That would be fantastic, if social media wasn't the only way some people have to stay incontact with family and friends, especially friends overseas. Still if the reason such things are driving you insane are because other people are intentionally targeting you, things get a bit murky. What if I told you "if people are wrecking up your house, stay away from it", you'd probably think that was more than a little unfair.HardkorSB said:No, it sounds like "If something is driving you insane, stay away from it".
I'll address the points here as you put them.HardkorSB said:No, you don't need Facebook and Twitter to find a job, you need an internet connection.
Those are 2 different things.
Also, blocking is an option.
Also, making your account private is an option.
If they start doxxing you, there are already legal options available.
Many work places anymore won't consider an applicant without an active Facebook page, or Twitter, or both. You don't need internet to apply for most jobs though, as most can still be applied for in person. Again this is about applying. You don't even need the internet to find a job to apply for. Still places are getting picky about people's status in social media.
Those two different things might not be entirely necessary, but they sure improve one's chances, and in a bad jobs market, you need all the help you can get.
The lengths that the harassers pursue to get at their target makes blocking impossible.
Making one's account private just lets the harassers claim victory, while still trashing the target, things that tend to get back to the target even if they isolate them selves.
Most police departments will tell you there's nothing they can do if you're being doxxed. You might have a chance in civil court to sue the perpetrators, but that takes a lot of time, money, and knowing the identity of your harassers.
Let me put it this way, this sort of mistreatment can break an otherwise mentally stable individual, which in turn can suicidal thoughts and actions. This is especially true of introverts who live their lives online, people with Asperger's autism, people with low self esteem, and/or etc... Meaning those sort of people are far easier to emotionally break. Not everyone separates their online interactions from personal emotional connection, or their day to day lives. That doesn't mean we shouldn't just shrug at them, or anyone else, being abused online. Especially when the cases of abuse are concerted efforts enacted by large groups of people to gang up on a single individual.HardkorSB said:I think it actually does.
A mentally sane person who has a proper grip on reality and their emotional state won't end their life because of internet comments.
I think that, and you might disagree with this, everyone who tries to commit suicide for whatever reason is not fully mentally sane.
Unless you become diagnosed with a terminal illness, seriously crippled, lose a family member or something like that, you don't get these thoughts without some sort of mental illness.
I'll grant that I've got some emotional baggage on this one, I did have a friend attempt suicide after a case of cyber bullying. Still an even larger portion of me gets zealous on the subject because I really dislike seeing people be hurt by others, especially when a group gangs up on a single person. Of course charging people who comment on the internet with murder is extreme, but that's not what we're talking about here. What we are talking about are people who intentionally harass someone to the point where the victim attempts suicide. Now a murder charge might be extreme, but such actions are still criminal in nature, as they do require extreme harassment. Now the difference between a fan and an internet harasser/stalker/doxxer is pretty easy to separate. A fan would follow someone's work and their public social media, a fan might they hate something the person they're following did. On the hand, a harasser would make a concerted effort to spew vitriol at every turn at the person they're going after, going way out of their way to do such things. A coxxer would find things like the persons real name, address, and phone number, then publish them to get the person harassed in real life over the phone and in person. A stalker would find the person's most intimate details and follow them while trying to insert themselves into the target's life in a harassing, or/and threatening manner. You don't need to hack to get someone's personal information, it's generally not very difficult to back track things like IP addresses and find out where the came from, thus who pays for the internet, who that person is, where they live, and what their phone number is. That's all essentially public information.HardkorSB said:I think you're very emotional about these things, too emotional for your own good.
What you should do is detach yourself and your personal experiences from this and think about it when you're calm and collected.
Otherwise, the solutions you will come up with will be extreme (such as charging people who comment on the internet with murder).
Also, in the internet age, what's the difference between stalking and just being a fan, especially when the person you're following is putting themselves and their work out there for others to view and judge?
Unless you're actually following the person in real life or hacking their accounts in order to get personal info, you're not a stalker.