Senaro said:
I don't see what the big deal is. Stores ALREADY restrict the sales of games to minors, which is what the ESRB is for in the first place. The only way I could see this really being a problem is if it banned the sale of ALL video games to minors, not just the ones that they're already unable to buy.
I was asking this question a lot at first. I think that part of the proposal is to redefine what is "appropriate" for children, and to put that redefinition in the hands of government agencies far removed from the industry (as opposed to ESRB), which is a big problem. Another part is to step up the punishment for breaking the law (as in, having a punishment at all). Companies that restrict game sales to minors do so of their own free will, and it's not perfect anywhere; "M" games still get into kids' hands. If it were suddenly law -- and the fines involved are nothing to sneeze at -- stores might find it more economical to just stop carrying "mature" (as now defined by the government) titles. Finally, if this law goes through, it would be a horrible precedent. If games are different from movies and books, we could start seeing restrictions that we never even considered, like laws restricting playing games
around children, or even just having them out where kids can get them. See the extra credits video about it: we don't want games being treated like "controlled substances or soft-core porn."
I'd be happy to have someone elaborate on this for me however. I'm not particularly versed on the negative effects it would have on the industry.