After speaking to "Mr. Wood" he said that all the games were rated E or Teen. No M games. Also there were something like 40 games.Bootscooper said:I actually agree with the parents. They knew their kid was a whiny brat, and he seems to be mean spirited ("Junkie *****" and being ungrateful) and I don't think that's the kind of kid who should play video games without restrictions. It was definitely not illegal for the parents to throw the Xbox away (after all they likely bought it and it is their kid, they should be able to parent him the way they want). I think the police officers had no right to do that.
I thought 'gated community' would've tipped people off. Guess not.Jegsimmons said:and this has to do with rich people how?
seriously, besides the parents being over protective what relevance does this have with anything?
and why are rich people bad when most worked for their wealth and usually provide jobs for people?
why are rich people being stereotyped?
well there is some clarification that was needed earlier.ace_of_something said:That's what it's called 'we don't like rich people EITHER' everyone says cops hate poor people/minorities or whatever.Kukulski said:What does that have to do with rich people? You don't have to be rich to be a moron and have a spoiled child.
Though I guess this rich family were all minorities as well. (I'm told they were east Indian)
To put it in perspective their home was probably in the 4500 sq foot range.
IMO, everyone in America wants a Big Brother government, it's just a matter of what they want or do not want Big Brother to do.Lonan said:Electronics are registered in the United States? Wouldn't Americans be against that for being big brother, big government? How are they registered exactly?yuniesan said:Because once they give it to their child even them taking it away will become illegal, most electronics are registered now so it becomes theft even if you live with the person/persons involvedProsis said:Wait, I'm confused. Why is it illegal for the parents to throw away the Xbox 360?
im from the south, trailer parks have gates.ace_of_something said:After speaking to "Mr. Wood" he said that all the games were rated E or Teen. No M games. Also there were something like 40 games.Bootscooper said:I actually agree with the parents. They knew their kid was a whiny brat, and he seems to be mean spirited ("Junkie *****" and being ungrateful) and I don't think that's the kind of kid who should play video games without restrictions. It was definitely not illegal for the parents to throw the Xbox away (after all they likely bought it and it is their kid, they should be able to parent him the way they want). I think the police officers had no right to do that.
EDIT: OMG ESCAPIST QUIT POSTING BEFORE I HIT ENTER. Sorry, what I was about to say was:
Police are obligated to try their best to recover items reported 'stolen.' Granted they could have given the items directly to their parents but technically it goes to 'the aggrieved party' they actually could've gotten in trouble for not going and finding those things.
I thought 'gated community' would've tipped people off. Guess not.Jegsimmons said:and this has to do with rich people how?
seriously, besides the parents being over protective what relevance does this have with anything?
and why are rich people bad when most worked for their wealth and usually provide jobs for people?
why are rich people being stereotyped?
well there is some clarification that was needed earlier.ace_of_something said:That's what it's called 'we don't like rich people EITHER' everyone says cops hate poor people/minorities or whatever.Kukulski said:What does that have to do with rich people? You don't have to be rich to be a moron and have a spoiled child.
Though I guess this rich family were all minorities as well. (I'm told they were east Indian)
To put it in perspective their home was probably in the 4500 sq foot range.
The point isn't that they were rich. It's that they were idiots and rude. After speaking to "Mr. Wood" I can assure they are not the type of rich people that make jobs. I don't want to specifically say for someone with good google fu could figure out who they are.
The house where I grew up has a gate, that doesn't make it a gated community. An actual gated community is highly exclusive and prohibitively expensive, with all sorts of neighborhood watch associations and homeowners' associations and people who have nothing better to do than take a ruler to your lawn and get on your case if it's a quarter-inch outside regulations. Usually the idea is to give rich people who don't have anything useful to do someplace where they won't worry about the fact that people who DO have something useful to do resent them; in practice it usually means they worry even more, because not only are they actually advertising their wealth, they're clustered together with other rich people, making thieves' jobs that much easier.Jegsimmons said:im from the south, trailer parks have gates.
I think if it is a gift, then it legally belongs to the person that they gave it to, unless they can provide proof that the person who recieved the gift promised to pay them back. So technically and legally it belongs to the child. I don't know for certain, but that is how I understand it.Prosis said:Wait, I'm confused. Why is it illegal for the parents to throw away the Xbox 360?