Billion Backs said:
s69-5 said:
Rev 8:10-11
"And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter."
Unsettling.
Uh, actually listening and believing any religious prophecy makes you religious. Or at least a complete nut. No offense to all the chestnuts, hazelnuts, and all other members of the edible nut family in the audience.
No it doesn't.
It makes me a curious sort who was bored one day while unemployed and was having a good chuckle at the crackpots. At the same time, it's definitely a nice little tie in, is it not? Is it that unbelievable that throwing a nuke into the ocean may carry radioactive particles through the currents, poisoning not only the ocean, but our freshwater (read: drinkable) waters as well?
For my own part, I'd say organized religion is a human construct established to maintain control over the masses. Some religious ideals are quite sound. It's the rote, pomp and ultimate corruption that is not.
Remember, there is some semblance of truth in the Bible (for example). Many of the stories in the Old Testament probably did occur in some form or another. But like the telephone game played by children, the original story has been warped and distorted into the fantastic through constant word of mouth re-tellings of the tale.
For example, there probably was a large flood at some point. Maybe some guy did build a boat and was thus kept relatively safe. It's dubious however that the flood was "world encompassing" and that the man saved two of every animal. There may have been a very large, powerful soldier named Goliath who was slain by a rookie named David. It is dubious that that Goliath was 20 feet tall and that a single stone took him down.
Does understanding this make me religious? No, it doesn't. It does however make me more knowledgeable. People who don't learn from the past are doomed to make the same mistakes. I'm quite content to gain as much knowledge as possible, from as many sources as possible in order to be better equipped in my own life.
A secular example would be that I dislike Rush Limbaugh. But I did read both of his books when I was in high school. Why would I do that you may ask. I answer: in order to better understand his (and many in the ultra-right wing community) thoughts, arguments and ideals. Having that knowledge and understanding, I'm better equipped to counter or *gasp* even accept them as the situation dictates. Remember, a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Now, if you want to cover your ears and ignore anything that you disagree with, or consider uncool, that's your perogative. But be aware, that path only leads to ignorance.