Dongs. [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dong] Yes, dongs. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Dong_Silver]
I will skip the introduction and propose a scientific theory.
If a piece of visual media (films, television, video games, magazines, etc.) contains a quantity of dongs greater than zero, the questioned media contains too many dongs.
Consider anything you've watched, read, or played recently. You may already find this true. But first, we must prove it scientifically. So, each side of the theory needs to be independently true to make the entire theory true. Let's look at a few examples.
Watchmen:
It must be true that Watchmen contains too many dongs. This is true, so we look at the first statement. Find the quantity of dongs in the film. 2 unique dongs with several appearances. Is this quantity greater than zero? Yes, so that works.
Let's look at the other side of the theory.
Dante's Inferno:
It must be true that the quantity of dongs is greater than zero. And this is true, thanks to a giant demon dong. So we look at the statement we are testing. Does Dante's Inferno contain too many dongs? Yes, it does. Perfect.
So, the Theory of Dong Quantity seems to hold true for now. Let's look at a few more to test the theory in its entirety. GTAIV: The Lost and the Damned. Is the quantity of dongs greater than zero? Yes, it is, so we can conclude that there are too many dongs. Testing this conclusion independently- are there too many dongs? Yes, so our previous conclusion is correct. What about A Room with a View? Is the quantity of dongs greater than zero? Yes, it amounts to three if I recall correctly. Again, we can conclude that there are too many dongs. Is this conclusion correct again? Well, are there too many dongs in the film? Yes, so yes again. How about Final Fantasy IX? Although dongs are indirectly implied, no dongs actually appear, so the quantity of dongs is equal to zero, so we come to the conclusion there are NOT too many dongs. Well done, Square. And for one final trial, Chatroulette. The quantity of dongs is slightly more complicated here. Every three out of four chats contains a dong. In a reasonable sample of 100 chats, around 75 dongs should be present. Is this value greater than zero? Yes, so Chatroulette contains too many dongs.
In this study, the Theory of Dong Quantity has proved effective, but it must be put into practice to ensure its validity as an official scientific theory.
So, think of any visual media. Consider how many dongs it contains. Remember, if that value is greater than zero, it contains too many dongs.
Also, for discussion, how many dongs are too many? Well, that's simple, and explained by the theory. And what are your views on media that fail the test of the Theory of Dong Quantity?
Also, if you happen to represent the Nobel Committee, I'll be expecting a call.
I will skip the introduction and propose a scientific theory.
If a piece of visual media (films, television, video games, magazines, etc.) contains a quantity of dongs greater than zero, the questioned media contains too many dongs.
Consider anything you've watched, read, or played recently. You may already find this true. But first, we must prove it scientifically. So, each side of the theory needs to be independently true to make the entire theory true. Let's look at a few examples.
Watchmen:
It must be true that Watchmen contains too many dongs. This is true, so we look at the first statement. Find the quantity of dongs in the film. 2 unique dongs with several appearances. Is this quantity greater than zero? Yes, so that works.
Let's look at the other side of the theory.
Dante's Inferno:
It must be true that the quantity of dongs is greater than zero. And this is true, thanks to a giant demon dong. So we look at the statement we are testing. Does Dante's Inferno contain too many dongs? Yes, it does. Perfect.
So, the Theory of Dong Quantity seems to hold true for now. Let's look at a few more to test the theory in its entirety. GTAIV: The Lost and the Damned. Is the quantity of dongs greater than zero? Yes, it is, so we can conclude that there are too many dongs. Testing this conclusion independently- are there too many dongs? Yes, so our previous conclusion is correct. What about A Room with a View? Is the quantity of dongs greater than zero? Yes, it amounts to three if I recall correctly. Again, we can conclude that there are too many dongs. Is this conclusion correct again? Well, are there too many dongs in the film? Yes, so yes again. How about Final Fantasy IX? Although dongs are indirectly implied, no dongs actually appear, so the quantity of dongs is equal to zero, so we come to the conclusion there are NOT too many dongs. Well done, Square. And for one final trial, Chatroulette. The quantity of dongs is slightly more complicated here. Every three out of four chats contains a dong. In a reasonable sample of 100 chats, around 75 dongs should be present. Is this value greater than zero? Yes, so Chatroulette contains too many dongs.
In this study, the Theory of Dong Quantity has proved effective, but it must be put into practice to ensure its validity as an official scientific theory.
So, think of any visual media. Consider how many dongs it contains. Remember, if that value is greater than zero, it contains too many dongs.
Also, for discussion, how many dongs are too many? Well, that's simple, and explained by the theory. And what are your views on media that fail the test of the Theory of Dong Quantity?
Also, if you happen to represent the Nobel Committee, I'll be expecting a call.
