Plot holes in "Avatar"

Recommended Videos

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
DukeisClay said:
Now a question of my own that's not quite a plot hole either. Why do the mech things need knives?
Because it's too awesome to be constrained by the petty boundaries of logic!

Stephen Lang was hands down the best part of that movie, heh.
 

MONSTERheart

New member
Aug 17, 2009
457
0
0
I think some people are sort of misinterpreting what I thought the plot hole was. The rephrase it, I was essentially asking where was Norm when Jake was suffocating? Did the movie ever show him leave?

I think the questions were answered (he went off into the jungle again, apparently), but I don't remember that happening so I can't be sure.
 

Captain Pancake

New member
May 20, 2009
3,453
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Captain Pancake said:
Demented Teddy said:
HUBILUB said:
Demented Teddy said:
Plot holes?
One for me is the fact that a human betrayed his fellow human to help aliens.
I personally don't understand why he would do it.
Because he liked the Na'vi more than the humans. Doesn't get more simple than that
He's a traitor in my opinion.
A traitor from a bad cause does not make a bad person.
So pretty much condemning the entire human race to death as a result of resource depletion does not make him a bad person?
He's not condemning them to death, he's saving his won people from the exploitation of a greedy corporation. The RDA don't represent the entirety of humanity, obviously we must've been pretty well off if we could afford such a venture. I hardly think a lack of "unobtanium" will starve anything except a few greedy businessmen's wallets. But the means they used to gain it would cause extensive damage to Pandora's ecosystem. Let's also not forget that Quaritch was about to effect genocide by bombing the tree of souls, the hub of all the synapses between the Pandora wildlife. Without that, creatures couldn't link, the forest wouldn't function. Pandora would literally die, and the Na'vi with it.
 

dantom1

New member
Aug 27, 2008
30
0
0
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
Godavari said:
Internet Kraken said:
Captain Pancake said:
Demented Teddy said:
HUBILUB said:
Demented Teddy said:
Plot holes?
One for me is the fact that a human betrayed his fellow human to help aliens.
I personally don't understand why he would do it.
Because he liked the Na'vi more than the humans. Doesn't get more simple than that
He's a traitor in my opinion.
A traitor from a bad cause does not make a bad person.
So pretty much condemning the entire human race to death as a result of resource depletion does not make him a bad person?
Why don't the humans take resources from one of the billions of other planets in the galaxy with resources instead of the one with life on it? Besides, you heard what they were really after: money. The unobtainium sold for something like $20 milion a gram or some crazy figure. That's why they destroyed Home Tree, because it was sitting on an unobtainium deposit.
Am I the only one who notices the irony in trying to get a resource called "unobtainium" at all costs?
 

ECHO 062

New member
Jul 4, 2008
33
0
0
The creatures/animals on pandora had those wierd tentacle-interface things, right? Most of the animals had two whereas the humaniods had one. What would happen if you connected several of the animals all in a chain? Would they go crazy?
 

Godavari

New member
Aug 6, 2009
842
0
0
ECHO 062 said:
The creatures/animals on pandora had those wierd tentacle-interface things, right? Most of the animals had two whereas the humaniods had one. What would happen if you connected several of the animals all in a chain? Would they go crazy?
This calls for a scientific experiment!

HOOOOO!!!!!!
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
It's called consumerism.

Also, how many people die in gang wars over illegal drugs and how many people have died for things like blood diamonds? They're certainly not necessary.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
It's called consumerism.

Also, how many people die in gang wars over illegal drugs and how many people have died for things like blood diamonds? They're certainly not necessary.
Do people lose billions of dollars worth of future tech when fighting over drugs? I don't think so. The value of the unobtanium would have to somehow outweigh all the money they spent trying to get it. And the only way something could be that valuable was if it was neccesary for human survival/expansion.
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
It's called consumerism.

