omega 616 said:
Is the cost of cutting the tree down, dragging it away, cutting it up, turning it into paper, shipping it to where ever, delivering it to where ever, then paying for the stuff to use on the paper (pencils/pens or ink from a printer) not included in the cost? Then think how many pieces of paper a single office uses, they are always paper so they are always buying paper.
Buy 100 ipads and sure the initial cost is huge but in the long run it would be cheaper. It's like PS3 and 360, 360 was launched cheaper but with having to pay for the internet for the past 7(?) years hasn't it meant the 360 is more expensive?
- transport costs: Most of the paper I buy in Germany has never had to cross continents (Skandinavia --> Germany) to get to where I am, unlike electronic gadgetry that is almost exclusively made in Asia. Short route transport by truck or train beats long route transport by ship or plane any day. Let's not even talk about who you want to buy your stuff from. I buy European as often as I can.
- limited resources: The precious metals and other limited ressources needed for the production of electronic devices have become scarcer, more expensive and more environmentally problematic to acquire by the minute over the last five years. There has been a shortage in rare earth elements with China being the only large provider unfairly raising prices again and again. Sensible recycling is, as of now, not being done. Trees simply grow.
- cost effectiveness: Usually, when something is really cheap in a capitalist system, it is easy to come by and really cheap to produce. 2500 pages of printer paper cost about 16? on Amazon and are easily recyclable. For the 780? that an iPad 3 costs on Amazon, you initially get 121.875 pages of crisp white printer paper and in the long run way more recycled paper products. If the paper is not needed any more, it can be burnt for energy (CO2-neutral).
- disposal: an iPad is toxic waste and its elements much harder to recycle than paper. The life period of an iPad is, let's say, five to seven years. I still have documents from 20 years ago (I'm 33). My oldest book is from 1875.
As could be easily demonstrated, your economic argumentation doesn't hold water. And first you want all paper gone and suddenly you limit yourself to office application only when someone comes and says "what about drawing and painting on paper?". Paper has been and will be essential to humanity. Old tech coexists with new tech and is not and will never be completely replaced.
Think things through next time, will ya?