,653
0
0
Celebrating in the streets after 9/11 is the celebration of the death of thousands of innocent people. The celebration of the death of Bin Laden is the celebration of the death of an evil man who is responsible for the death of thousands, those who died during the attacks on 9/11 and those who died in the resulting military conflicts. Its circumstances like these that change the entire situation.
 

Wieke

Quite Dutch.
Mar 30, 2009
391
0
0
Saw some footage of the American mobs celebrating. And with the chanting and the burning of a picture of Osama. I've got to say, it looked eerily similar to your average middle eastern celebration mob.

That said those probably were just some drunken youth who had already been partying/clubbing/going out when they heard the news at 2 AM. So it becomes more understandable. Still it does strike me as a bit disturbing to see civilized people celebrate someone's murder (justified or not).
 

IamGamer41

New member
Mar 19, 2010
245
0
0
YES HE DESERVES TO DIE AND I HOPE HE BURNS IN HELL!

I wonder if that person considers Muslim affairs killing innocent people who disagree with there religion.Bin Laud-in did enuff damage to the Muslim people I'm sure some of them are dancing in between prayers.

An honestly if you feel sick at the sigh of people cheering that a mass murderer is dead then I guess you also think Hitler was right.
 

RedRockRun

sneaky sneaky
Jul 23, 2009
618
0
0
Turning the other cheek is for losers.

If Osama Bin Laden had been an honorable foe, celebrations of his death would be unfounded, but he was not honorable. He profited off of US aid during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and then he betrayed America after we helped him defend against Russia.

In gaming terms, he is a team-killer, and team-killers deserve no dignity or fair treatment.
 

ImSkeletor

New member
Feb 6, 2010
1,473
0
0
I am personally happy the guy is dead. He was a monster and he got was coming to him, but throwing a party is over the top.
 

ShaqLevick

New member
Jul 14, 2009
220
0
0
open trap said:
Celebrating in the streets after 9/11 is the celebration of the death of thousands of innocent people. The celebration of the death of Bin Laden is the celebration of the death of an evil man who is responsible for the death of thousands, those who died during the attacks on 9/11 and those who died in the resulting military conflicts. Its circumstances like these that change the entire situation.
Celebrating in the streets after Hiroshima was the celebration of the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Training Afghan civilians to murder anything resembling a communist seems awfully dark and misguided... I guess we're all a little more monstrous than we thought.

I don't care if people want to give into their base instincts and act the fool, or just want to fit in. Lets just call it what it is and not try and justify it. People are always worse when looking in from the outside. Ignorance is a disease, face the facts. George W. Bush should have been tried as a war criminal but people just don't care. Someday soon we'll have to face it that on this small planet called Earth maybe everything hits a little close to home.
 

Silentwindofdoom

New member
Feb 21, 2011
22
0
0
I have a question that anyone can answer is they so please.

There's up to 10 thousand Afghani civilians in the ground as a result of this quest for justice and attempt at nation building. Would you consider this morally justifiable?

If the nation building fails, is it still justifiable?

Is the death of Osama worth so many other deaths?
 

spectrenihlus

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,918
0
0
Kaiser Jon said:
Turning the other cheek is for losers.

If Osama Bin Laden had been an honorable foe, celebrations of his death would be unfounded, but he was not honorable. He profited off of US aid during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and then he betrayed America after we helped him defend against Russia.

In gaming terms, he is a team-killer, and team-killers deserve no dignity or fair treatment.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Osama Bin Laden was no Manfred von Richthofen (the Red Baron) who was buried with full military honors with wreaths inscribed with "To Our Gallant and Worthy Foe" Personally I wish Obama came out to the press conference with Osama's head on a stick and started doing a comedy routine.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
BioHazardMan said:
Firetaffer said:
No, I won't 'f*ck off' just because you told me to.

I thought we were more civilized now, and don't follow the rule of 'An eye for an eye' any more. I believe revenge is a thing of the past.
It's not "eye for an eye" it's "eye for thousands of eyes"
And what about the tens of thousands of people that were killed by the United States direct actions overseas? Or the hundreds of thousands that were killed by indirect actions of the United States? How about all the U.S. soldiers that died durin the two conflicts in the Middle East? At what point do people stop with the idiotic idea of an eye for an eye?

On topic, I agree that the celebrations are in fact disgustin. Was the man a sick, deplorable human being that was nothin more than a waste of space? Yes. Did he directly and indirectly cause the deaths of who knows how many innocent people? Yes. None of that means that people should celebrate the death of a human being.
 

spectrenihlus

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,918
0
0
ShaqLevick said:
open trap said:
Celebrating in the streets after 9/11 is the celebration of the death of thousands of innocent people. The celebration of the death of Bin Laden is the celebration of the death of an evil man who is responsible for the death of thousands, those who died during the attacks on 9/11 and those who died in the resulting military conflicts. Its circumstances like these that change the entire situation.
Celebrating in the streets after Hiroshima was the celebration of the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Training Afghan civilians to murder anything resembling a communist seems awfully dark and misguided... I guess we're all a little more monstrous than we thought.

I don't care if people want to give into their base instincts and act the fool, or just want to fit in. Lets just call it what it is and not try and justify it. People are always worse when looking in from the outside. Ignorance is a disease, face the facts. George W. Bush should have been tried as a war criminal but people just don't care. Someday soon we'll have to face it that on this small planet called Earth maybe everything hits a little close to home.
The people celebrating on VJ day where not celebrating the death of thousands of killed civilians they were celebrating the victory over a powerful enemy and the end of a long a brutal war.
 

spectrenihlus

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,918
0
0
shintakie10 said:
BioHazardMan said:
Firetaffer said:
No, I won't 'f*ck off' just because you told me to.

I thought we were more civilized now, and don't follow the rule of 'An eye for an eye' any more. I believe revenge is a thing of the past.
It's not "eye for an eye" it's "eye for thousands of eyes"
And what about the tens of thousands of people that were killed by the United States direct actions overseas? Or the hundreds of thousands that were killed by indirect actions of the United States? How about all the U.S. soldiers that died durin the two conflicts in the Middle East? At what point do people stop with the idiotic idea of an eye for an eye?

On topic, I agree that the celebrations are in fact disgustin. Was the man a sick, deplorable human being that was nothin more than a waste of space? Yes. Did he directly and indirectly cause the deaths of who knows how many innocent people? Yes. None of that means that people should celebrate the death of a human being.
The fact you call him a human being is an insult to every single person alive today.