Also, how many people die in gang wars over illegal drugs and how many people have died for things like blood diamonds? They're certainly not necessary.
Do people lose billions of dollars worth of future tech when fighting over drugs? I don't think so. The value of the unobtanium would have to somehow outweigh all the money they spent trying to get it. And the only way something could be that valuable was if it was neccesary for human survival/expansion.
Or humanity/the particular people funding this project are greedy bastards who are really well off and don't give a damn about anybody but the bottom line.There are CEOs like that, even if they haven't taken it to the extent of Avatar (because they can't).

If you're arguing that it's a plothole in the movie fine, but from the movie it appears their motivation is nothing but greed.

And even if it hasn't all been in technology, the War on Drugs and the illegal activities it encourages have been a waste of billions of dollars in the US budget alone.
 

TotallyFake

New member
Jun 14, 2009
401
0
0
MONSTERheart said:
I think some people are sort of misinterpreting what I thought the plot hole was. The rephrase it, I was essentially asking where was Norm when Jake was suffocating? Did the movie ever show him leave?

I think the questions were answered (he went off into the jungle again, apparently), but I don't remember that happening so I can't be sure.
You see a masked human run briefly and fight on the Na'Vi side. It's very VERY quick, but I think it's him. Norm was awesome, and got a great "death", I wish they'd done a bit more with him.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
It's called consumerism.

Also, how many people die in gang wars over illegal drugs and how many people have died for things like blood diamonds? They're certainly not necessary.
Do people lose billions of dollars worth of future tech when fighting over drugs? I don't think so. The value of the unobtanium would have to somehow outweigh all the money they spent trying to get it. And the only way something could be that valuable was if it was neccesary for human survival/expansion.
Or humanity/the particular people funding this project are greedy bastards who are really well off and don't give a damn about anybody but the bottom line.There are CEOs like that, even if they haven't taken it to the extent of Avatar (because they can't).

If you're arguing that it's a plothole in the movie fine, but from the movie it appears their motivation is nothing but greed.

And even if it hasn't all been in technology, the War on Drugs and the illegal activities it encourages have been a waste of billions of dollars.
That's what my problem is with the movie. You can't just say the only reason to do that is because of greed. It doesn't make sense.
 

mb16

make cupcakes not bombs
Sep 14, 2008
692
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
gold, titanium both not essential to us bt very expensive
 

TotallyFake

New member
Jun 14, 2009
401
0
0
Booze Zombie said:
What about the fact that the main antagonist has no real reason for being the way he is or that this story is Dances With Wolves, with plot holes, white guilt and even seemingly, anti-human sentiment.
Okay, none of those are plot holes. And you can't use "it has plot holes" as one of your plot holes.
I also have no idea what you mean by "no reason for being the way he is". Do you mean why he's in a wheelchair? Or why he turns against the greedy, aggressive, authoritarian humans in favour of the harmonious, romantic, wonderful Na'Vi and a super strong super fast body that he could only dream of as a human?

And, more importantly: Have you seen Dances with Wolves? Because I'd not even heard of it until all the "Dances with Smurfs" bullshit, and now it's suddenly become extremely prevalent. Have I somehow completely missed a phenomonally well known classic or is everyone just jumping on the bandwagon?
 

Godavari

New member
Aug 6, 2009
842
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
ReincarnatedFTP said:
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
It's called consumerism.

Also, how many people die in gang wars over illegal drugs and how many people have died for things like blood diamonds? They're certainly not necessary.
Do people lose billions of dollars worth of future tech when fighting over drugs? I don't think so. The value of the unobtanium would have to somehow outweigh all the money they spent trying to get it. And the only way something could be that valuable was if it was neccesary for human survival/expansion.
Or humanity/the particular people funding this project are greedy bastards who are really well off and don't give a damn about anybody but the bottom line.There are CEOs like that, even if they haven't taken it to the extent of Avatar (because they can't).

If you're arguing that it's a plothole in the movie fine, but from the movie it appears their motivation is nothing but greed.

And even if it hasn't all been in technology, the War on Drugs and the illegal activities it encourages have been a waste of billions of dollars.
That's what my problem is with the movie. You can't just say the only reason to do that is because of greed. It doesn't make sense.
Of course it makes sense. Why was the conquistadores' motto "Gold, God, and Glory"? Gold wasn't necessary. The only useful thing we do with gold now is to make wire out of it. During the exploration, they didn't need it for anything other than making things look pretty. And yet here I am in the New World talking to you because people were greedy, and for no other reason.
 

