No [KILL YOUR FAMILY] I doubt it severely.HydraMoon said:Did that panda cat just do the cabbage patch?
I can't believe I watched the whole thing- there wasn't anything uh...subliminal.. in there right?
No [KILL YOUR FAMILY] I doubt it severely.HydraMoon said:Did that panda cat just do the cabbage patch?
I can't believe I watched the whole thing- there wasn't anything uh...subliminal.. in there right?
You know, raising a few pandas is pretty cheap compared to helping millions of poor people. It's like saying, "Instead of wasting money on no smoking ads, we could have universal healthcare."Mackheath said:I don't hate China. I just dislike the way it handles certain things. Like politics or criticism. In this case, I dislike how it handles wildlife.dyre said:Mmm, panda intestine soupMackheath said:Because the Chinese probably plan to harvest their liver and throw away the rest, like they do with almost every other animal in their country; cut off one bit, make it into fine cuisine, and throw the rest in the bin.dyre said:Pandas are adorable, and the Chinese government wants them around, so why not keep them alive?
OT; No. Sorry, but if they won't hump themselves off the endangered species list, they ain't worth saving. Put them back in the wild and leave them to be damned or saved by nature.
Seriously though, it's probably just a national pride thing. Why all the China hate?
Who are we to tell them what they ought to save? It's one of the more decent ways to spend money, especially since deforestation is probably a big reason for them becoming an endangered species.
As for spending money, no. A decent way would be giving the poor a decent education and researching a way to get around the 'one child per couple' rule without poor people drowning their secondborn kids or whatever.
What I'm trying to say is that it's perfectly possible to do both. A few extra pandas is like buying a desklamp with the purchase of your house. Besides, it's not so much that money isn't directed to the poor, it's that money directed to the poor ends up in some official's pocket.Mackheath said:But helping millions of poor people could yield more benefits than raising a few pandas. All they will do is sit on their ass, eat bamboo and maybe bear a cub or two.
As for politics...I dunno, I don't trust a place that cheats in the Olympic opening ceremony. >=( XD
Bear in mind though that they only eat meat when they can't find any more useless bamboo to stuff into their stupid faces.Anomynous 167 said:Pandas eat fish. They are carnivorous.Loop Stricken said:Pandas. We know what they are, and we know there's not many of them left.
But did you know that the God of Evolution basically wants them gone? It's true!
Pandas. Firstly, take their looks; black and white, supposedly to camouflage in with snowy mountains with deep shadows.
So they live in bamboo forests.
Their diet is 99% bamboo. Pandas can't digest bamboo properly. They're clearly idiots. Wikipedia tells me they've been living in bamboo forests for millions of years, and haven't evolved the guts to properly digest the food they life off've.
Idiots.
Remember, the panda-bear is a chimera-esque animal that is half panda and half bear. Unlike the koala-bear, who's name merely contains the word "bear", the panda has a variety of diets.
Pandas do eat meat. Like I elaborated in my previous post.Klopy said:Yeah. Pandas are so... stupid.
They should eat meat. But I think they don't have taste buds that enjoy meat or something. Bamboo tastes better for them. Its like a human eating bark that was sprinkled in powdered sugar. Tastes better but it doesn't do anything for you.
Plus they sometimes don't even wanna mate with another Panda. What's wrong here...
They would have died off without our help long ago.
Even if there wasn't any human interaction, a large group of them would have eaten all of the bamboo in their area and therefore died.
Yeesh. Best part is that they have nothing to offer us other than 'something pretty to look at'. Cows for meat and milk. Ox and Horses for beasts of burden. Pandas to be a pain in the ass.
Oh man, I'd try that. Om nom.Treeinthewoods said:I like pandas and all but I wonder what panda stew or panda steaks would taste like. If we stop trying to save them is it okay if I eat one?
Meh, I'll take her guns away - she won't be saying anything then! Haha, I've cut your strings little puppet!Ghengis John said:In the words of Noel Vermillion:Loop Stricken said:Pandas. We know what they are, and we know there's not many of them left.
But did you know that the God of Evolution basically wants them gone? It's true!
Hands off the panda!
But that's, frankly, a terrible reason to keep a species alive.EverythingIncredible said:How about no because Pandas are cute?
Griffolion said:No [KILL YOUR FAMILY] I doubt it severely.
Applause, sir. I see you've played a blaz or two.Loop Stricken said:Meh, I'll take her guns away - she won't be saying anything then! Haha, I've cut your strings little puppet!
I watched that entire thing and consequentially stayed up far later than I had intended to. Entertaining though, a good watch.Asti said:There are weird animals out there with weird mating practices that didn't take human intervention into account. I think Douglas Adams mentions a bird in this awesome talk that has similar problems:
On top of that, how would Jack Black get a pay check?Bags159 said:And along that vein of thought, whom would bring pandamonium?bleachigo10 said:But without panda's, what animal will we teach kung fu to?