omega 616 said:
Why are we still using paper?
In short, I think it's because there's just too much uncertainty and too little access for most technology.
Technology is awfully dependent on a lot of things. Things like Apple's iPad, the Nook or Kindle tablets, or any number of equivalent technologies do much of their storage and processing on cloud storage. For first world countries, this is a non-issue, but someone deep in the rainforest or out in the desert don't generally have access to even the most remote of technologies (save satellite, which is slow and often prohibitively expensive). If they have documents they need, be it scientific journals on well-digging or the pamphlets to hand out to local tribes/villages about any number of topics (Child care, education, crop rotation, contraception, crude or advanced tools for construction, etc.), it's much more efficient to simply use paper. All of these are much cheaper to carry, distribute, and keep. Much less need access to consistent power to recharge or maintenance for liquid/dust damage.
Secondly is access to technology, and sort of piggybacks on the first. There's roughly 12% of the world that doesn't have access to running water, much less electricity, or the ability to spend $200+ per person in order to give them access to reading material, much less should they ever need to write or notate. (Which, almost assuredly, would be faster than typing on a tablet.) I'm reminded of an old NASA joke:
When NASA first started sending up astronauts, they quickly discovered that ballpoint pens would not work in zero gravity. To combat the problem, NASA scientists spent a decade and $12 billion to develop a pen that writes in zero gravity, upside down, underwater, on almost any surface including glass and at temperatures ranging from below freezing to 300 C.
The Russians used a pencil.
While untrue, the story speaks to the simplicity of solutions in a majority of places. Paper is significantly cheaper to produce, has fewer requirements for storage and power, low weight, reasonable durability, remarkable longevity, requires no central technology, and is infinitely cheaper to replace.
While I do think paperless is a good way to go in the future, the technology is still too unstable even for most modern cities and offices, much less completely inaccessible for a great deal of peoples.