viranimus said:
However I have to ask how could a group of hackers ignore being constantly called criminals, inhuman, and have death, and prison rape wished upon them repeatedly by a large gathering and collective and ignore it?
And while were at it, this is specifically in reference to a DDoS attack against the escapist. So I would inquire, can I get a reference to what changes a DDOS attack from being a nuisance to being globally viewed as illegal activity? While were at it, What is the law that grants global jurisdiction against network intrusions due to lacking security protocols? Look I am not advocating Lulzsecs methods. But I would have to be rather thick to not understand their point of view and why this was done.
I don't understand the difficulty of ignoring an internet forum. Besides, LulzSec has started claiming to be crusaders for internet freedom but they react to criticism more harshly than any of the supposed Big Brother types.
Mid-Boss said:
Wow I thought these hacker groups were all about free speech and internet freedom. Apparently they are as long as no one uses that free speech or freedom to criticize them.
Lost all respect for these douche bags.
What he said.
Regarding the legality of DDoS, well Google found me
this, which covers the US and UK at least, and in any case it's certainly immoral at least even if law hasn't necessarily caught up to modern tech. I don't know why "global" jurisdiction is so important. And besides, I was really thinking more about the whole massive releases of private user data than their DDoS attacks when I asserted that they were criminals.
As for the part I bolded: If I enter someone's house and take their stuff it's still illegal even if the door was unlocked. And again, what's with this "global jurisdiction" stuff? Is there such a thing as global jurisdiction at all? Not even the UN represents everybody.
Being able to understand why someone does something doesn't make their actions any less immoral nor does it give me any obligation to defend them. I really hate to Godwin this discussion but it's 3 AM and I'm too tired to think of a less dramatic analogy so I'll point out that as a history student I can understand why Hitler needed a scapegoat for German defeat in WW1 to justify his highly nationalistic ideology but that doesn't make his actions anything less than evil. It just means that it is entirely possible to arrive at a logical conclusion that happens to be evil.
TheScientificIssole said:
Is it lashing at us or not? Still only an okay strip. There's a metaphor and no joke.
It seems sympathetic to the Escapist to me. The joke is that they're full of righteous bravado in the first panel, then see The Escapist getting the stuffing beaten out of it and turn chicken.