Simmo8591

New member
May 20, 2009
204
0
0
StevieWonderMk2 said:
MONSTERheart said:
I think some people are sort of misinterpreting what I thought the plot hole was. The rephrase it, I was essentially asking where was Norm when Jake was suffocating? Did the movie ever show him leave?

I think the questions were answered (he went off into the jungle again, apparently), but I don't remember that happening so I can't be sure.
You see a masked human run briefly and fight on the Na'Vi side. It's very VERY quick, but I think it's him. Norm was awesome, and got a great "death", I wish they'd done a bit more with him.
a minor concern for Norm might have been that he could have been killed by the Na'Vi once he was out of his avatar.... I cant remember if they ever saw his human self before the fight but even if they did he's just another human with a face obscuring mask and isn't daubed in blue warpaint, also the majority of the ground force was made up of the horse riding tribe who have never met Norm... just a small worry for his safety
 

Aloran

New member
Oct 9, 2008
953
0
0
Methinks that you're looking a bit TOO far into it Kraken, and from what I could see during the film, it was purely a consumerism aspect.

As the main character says, it's not the army that are in the forest, they're all hired guns, merceneries. If it was a survival thing surely the army wouldn't be getting paid?

Also, the value of the unobtanium was $20 million per kg. Imagine how many tonnes you'd get from the huge deposits.

Simple thing is it's a LOT of money.

(And I would have done the same thing that he did. He was crippled as well remember, the Na'vi effectively gave him his legs back and a love.)
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
mb16 said:
Internet Kraken said:
dantom1 said:
I don't think they were after resources that they needed and had run out of, they were after a certain resource that sold for alot. Basically, they were trying make money not survive.
That's bullshit. Why would there be such a high demand for this resource if it wasn't necessary?
gold, titanium both not essential to us bt very expensive
Both have necessary uses when manufacturing certain items. And again, we don't have to waste billions (actually, it's more likely to be trillions) of dollars trying to obtain these resources.

Aloran said:
Methinks that you're looking a bit TOO far into it Kraken, and from what I could see during the film, it was purely a consumerism aspect.

As the main character says, it's not the army that are in the forest, they're all hired guns, merceneries. If it was a survival thing surely the army wouldn't be getting paid?

Also, the value of the unobtanium was $20 million per kg. Imagine how many tonnes you'd get from the huge deposits.

Simple thing is it's a LOT of money.

(And I would have done the same thing that he did. He was crippled as well remember, the Na'vi effectively gave him his legs back and a love.)
I know the movie says that they are just mercenaries, but it's so painfully obvious that they represent the actual army.

And again, that's what I dislike about the film. It just doesn't make sense. In reality nobody would waste this much money trying to acquire a resource unless it was incredibly valuable. And the only way such a resource could be so valuable was if it was necessary to maintain the current status of human society.
 

Godavari

New member
Aug 6, 2009
842
0
0
StevieWonderMk2 said:
Booze Zombie said:
What about the fact that the main antagonist has no real reason for being the way he is or that this story is Dances With Wolves, with plot holes, white guilt and even seemingly, anti-human sentiment.
Okay, none of those are plot holes. And you can't use "it has plot holes" as one of your plot holes.
I also have no idea what you mean by "no reason for being the way he is". Do you mean why he's in a wheelchair? Or why he turns against the greedy, aggressive, authoritarian humans in favour of the harmonious, romantic, wonderful Na'Vi and a super strong super fast body that he could only dream of as a human?

And, more importantly: Have you seen Dances with Wolves? Because I'd not even heard of it until all the "Dances with Smurfs" bullshit, and now it's suddenly become extremely prevalent. Have I somehow completely missed a phenomonally well known classic or is everyone just jumping on the bandwagon?
Dances With Wolves rocked. Go find it and watch it.