Parents accused of sexual abuse for taking pictures of their kids
- Thread starter Stormz
- Start date
Recommended Videos
This is WIN by any standardSatin6T said:^kiddie fiddle
Now on topic: I think America is beyond hope of recovery from 9/11 because now everyone is so paranoid you can't even take pictures of your own fucking kids!
Six months ago, I think, there was a news story about two 12 year old girls that were arrested and charged for obscene photography/distributing pornography by taking photos of themselves nude on camera phone and then showing them to guys (13), who also got arrested.
Strangely enough, I can remember getting changed into my swimming kit in the middle of the classroom surrounded by other girls and boys. (Back when I was 5-6)
The media frenzy over everyone being a potential paedophile is almost sicker than the paedophiles themselves. But there's nothing that sells papers like rumours of sexual abuse. Sickening.
Strangely enough, I can remember getting changed into my swimming kit in the middle of the classroom surrounded by other girls and boys. (Back when I was 5-6)
The media frenzy over everyone being a potential paedophile is almost sicker than the paedophiles themselves. But there's nothing that sells papers like rumours of sexual abuse. Sickening.
Because this wouldn't happen anywhere else besides the US. The level of paranoia over there is insane. This would never happen in Australia, people tend to be more level-headed.Mr.Pandah said:
What a bunch of idiot's, taking pictures of your children when they are young is a normal thing. It's for memories, my parents did it for my siblings and myself although i don't know where they are at the moment..
Big ego seeing I can't understand the emotional responses that appear to govern the desire to have children? I can not follow your reasoning, doesn't seem egotistical at all to recognise when one isn't capable or responsible enough yet to have children.HG131 said:
Edit: Ahh, on re-reading I had more insight... I worked night shift so forgive me for having less of an ability to comprehend. You mean for it to be a way to embarrass your children if they should show any inclination of having too big of an ego?
Well, at least we have got a couple who are suing for a very good reason (for once, in the media) and that hysteria over the 'pedophile' pictures is just stupid.
Seriously, i think everyone has those pictures taken in the age before you could control your life.
Seriously, i think everyone has those pictures taken in the age before you could control your life.
*cough* L4D2? Australian Firewall? I don't think any of us can get on high horses about our countries politics atm.Emilie Diabolica said:
first of all I think picture developers shouldn't be able to look at the pictures because they might be private. I don't think that would be too hard to do.
Second of all, I think people should stop being retarded..ok I know they can't but I still have hope.
Second of all, I think people should stop being retarded..ok I know they can't but I still have hope.
Beat me to it. Stupid people exist everywhere. They are of every nationality and of every race.The_root_of_all_evil said:
i like to think that most of us in oregon are the cream of the crop, except all the meth heads... workin on thatEmilie Diabolica said:
What. The. Hell.
The oldest kid's only five! What does it matter if we see a "portion" of their genatalia?
Urgh. This is why I can't stand stupid people.
The oldest kid's only five! What does it matter if we see a "portion" of their genatalia?
Urgh. This is why I can't stand stupid people.
I would say it would have to be taken in context. If someone comes in and wants 10 rolls of film processed and it's nothing but pictures of children in bathtubs, then it may warrant a second look. If a person comes in with 10 rolls of film, and one of those rolls is of children in a bathtub, and the rest are of a family vacation, with the children having fun and the family enjoying themselves then it's parents stockpiling cute photos to embarrass their children with later. I understand the policy, but it's gotten out of control. Cute pictures of your kids interspersed with vacation and family photos is completely different from nothing but children naked in a bath tub. But personal intelligence and responsibility is lost in the huge maze of corporate policy and fear of losing your job for not reporting something. My family photo albums have a few pictures of the children naked, or taking a bath together, which while personally are embarrassing they don't exactly paint my parents as pedophiles.
You cannot trust anyone these days.
What right did walmart have to look at the photographs anyway?
Plus there was no evidence of sexual abuse, just some kids, their own kids, splashing about in a bath.
If taking pictures of your own children in the bath warrents sexual abuse, most of our parents would be in prison right now.
I hope they win this one. Common sense needs this win.
What right did walmart have to look at the photographs anyway?
Plus there was no evidence of sexual abuse, just some kids, their own kids, splashing about in a bath.
If taking pictures of your own children in the bath warrents sexual abuse, most of our parents would be in prison right now.
I hope they win this one. Common sense needs this win.
as i often do when i see something like this , i try and 'flip it' to what would have been reported if these parents werent reported and it turned out they WERE pedos and those 'harmless' pictures were nothing of the kind, or just the few that somehow got left on the card after the ones showing daddy diddling them were deleted.
i say this, the pictures COULD have been evidence in something more than innocent bath time photos. the person reporting them did the proper thing imo and the agency charged with child welfare checked it out, seems to have found nothing wrong, the parents get their children back and move on.
if i was the parents, if anything id be HAPPY that i had a local CPS that was on the ball and doing their job for a change. we as a society ***** when things 'slip through the cracks' then when someone trys to make sure that it doesnt happen we seem to want to ***** about THAT.
i think its a fine thing it got reported, it got investigated and the children (who ARE after all the main concirne here) were protected. so it turned out nothing untword was going on, so what? better to be safe than sorry. and id certianly want judgments about what kind of nude childrens photos are ok being decided by a CPS investigation, than too leave it up to the judgment of the local photo-hut flunky.
i say this, the pictures COULD have been evidence in something more than innocent bath time photos. the person reporting them did the proper thing imo and the agency charged with child welfare checked it out, seems to have found nothing wrong, the parents get their children back and move on.
if i was the parents, if anything id be HAPPY that i had a local CPS that was on the ball and doing their job for a change. we as a society ***** when things 'slip through the cracks' then when someone trys to make sure that it doesnt happen we seem to want to ***** about THAT.
i think its a fine thing it got reported, it got investigated and the children (who ARE after all the main concirne here) were protected. so it turned out nothing untword was going on, so what? better to be safe than sorry. and id certianly want judgments about what kind of nude childrens photos are ok being decided by a CPS investigation, than too leave it up to the judgment of the local photo-hut flunky.