Even for pantheons that did make humans less than stellar they were used to describe a group of superpowered beings, so i think eventually even if half of us treat humans like crap we will be rolled into a pantheon. Mostly because many times it is done as a group of "Light" gods verses a group of "Dark" gods.Methodia Chicken said:In terms of a pantheon I think a lot will be seen during play as we haven't actually interacted with mortals yet, belief in gods will probably be based on exposure to and the spread of tales about their actions.
But theres no reason not to belive in multiple gods if you hear stories about them or they actually show up on their doorstep, so a polytheism seems the most likely. then again Some gods could of course impose a "No gods before me!" or "all other gods are but an aspect of myself" rule on their specific peoples too.
The world knows nothing of us currently so I would say right now it's pantheon would be comparable to the pantheon of Richard Dawkins. minus Richard Dawkins.
I don't think we need worry about being a pantheon yet since that is something we will make to keep everyone in check with several universal rules we must follow, and right now before there is a lot of mortals to effect we have no worry.
For primitive mortals everything is a god, lightning or a storm or a volcano or even getting sick. So being called a god and being recognized as one isnt going to be that hard, since while most lost that idea after they became more civilized it would be hard to lose that if you have a physical thing to SHOW you that it is indeed a god and can destroy you if you piss them off enough.
Thomas Barnsley said:That is a good point, I didn't consider corruption in sex. I think the area where corruption is most dominant would be in STDs, which physically corrupt the body. Maybe also prostitution and rape as well, since they are corruptions of society and the mind. You could debatably include some forms of BDSM as well...
ANYWAY, I vote a change of subject. I was thinking before about religion on earth; specifically the difference between pantheons, like those of the Roman, Egyptian, and Norse gods, and monotheism. I was wondering how our patron mortals will structure their religion. For example, will the plantfolk of Leilani believe in the existence of Gi'zeal without worshipping him? Or would they mistakenly consider Gi'zeal a false god? Are our gods a pantheon for all species, or a lot of separate 'one and only' gods? I personally prefer the idea of a pantheon.
I will skip over the topic of corruption in this sense since people want to skip.
But how they put us together is more on how we wish to be seen than how they do, again because every pantheon is created to enforce several rules on those inside it.
Knowing there is something out there is different than worshiping it, since you know of the existence of lightning and know that it can kill you you still don't worship it. It is much the same, the act of knowing that there is a god does not mean you will be worshiping them, more like they have an option of doing so.
Which is one of the good points about having a pantheon, for good gods, is that then you dont have people fighting over it to much who is better. It is either first among many or the leader. Though everyone still has a problem with those who worship dark gods and will more than likely try hunting them down or putting them on trial after there is a high enough general intelligence.
If a pantheon is made it is easy to make each god a different type since many have done in the past, in my opinion you don't have to give humans or something similar a lot of info for them to make a whole lot of pomp to put around it.