Perma-kill a superhero.
- Thread starter SpectacularWebHead
- Start date
Recommended Videos
WRONG! His powers get weaker the longer he is out of water but he survived in a desert for at least a day so its not that bad, plus he's faster, stronger and more immune to damage than Batman. Aquaman would fuck up Batman in a straight up fight any time, if Bats didn't wear the thickest plot armour in the universe. Sorry it pisses me off when people are like "herp derp aquaman can only talk to fish he's crap, herp de derp derp" while never having read a aquaman comic ever. Also he can give people seizures: http://i514.photobucket.com/albums/t349/IMDBsuperman/jla00410.jpgyuval152 said:
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/5/53838/1210972-jla_004_11_super.jpg
/Fan rant
OT: Probably Superman I find his character really boring.
Your links are all broken, just an fyi.SpectacularWebHead said:
And if you want to link images, just the img tag, not [link]
or just directly copy paste the image link: http://i586.photobucket.com/albums/ss304/Supercallo/Dead%20Swath%20pics/batman-dead-3b.jpg
Kill off Batman already.
Seriously, having to take up the mantle was a big step for Dick Grayson. Having that get erased later was such a let down. Bruce should have stayed dead.
Seriously, having to take up the mantle was a big step for Dick Grayson. Having that get erased later was such a let down. Bruce should have stayed dead.
I mean he survives because of the nature of the medium,omega 616 said:
but I too, being a big Batman fan, would choose to kill him just because- realistically, that has to happen to him at some point. No, really, I mean in terms of character there isn't a world where a "Dark Knight Returns" happens and batman is an old man and in retirement. The character is driven by his pyschotic quest for revenge, and the only way his life ends is thus:
1. He gets a girlfriend, and learns to let his anger go.
OR
2. Some lucky punk gets a lucky shot and kills Batman.
I'm sorry, are you trying to say aquaman is better than batman?Eddy-16 said:
Dude, batman is trained in every martial art on the planet. It doesn't matter if aquaman is bulletproof or stronger, batman has more skill. It's like how in young justice (Because everyone watches young justice) Black canary takes down superboy, despite the fact he could probably rip a freight train in half. It's not about strength, it's about skill. And no-one has more skill than batman.
And I'm sorry, but aquaman is pretty lame as heroes go. He's a frickin' king with bullet proof armour, he can summon sharks to attack people and shit, but he's still a joke. It's the fact that he can do all this amazing shit and no one likes him that makes him lame, dude. He's trying too hard.
But...Robin is awesome. I defy you to read one of Tim Drakes comics and Still not like robin.Relish in Chaos said:
Seriously, he's got a rep almost as bad as aquaman, but the main difference is that people don't hate robin more after reading his comics.
Cyclops, honestly though there are like 15 or 20 superheroes I think we could easily do without.
Captcha is prime time what a good way to dig in that Primeval Titan just got banned in Commander ><
Captcha is prime time what a good way to dig in that Primeval Titan just got banned in Commander ><
I guess I am saying Aquaman is better than Batman. IF they were truly fighting as enemies, so Bats just trying to stop or disable Aquaman and Arthur going for a kill (which he would, new 52 Aquaman has no problem killing people) there's no way Batman could win. Firstly Bats is out-sped and out muscled, all aquaman has to do is land one punch (He can lift about 10000 tonnes) or one stab with his trident and Bats is out for the count. Sure Bats may be better at fighting but people like the Joker have managed to fight with him and hit him more than once and he has been frequently got shot and stabbed by regular people.SpectacularWebHead said:
The only way I see Bats winning is if he has some bullshit plot armour like usual, like he had some ray continently installed to dehydrate Aquaman and leave Bats unharmed.
ALSO Aquaman is bullet proof not just his armour and I like Aquaman.
As I read this thread I'm aware that I would love to see No Right Answer: Best Superhero Ever Aquaman Vs Batman.
But I'd rather see Superman or one of the people with a ridiculous power set go. It's not an issue with the character per se but rather that they have to really work to find a plausible issue/problem for these characters which in the end feels so contrived.
But I'd rather see Superman or one of the people with a ridiculous power set go. It's not an issue with the character per se but rather that they have to really work to find a plausible issue/problem for these characters which in the end feels so contrived.
So here's the deal:
I wouldn't kill off an obscure character because there are plenty of them and more would fill the space.
I wouldn't kill off Wolverine or Deadpool or even Batman or anyone like that because...I like those characters.
But I would definitely kill off Superman.
Because he never has to use intellect or skill to find a solution. He just has a power for everything. Whether it be super speed, laser eyes, flying, vacuuming the floor with his feet, there's just no challenge to anything he does and as such he quickly becomes boring and predictable. I like heroes who ahve to work with or around their powers. Not to mention Superman has become so very tired, has a ridiculously all-good personality, and his only mortal weakness says nothing about him. It's basically a plot device to prevent him from just Supermanning (new verb detected: using blunt force to achieve one's end) every situation, and perhaps worse, he can never counteract it with skill or intellect, he just succumbs to it.
So. Superman. Probably didn't have to bore you to death while I was at it, but there you go.
I wouldn't kill off an obscure character because there are plenty of them and more would fill the space.
I wouldn't kill off Wolverine or Deadpool or even Batman or anyone like that because...I like those characters.
But I would definitely kill off Superman.
Because he never has to use intellect or skill to find a solution. He just has a power for everything. Whether it be super speed, laser eyes, flying, vacuuming the floor with his feet, there's just no challenge to anything he does and as such he quickly becomes boring and predictable. I like heroes who ahve to work with or around their powers. Not to mention Superman has become so very tired, has a ridiculously all-good personality, and his only mortal weakness says nothing about him. It's basically a plot device to prevent him from just Supermanning (new verb detected: using blunt force to achieve one's end) every situation, and perhaps worse, he can never counteract it with skill or intellect, he just succumbs to it.
So. Superman. Probably didn't have to bore you to death while I was at it, but there you go.
I choose to kill...Deadpool.
No, I don't hate the guy...I just want to see how the fanbrats will react if that happened.
No, I don't hate the guy...I just want to see how the fanbrats will react if that happened.
Superman - I mean, the guy has one obvious weakness but otherwise is indestructible, that's lame I think, no depth.
